Title: Opposing Theories of Language Development in Humans
1Opposing Theories of Language Development in
Humans
- Behaviorists learned by imitation
- Nativists Noam Chomsky
- related to specific structures in brain.
- Can learn any language, anywhere
- Only humans have it
- Principles of language are innate
- Interactionist learn through social interaction
- Social situations necessary to activate language
acquisition device - Have to interact, not just hear it.
- Parentese helps children learn grammar
rules/vocabulary - Its a universal process related to maturation
-
2Stages of Language Acquisition
Stage 1 Crying, cooing (1-5 months) Stage 2
6-18 months old begins babbling period of
universal adaptability. Stage 3 1 word stage
engage in fast mapping must be able to store and
retrieve memories learn to manipulate
enviroment. (12 18 months) Stage 4 2 word
stage Actions, modifying words, qualifying
words. (2 years) Stage 5 telegraphic speech
short sentences using nouns and verbs learn
conversational rules (2- 5 years) Stage 6
expresses concepts with words imaginary speech
uses complex grammar aware of other
languages.(4-5 years)
3Does the language we speak determine the thoughts
we have? Or, does thought determine the language
spoken?
4The Case for Linguistic Relativity
- Whorf (1956)- Snow
- Eskimos have numerous words for snow (wet/dry,
blowing etc). - English has only one word.
- Criticisms
- Overestimated the number of words used by Eskimos
- Ignored other English words for snow (blizzard,
slush).
5The Case Against Linguistic Relativity
- Rosch (1973)
- Danai people of New Guineu appear to only 2 terms
for color (one for bright/one for dark) - English language has 11 basic color names
- Both groups easily learn non-sense names for
colors (shouldnt happen if linguistic relativity
works) - Conclusion we think about color the same way
even though we do not express it similarly.
6Overall Conclusion
- Most evidence does not support strong, linguistic
relativity - Some evidence that a weaker version may exist.