Candidate Selection - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Candidate Selection

Description:

Write no more than 3 double-spaced pages (exclusive of title/abstract page and ... Howard Dean formed an exploratory committee in fall 2002, followed by Kerry. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: brs6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Candidate Selection


1
Candidate Selection
  • First essay assignment reminder
  • Last time campaign finance
  • Getting the nomination
  • Who runs
  • The nomination process

2
Essay assignment
  • Write no more than 3 double-spaced pages
    (exclusive of title/abstract page and references
    page) on the following
  • Are major-party nominees for president different
    systematically today from the nominees typically
    produced before the 1930s? Why or why not?
  • Include a one-paragraph (short!) abstract on a
    separate title page, summarizing your answer
  • example of abstract is on the website
  • 3-paragraph introduction hook, thesis, roadmap
  • Due in class Oct. 13

3
Last time campaign finance
  • Candidates get money from individuals, PACs,
    parties, self-contributions, and federal matching
    funds (primaries) or federal grants (convention
    and general election)
  • Corporations and labor unions cant give money
    directly to candidates, but
  • can give through PACS
  • can bundle individual donations informally
  • can make independent expenditures on behalf of
    candidates or spend on issue advocacy campaigns
    via 527 committees (more than 60 days before the
    election)

4
The basics
  • Donations
  • federal law limits how much an individual may
    donate per election to candidates, parties and
    political action committees
  • no limit on individual donations to 527
    committees, although disclosure is required to
    IRS and/or state agencies (not FEC)
  • Expenditures
  • Federal matching funds for primaries federal
    grants for general elections, conventions
  • No limits in each phase if a candidate opts out
  • No effective limits on independent expenditures,
    but restrictions on electioneering ads in 60 days
    prior to general election (must be hard
    money-financed)

5
Donations restrictions
  • Hard money donations to candidates (for
    primaries)
  • individuals now limited to 2,000 per candidate
    per election (primary, general, special) up to
    37.5K per 2-year cycle multi-candidate PACs
    limited to 5,000
  • PACs raise money from individuals, who are capped
    in totals they can give to parties and PACs
  • individuals can give up to 25K to national
    party, 10K to each state/local party, 5K to
    each PAC subject to overall 57.5K aggregate
    limit (including PAC donations excludes
    state/local parties) upheld in McConnell v. FEC
  • corporations and unions cannot give directly, but
    can cover overhead for PACs money must be raised
    from individuals
  • Soft money spending by parties for party
    building and GOTV Independent expenditures and
    issue advocacy spending by third-party groups
    (527 committees) donations are unlimited for
    individuals some restrictions apply to
    corporations

6
spending constraints
  • Matching funds in the primaries
  • Individuals donations UP to 250 each can be
    matched if candidate raises at least 5K in each
    of 20 states at 250 per or less
  • To retain eligibility once primaries begin, must
    get 10 percent of vote in two consecutive
    primaries or 20 percent in one
  • Candidates personal contribs limited to 50K if
    accepting fed. dollars (see Perot)
  • Primary spending limited by state and overall
    (about 36.5 million this time)
  • A candidate who secures nomination early may be
    spent out well before the convention (Dole, 1996
    only 1.5 million to spend between April and
    August)
  • Convention grant 15 million
  • General election limit 75 million (grant from
    feds)

7
Out or In?
  • Federal law limits aggregate primary spending by
    a candidate to around 37 million if accepting
    matching funds
  • by Aug. 20, Bush had raised 338 million (264
    million before the convention) and spent 222
    million (compare to 186 million total in 2000)
  • Kerry raised 311 million (236.5 million before
    the convention) and spent 198 million. He
    reimbursed himself for some 6 million of
    self-financing during the primaries and has
    received
  • General election funding limited to 75 million

8
Candidate selection
  • Who becomes a candidate?
  • In 2004, 5 current/ex-senators, 2 MCs, 1
    governor, 1 ex-general, 1 minister/activist and 1
    total looney ran for Dem. nomination
  • Cabinet secretaries were common nominees early in
    U.S. history
  • governors, senators, veeps are most common
    nominees since the Civil War
  • fundraising base? organizational base?

9
The nomination process
  • If a candidate accepts matching funds, primary
    spending is limited by state population
  • Different rules for delegate selection by party
    and state states vary in voter eligibility rules
  • Dems use proportional representation of
    candidates with a high threshold (15 pct of
    vote), selected at 2 levels (cong dist
    at-large) but delegates may vote their
    conscience) Repub. thresholds vary by state
    they allow winner-take-all
  • Dems use super-delegates to represent national
    party hierarchy Repubs dont

10
Pre-convention campaigning
  • The pre-primary campaign
  • Organizing, fundraising take time and effort
  • Howard Dean formed an exploratory committee in
    fall 2002, followed by Kerry.
  • Chicken-egg problem for candidates w/o natl rep.
    Examples 6 of 12 Repub candidates in 2000 quit
    before Iowa Gephardt, others used their PACs to
    start the fundraising process
  • State organizations get out the vote, momentum
  • Primaries and caucuses are very low-turnout
    elections
  • Primaries and caucuses were front-loaded this year

11
Proximity voting?
  • spatial theory of elections what kinds of issue
    platforms/candidate reputations are favored?
  • assumes participants are known in advance
    candidate goal is to maximize share of vote
    usual conclusion is centripetal incentives
    vis-à-vis the distribution of voter preferences
  • consequences for the general election?
  • mobilization models of election
  • both turnout and vote choice are in question for
    voters
  • preference intensity matters
  • consequences for the general election?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com