Title: Business and Society
1Business and Society
- A Theory of Business Ethics beyond Risk Management
Socio-Economic Theories of Sustainable Change
2Business Ethics
- Why?
- Practical some impressions
- Theoretical the lack of regulative frameworks
- Businesses as drivers for sustainable change?
- How? (contemporary concepts)
- Theses business ethics from an economic
perspective - Antitheses business ethics from an (discourse)
ethical perspective - socio-economic perspective of business ethics
- not a syntheses of an economic and ethical
approaches - critical social science perspective that opens
windows to possible worlds (Giddens) - (1) questions economic worlds
- (2) complementary to impossible worlds of
ethical approaches
3Why Business Ethics? (Practical problems)
- business scandals
- business ethics and global problems
- intragenerational justice (North-South)
- intergenerational justice (future generations)
- ? systemic push towards more intra- and
intergenerational justice (through
businesses?)
4Why Business Ethics? (theoretical arguments)
- Do we need businesses for business ethics?
- Moral economics and the relevance of political
regulations - good games require more good rules than good
players (Buchanan/ Brennan) - political regulations necessary but not
sufficient - regulative frameworks are incomplete
- regulative frameworks are merely reactive
- the influence of the traditional national-state
is increasingly limited (globalization) - consequences
- social responsibility of businesses
- business ethics is more than a supplement to
moral economics
5Why Business Ethics? (businesses as drivers for
change)
- businesses are de facto drivers for change
- can they also become drivers for sustainable
change? - difficult, very difficult but not hopeless and
- depending on other conditions
6- Why?
- How? (contemporary concepts)
- Theses business ethics from an
economic perspective - Antitheses business ethics from an
(discourse) ethical perspective - socio-economic perspective of business ethics
7business ethics an economic perspective
- risk management
- organizational improvement
- market positioning
- civil positioning
Economy
Ethics
8business ethics a (discourse) ethical
perspective (1)
- criticism of the utilitarian approaches of
traditional economics and management - moral point of view as a critical position
- theoretical status regulative idea (not
empirical facts) - transformation from an utilitarian to a
communicative logic
9business ethics a (discourse) ethical
perspective (2)
- Two levels of responsibility
- Level 1 ethics of business
- innovative synthesis between ethics and economics
(teleological orientation) - principal of categorical self-binding through
deontological values (responsible profit-seeking
not profit-maximization) - Level 2 republican idea of business ethics
- ordoliberal commitment (arrangement of the
political framework) - critical public (as community of all citizens) is
the authority of just businesses practices
10contemporary business ethics a criticism
- (discourse) ethical perspective
- explication of the moral point of view as
impossible worlds - normative orientations are necessary!
- focus on ideal communication communities
- neglecting real communication communities
- chance of realization about zero
- economic perspective
- no normative orientation
- argumentation within the economic paradigm
- based on a specific understanding of economic
worlds - helpful perspective but just one possible
standpoint and not the objectively-given truth
11business ethics a socio-economic perspective (1)
- general idea
- not impossible worlds
- not economic worlds
- possible worlds
- critical social science approach
- critical in the sense that the social scientist
tries to develop new visions of social reality - social sciences as hunters of myths (Elias)
- especially economical myths
124 modern myths
- Myth 1 individuals act according to the
principle of utility maximization (theory of
action) - Myth 2 organization are rational entities
businesses merely speak and understand the
language of profit (maximization) (organizational
theory) - Myth 3 institutions are the result of rational
decisions or they are the result of an
evolutionary process of natural selection
(institutional theory) - Myth 4 the economic system is an autonomous
societal sphere (system theory/ theory of spheres
of values).
13other myths
economic perspective
socio-economic perspective
utility maximization
interpretative theory of action
- Myth 1(actions)
- Myth 2(orga.)
- Myth 3(inst.)
- Myth 4(system/sphere)
multilingual actors
- rational entities (profits)
cultural science paradigm
natural science paradigm
- institutions as symbolic orders
conflicts between spheres of values
autonomous system
14M1 interpretative theory of action
- interpretative
- not objectively-given situations (logic of the
situation) but - definition of the situation through the actor
- perspective of the actors ? perspective of the
observer - cognitive frames, scripts of actions, routines
- relevant theories
- Interpretative Sociology (Weber, Schütz, Berger/
Luckmann et al.) - New Economic Sociology (Granovetter et al.)
- Evolutionary Economics (Nelson/ Winter, Witt et
al.)
15M 2 3 multilingual actorsand institutions as
symbolic orders (1)
- What are institutions?
- institutions guide our action
- shared meanings that enable free individuals to
coordinate their actions - reduce uncertain while they help to frame
situations - Institutions are relevant
- intraorganisational
- interorganisational
Next week Institutionalization of
Sustainability. A Theoretical Framework and some
Empirical Results (same time, same place)
16M 2 3 multilingual actorsand institutions as
symbolic orders (2)
- (1) intraorganisational
- profit-seeking is the leading modus of businesses
but not the only one (Wieland transactions cost
economics) - businesses also communicate in terms of law,
politics, morality (ontological argument) - businesses are multilingual actors
- morality is in principal available in business
but not necessarily applicable forms - consequences foster forms of application of
morality - institutional level
- clear values, such as codes of conduct
(stabilization)
17M 2 3 multilingual actorsand institutions as
symbolic orders (3)
- (2) intraorganisational
- explicit and implicit knowledge in businesses is
crucial - businesses as bundle of individual competences
and routines - evolutionary economics and organizational
learning literature - consequences on two levels
- Individual level
- moral competences
- institutional level
- institutional arrangements enable (moral)
learning processes (sustainable change)
18M 2 3 multilingual actorsand institutions as
symbolic orders (4)
- intraorganisational
- (1) stabilization of values
- (2) learning processes and sustainable change
- Balance!
19M 4 conflicts between spheres of values
- the economic system has its own logic
(Eigengesetzlichkeiten, Max Weber) however its
is not an autonomous sphere - economic theories neglect the relation to other
spheres (Religion, Politics, Science, Medias, Art
etc.) - focus on the tensions and conflicts between
different spheres is necessary - theories of societal differentiation are relevant
- Weber (theory of spheres of values)
- geneses of institutions
- Luhmann (system theory)
- organizations as mediators between different
spheres - organizations as origin of change
20Summary
- economic worlds are seen as a possible worlds
however, it is merely one possible story we can
tell - socio-economic perspective hunts economic myths
and tries to tell another story - questions certain assumptions of economic
theories - develops possible worlds based on
- theory of action,
- organizational and institutional theory
- theory of spheres of values
- develops another how it is or how we can see
it - complementary to impossible worlds of ethical
approaches - Linkage between possible and impossible worlds
still open
21(No Transcript)