Title: Tools for Innovation Management
1Tools for Innovation Management
- Prasada Reddy
- Lund University, Sweden
2Tools for Scanning Internal Environment
- Audits
- What is an audit?
- - inventory of resources, assets, systems and
procedures of an organization - What is the purpose?
- - identify what a firm has
- - identify how firm utilizes them
- - improve/learn - basis for betterment
- - provide background for identification of core
competences.
3Audits
- How to use an audit?
- - Audit collects data and is based on
questionnaires designed mostly ad hoc. - - Audits need to be related to the objectives of
the firm. - - Audits can be performed for the entire
organization or just for parts of it
(departments).
4Types of Audits
- Skills/Organizational Capabilities Audit
- Technology/Innovation audit
5Organizational Capabilities 1
- Source Ulrich, D. Smallwood, N. (2004)
- What people respect is not how they are
structured or their specific approaches to
management, but their capabilities - an ability
to innovate or to respond to changing customer
needs. - Such organizational capabilities are key
intangible assets (one cannot see or touch them).
But they make all the difference in the world
when it comes to market value.
6Organizational Capabilities 2
- Organizational capabilities - the collective
skills, abilities, and expertise of an
organization - are the outcome of investments in
staffing, training, compensation, communication
and other human resource areas. - They form the identity and personality of the
organization by defining what it is good at doing
and what it is. - They are stable over time and difficult for
competitors to imitate. - They are not easy to measure.
7(No Transcript)
8Organizational Capabilities 3
- 1. Represents a persons functional competence,
such as technical expertise in marketing, finance
or manufacturing. - 2. Refers to a persons leadership ability - to
set direction, to communicate a vision or to
motivate people. - 3. Comprises a firms core technical
competencies, e.g. Financial firms risk
management knowledge. - 4. Represents an organizations underlying DNA,
culture and personality and may include such
capabilities as innovation and speed.
9Organizational Capabilities 4
- A firm typically excel in as many as three of the
following 11 capabilities, while maintaining
industry parity in others. - Talent (attracting, motivating and retaining)
Speed (in making changes) Shared Mind-Set and
Coherent Brand Identity (employees and customers
have positive images) Accountability (high
performance) Collaboration (working across
boundaries) Learning (generating ideas)
Leadership Customer Connectivity Strategic
Unity Innovation (new in content and process)
Efficiency (managing costs)
10Organizational Capabilities - Audit Process 1
- 1. Determine which part of the business to audit
- division, region or the entire company. - 2. Create the content of the audit - adapt the 11
generic capabilities listed to the organizations
requirement.
11Organizational Capabilities - Audit Process 2
- 3. Gather data from multiple groups on current
and desired capabilities. - - For a 90-degree assessment, collect data only
from the leadership team of the unit under audit.
Quick, but deceptive as leaders self-reports may
be biased. - - For a 360-degree assessment, collect data from
multiple groups within the firm. Different groups
may tell different stories, but can provide
insights that might otherwise be missed. - For 720-degree assessment, collect data from
internal and external groups such as investors,
customers and suppliers.
12Organizational Capabilities - Audit Process 3
- 4. Synthesize the data to identify the most
critical capabilities requiring managerial
attention - Look for patterns in the data and
focus on not more than three capabilities
required to deliver on strategy goals. Identify
those with most impact and the easiest to
improve. - 5. Put together an action plan with clear steps
to take and measures to monitor, and assign a
team to the job of delivering on the critical
capabilities. - - Actions - coordinating education or training
events, setting performance standards, creating
task forces, investing in technology, etc.
13Organizational Capabilities - Audit Process 4
- 4. Synthesize the data to identify the most
critical capabilities requiring managerial
attention - Look for patterns in the data and
focus on not more than three capabilities
required to deliver on strategy goals. Identify
those with most impact and the easiest to
improve. - 5. Put together an action plan with clear steps
to take and measures to monitor, and assign a
team to the job of delivering on the critical
capabilities. - - Actions - coordinating education or training
events, setting performance standards, creating
task forces, investing in technology, etc.
14Organizational Capabilities - Audit Process 5
- Lessons Learned
- Get focused Recognize the interdependence of
capabilities Learn from the best Create a
virtuous cycle of assessment and investment
Compare capability perceptions Match capability
with delivery Avoid underinvestment in
organization intangibles Dont confuse
capabilities with activities.
15Technical Innovation Audit 1Source Chiesa et
al. (1996)
- Core Processes
- Concept generation - identification of new
product concepts - Product development - taking the innovation from
concept, through development and transfer to
manufacturing and use - Process innovation - the development of
innovations in manufacturing processes - Technology acquisition - the development and
management of technology per se.
16Technical Innovation Audit 2Source Chiesa et
al. (1996)
- Enabling Processes
- Resources - the deployment of human and financial
resources - Systems and tools - the effective use of
appropriate systems and tools - Leadership - providing the top management
leadership and direction.
17Technical Innovation Audit 3Source Chiesa et
al. (1996)
- Detailed Audit
- Assessing the current innovation practice and
performance - Identifying the gaps between current and targeted
practice and performance and the reasons for
gaps - Defining the action plans needed to close these
gaps.
18Technical Innovation Audit 4Source Chiesa et
al. (1996)
- Audit - Two Dimensions
- 1. Process audit
- - the degree to which there are appropriate
business processes in place - - the deployment of good practice - the breadth
of use in the company - The degree to which each practice meets known
best in class or world class standards.
19Technical Innovation Audit 5Source Chiesa et
al. (1996)
- Audit - Two Dimensions
- 2. Performance audit -
- Focus on the outcomes i) of each individual core
and enabling process ii) of the overall process
of technological innovation and iii) the impact
of this on competitiveness. - Produced quantitative results that facilitate
comparison between and within organizations and
monitors trends. - Weaknesses - insufficient as basis for learning.
It does not specify extent of gaps or how to
cover gaps.
20Technical Innovation Audit 5Source Chiesa et
al. (1996)
- Innovation Scorecards Process Audits
- Provide a rapid overall assessment of the
practices adopted with respect to the known best
practice and whether or not the required
managerial processes are in place. - The basis of the score card is a description, for
each process of innovation, of the
characteristics of good practice and poor
practice. - This description can be translated into scales
against which companies can review themselves.
21Technical Innovation Audit 6Source Chiesa et
al. (1996)
- Performance Audit
- 1. The performance of each core and enabling
process that is relevant for firm - 2. The global result of the innovation process,
that is how it impacts on the competitive ability
of the firm. - - the performance of innovation in financial
terms - - the impact of the innovation on the competitive
performance of the product portfolio to which the
innovation belongs - - the contribution to firms process of learning.
22Technical Innovation Audit 6Source Chiesa et
al. (1996)
- Testing the Audit Tool
- Functionality - i) test the basic functionality
of the tool and the functionality of the support
process and ii) to test the degree to which the
tool was generic and thus appropriate for firms
from different sectors, sizes and technologies. - Usability - i) the degree to which users are able
to use the tool properly without support from
experts and ii) clarity of language and
terminology. - Usefulness - Short term, whether companies found
it useful? Did it lead to effective action plans?
Long term - measuring the effectiveness of the
programs that resulted from the assessment.
23Group Exercise
- Conduct 1 Audit in a Firm
- Make Analysis of the results - Graph
- Prepare presentation
- Include advantages and inconveniences of a) the
technique and b) the exercise.