Preparing for the Resource Management Model Implementation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Preparing for the Resource Management Model Implementation

Description:

Student aid. Research funding. Earmarks. More corporate funding ... Delaying spending allows multi-year planning. Benefits of Market-Driven Funding and the Model ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: bhof4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Preparing for the Resource Management Model Implementation


1
Preparing for the Resource Management Model
Implementation
  • World Languages and Cultures Department
  • Elizabeth Hoffman, Provost
  • September 13, 2007

2
Recent Trends in Public University Public and
Private Budgets
  • Declining reliance on state funding
  • Tuition increasing faster than CPI
  • Record private fundraising
  • Increasing reliance on federal funding
  • Student aid
  • Research funding
  • Earmarks
  • More corporate funding

3
State Appropriations to Higher Education
4
Resident Tuition and Required Fees
5
Comparison of Trends in Tuition and Appropriations
6
Higher Education RD Revenues
7
Higher Education Revenues by Source
8
Benefits of Public Funding
  • Faculty and staff more likely to look inward to
    institution than outward toward external
    competition
  • General predictability of funding
  • Low tuition, easier access for students
  • More faculty time for teaching and reflection

9
Risks of Public Funding
  • Political intrusion into faculty composition or
    research content
  • Dont anger agricultural commodity groups
  • Culture wars past and present
  • Who will be faculty?
  • What will they teach?
  • What is acceptable research?
  • Funding linked to political views about taxation

10
Risks of Public Funding that the Model Can Address
  • Possibility of low expectations
  • Salaries
  • Research funding and publications
  • Funding in general
  • Lack of competition
  • For students
  • For research dollars
  • For faculty and staff

11
Risks of Market-Driven Funding and the Model
  • Possible overemphasis on competition at the
    expense of institutional cooperation
  • Possible emphasis on money over quality
  • University priorities may be driven by money or
    the demands of outsiders rather than by academic
    excellence
  • Uncertainty of funding streams
  • Possible erosion of institutional culture

12
Benefits of Market-Driven Funding and the Model
  • Enhanced control over each units destiny
  • Better service to students results in more
    tuition revenue
  • More successful grant proposals result in more
    indirect cost revenues
  • More successful fundraising results in more funds
    for faculty, staff, students, and programs
  • Units dont beg for funds, they can plan
    strategies to enhance funding
  • Delaying spending allows multi-year planning

13
Benefits of Market-Driven Funding and the Model
  • Possible change in institutional culture from a
    constrained view of what is possible to planning
    for revenues, expenses, and quality enhancement
    over the long run
  • Costs and benefits of hiring more faculty and
    staff of a particular type internalized to units
  • Costs and benefits of adding or deleting programs
    or service lines internalized to units
  • Moves in direction of all-funds budgeting

14
The Importance of Transparency Under the Resource
Management Model
  • Distribution of Tuition Revenues
  • Distribution of Indirect Cost Revenues
  • Payments for Essential Services
  • Creation of Institutional Excellence Fund
  • Distribution of State Funds

15
The Importance of Core Values Under the Resource
Management Model
  • Recognizing the importance of our people
    faculty, staff, and students
  • Minimizing internal competition for faculty,
    staff, and students
  • Maintaining the integrity of the curriculum
  • Maintaining interdisciplinary programs and
    emphasis
  • Maintaining ethical behavior

16
Steering the Ship Under the Resource Management
Model
  • Make Essential Services a Part of the Cost of
    Doing Business
  • Library
  • Student Recruitment and Student Services
  • Space
  • Human Resources
  • Operations
  • Maintenance

17
Steering the Ship Under the Resource Management
Model
  • Adjusting State Funding
  • Account for new funds generated from tuition rate
    increases
  • Allocate new salary funds
  • Respond to extreme cost increases
  • Respond to state budget cuts
  • Respond to performance
  • Strategic investments

18
Steering the Ship Under the Resource Management
Model
  • Institutional Excellence Fund
  • Recruiting and retaining a high quality, diverse
    faculty, staff, and student body
  • Making sure there is sufficient startup money to
    recruit the best faculty in disciplines requiring
    significant startup
  • Partner accommodation to assist in recruiting a
    high quality diverse faculty and specialized staff

19
Steering the Ship Under the Resource Management
Model
  • Institutional Excellence Fund
  • Nurture Interdisciplinary Education and Research
  • Cost matches for center and institute grants
  • Interdisciplinary undergraduate and graduate
    programs
  • University-wide competitions for seed funding

20
Maintaining Ethical Behavior Under the Resource
Management Model
  • Rules for Proprietary Research
  • Academic Freedom
  • Protection of Graduate Students and Junior
    Faculty
  • Faculty, Staff, and Student Conduct Policies
  • Protection of Need-Based Financial Aid
  • Build in Rewards for Cooperative Behavior
  • Curriculum Oversight to Prevent Poaching

21
World Languages and Cultures Department and the
Resource Management Model
  • Maintain or increase SCH
  • Languages and Cultures for Professions
  • Develop or expand on-line programs or summer
    programs
  • Identify potential donors and raise private funds
  • Participate in interdisciplinary centers and
    institutes and hiring for university-wide
    initiatives.

22
World Languages and Cultures Department and the
Resource Management Model
  • Make sure department recruits and rewards faculty
    who participate in high quality interdisciplinary
    education and research
  • Take advantage of university initiatives in star
    faculty recruitment, diversity and partner
    accommodation as a way to increase faculty
  • Encourage and reward faculty who apply for
    research grants that generate full indirect cost

23
Distribution of Indirect Cost Under the Resource
Management Model
  • 20 to General Facilities Fund
  • 15 to PI Incentive Fund
  • 10 to Unit Administering GrantFunds Distributed
    to Resource Responsibility Center
  • 10 to VPR Office to Support Interdisciplinary
    Research
  • 45 to Resource Responsibility Centers in
    proportion to PI Incentive Distribution (can be
    modified)

24
Resource Responsibility Centers
  • Colleges Agriculture and Life Sciences,
    Business, Design, Engineering, Human Sciences,
    Liberal Arts Sciences, Veterinary Medicine
  • Office of Research and Economic Development
  • Office of Extension and Outreach
  • Experiment Station
  • Revenue-generating service units and auxiliaries
    within the Office of President and Provost,
    Business and Finance, Student Affairs

25
The World Languages and Cultures Department and
the Resource Management Model
  • Further Thoughts and Discussion
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com