Title: About Mobile VCE
1 Wireless Telecomms in China
Korea Assessment, Conclusion, Recommendations W
alter Tuttlebee Mobile VCE
2Assessment Conclusions
- Lessons to benefit UK Trade Investment ?
- Policy Objectives Characteristics (in China /
Korea) - Policy Implementation Outcomes (in China /
Korea) - Implications for the UK
- What works in Asia wont work here, but
- the UK has different strengths on which we need
to build - Recognising the Issues
- Clear Lessons
- Recent Changes in UK Policy Environment
- Building for the Future what could or should be
done ? -
3Assessment Conclusions
- Policy Objectives Implementation in C/K
- Clear, similar, but different, national policy
objectives - Economically and socially driven
- Looking beyond industrialisation to the knowledge
economy, with major focus on (and success in)
developing RD base - Common Implementation characteristics
- Technology innovation driven by future services,
not in isolation - Specific service and technology priorities,
jointly owned by Government and Industry - Specific, long-term, RD programmes, jointly
funded by Government and Industry at very
substantial levels - Commitment to and mechanisms for
commercialisation - Consistent implementation over time, with ability
to make mid-course corrections and to live with
conflicts and inconsistencies
4Assessment Conclusions
- Policy Outcomes C/K (1)
- Technology Investment
- In both countries the clear lead and support
given by Government has been matched by industry
commitment in terms of financial investment and,
in the case of China, significant foreign direct
investment. - Technology Innovation
- Korean and Chinese industry and research
institutes today hold significant patent
portfolios in WiMAX, TD-SCDMA and 4G as a direct
result of these investments, reducing their
future reliance on overseas IPR - Standards
- Both countries contributed large volumes of
technical results, creating an opportunity for
future licensing exploitation. Both will submit
strong technical proposals in response to the
2008 ITU call wrt 4G, substantiated by
experimental testbed results.
5Assessment Conclusions
- Policy Outcomes C/K (2)
- Domestic Market Creation
- Korea - has successfully created a new mobile TV
service for its consumers and a new market for
its own manufacturers, of 4.2m handsets to March
2007, a 9 population penetration. Its industry
is strongly positioned to address the global
mobile TV opportunity, irrespective of technical
standard (DMB, DVB-H or MediaFLO). - China - is poised to use the Olympic opportunity
to create a domestic 3G market for its TD-SCDMA
technology, which will initially be dominated by
its own local industry. Longer term, if the
market does become significant, it is possible
that a few key international players, such as
Siemens, will also be beneficiaries, with local
companies losing market share, as has occurred in
the 2G handset market.
6Assessment Conclusions
- Policy Outcomes C/K (3)
- Exports
- Korea has achieved the export targets specified
in its IT 8-3-9 plan, apparently ahead of
schedule. Export contribution from WiBro to date
is minimal, Mobile TV has been greater, and WCDMA
handset exports significantly greater. - China has enjoyed growth in telecoms exports,
although its policies have addressed technologies
that have yet to be commercialised. - Industry Implications
- Telecom Manufacturers continue to play a growing
role in both countries economies, at a time when
counterparts in US/ Europe have seen significant
cost pressures and consequent mergers (eg
Nokia-Siemens, Alcatel-Lucent). - The fact that Telecom Operators in in both
countries are now looking overseas for growth is
a new trend, not so evident in 2004
7Assessment Conclusions
- Policy Outcomes C/K (4)
- Regulation
- In both countries the historic separate
regulation of broadcasting and telecoms is
causing tensions in the era of service
convergence. Whilst this has been managed to
date, structural changes in regulation may be
anticipated within the next few years, if both
countries are to fully capitalise on their policy
investments this will erode an advantage
currently enjoyed by the UK which we could
exploit.
8Assessment Conclusions
- Implications for the UK
- Telecom manufacturing in the UK is a minimal
activity by comparison with Korea or China, but - Telecoms is an essential enabler of the digital
economy, which we neglect at our peril. The UK
has - World-leading telecom operators broadcasters,
with mature capabilities to operate global
networks and services. - Great innovation the UKs light touch
regulation, (free market vs control), leads to
service innovation, enabled by cooperation,
creativity and commercial deals, as well as
technology. - World leading research - University education and
research in telecoms remains remarkably strong in
the UK - and has contributed to most telecom
manufacturers having RD in the UK. - A need for a technology capability for
network-centric warfare
9Assessment Conclusions
- Recognising the Issues Opportunity
- Every country recognises that ICT is the enabler
of the digital economy including Korea, China
the UK - but how to seize the opportunity ?
- 2004 Report Conclusions
- Strategic action is urgently needed if the UK is
to retain its role as a global knowledge-based
economyover the next decade. - It did not propose the adoption of Asian policies
- It did identify the need to develop a clear and
coordinated UK response and identified the
opportunity for the UK to provide a lead in
Europe. - It stimulated much discussion amongst UK industry
players, but at that time met with limited
resonance in Government
10Assessment Conclusions
- Lessons from 2007
- Reinforced these earlier conclusions, adding new
evidence - Clear objectives have shaped straightforward
policy goals in China Korea, accompanied by
specific objectives - Detailed approaches to achieving these goals have
been developed through Industry/Government
analysis and consensus. These approaches have
been implemented consistently over several years - Whilst not without conflicts and inconsistencies,
and despite less than 100 success, these
policies have moved both countries significantly
closer to their objectives - Tangible economic benefits and international
recognition, for both Industry and Government of
these nations, has been realised
11Assessment Conclusions
- The UK Environment The Right Time
- Many parts of UK Government now recognise the
issues and have begun to take independent action
the need for this to become joined-up is also
recognised - Technology Strategy the establishment of the
industry-led Technology Strategy Board. The TSB
has shown clear drive and initiative,
establishing specific new priorities and
mechanisms. - Research Impact an escalating priority has been
given to the economic impact of publicly funded
research by Treasury. - University-Industry Engagement - EPSRC has
developed new mechanisms, such as Strategic
Partnerships with industry, to increase knowledge
transfer - Ofcom has endeavoured to take a converged
approach to the regulation of communications and
broadcasting, whilst increasingly recognising the
impact of spectrum on economies of scale and
national competitiveness - UK TI Recognise need for refreshed strategies
12Assessment Conclusions
- Starting the Debate
- What might be a possible strategic response to
strengthen the UKs future economic prospects? - What might be an appropriate (simple) national
objective for the UK? - Within the framework of recent UK developments
how might this be achieved? - We want to stimulate a debate involving
Government, Industry and other key players, to
accelerate the development of such shared goals
and approaches - Policy objectives jointly owned by Industry
Government, and - Implementation actions that logically flow from
these
13Assessment Conclusions
- Building on National Strengths
- Global Operators
- Telcos (Vodafone, BT, Inmarsat) and Broadcasters
( BBC, BSkyB) players who compete and
collaborate at the leading edge of service
convergence and innovation - A Strong Research Base
- Internationally recognised University research
capability, RD centres of many of the major
international communications manufacturers, and
collaborative research mechanisms across borders
cultures (Mobile VCE) - Forward-looking Spectrum Telecommunications
Regulation - Highly developed Service Economy Creative
Industries - Clear Government Commitment to strengthening and
exploiting the science base - The strongest for a long while
14Assessment Conclusions
- What is Needed ?
- A Clear Agreed Objective
- with full Industry and Government commitment,
both in principle and financially, flowing out of
consensus - Structures to facilitate effective dialogue
between Industry and Government - to create detailed implementation approaches,
building upon the agreed objective - Mechanisms to support Technology Pull-through
- eg enabling experimental trials of innovative
research for not-yet-proven business cases
(but not basket cases !) - Coordination of Regulatory and Industry Policy
- requiring the involvement of Ofcom, BERR and
other agencies and bodies so that successful
trials can be rapidly commercialised - Engagement of Multiple Government Departments /
Agencies - to include all who can benefit
15Assessment Conclusions
- Mechanisms ?
- The Knowledge Transfer Network ?
- One possible forum for industry dialogue however
implementation clearly exceeds the TSB-defined
remit of a KTN and requires much wider Government
participation, support and funding. - An Innovation Platform ?
- Possibly but not in isolation
- Wireless telecoms is a fundamental
transformational capability for many (all ?) of
our industries - The integration of the above discrete steps into
an overall national wireless telecoms initiative
could be highly effective in underpinning,
working with and providing a technology enabling
framework for existing and emerging Innovation
Platforms, leveraging wireless, telecom and other
ICT technology across them all, impacting
multiple industries and attracting inward
investment.
16Assessment Conclusions
- A Way Forward ? Lets start talking
- Other countries will, in all probability, set the
standards agenda for products and manufacturing
for future telecoms such as 4G - China and other Asian countries have invested and
continue to invest both significantly and
strategically in ICT, in a logical and consistent
manner, harmonising Government and Industry
activity and perspectives to grow manufacturing
exports. - The UK has a historic opportunity to prepare
itself for the next decade by leveraging wireless
telecoms, to the benefit of our diverse and
strong service economy, creating an environment
to retain and attract manufacturers RD inward
investment - The UK should grasp this opportunity for
strategic coordination and thereby ensure a
significant participation in the next stage of
the wireless telecoms and wider industry
evolution.
17Thank you
Presentation Downloads All of todays
presentations will be available from early next
week from http//www.mobilevce.com/calendar.php
Visit the above webpageFind the entry for this
event, dated 10th August 2007(part way down the
page, near top of the section Past Meetings
Events) Click on View AgendaYou may download
each presentation by clicking on the relevant
Agenda item