Title: INTRNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONAL CONTROL AND ISSUES IN GLOBAL SOURCING
1SESSION 13
- INTRNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONAL CONTROL AND ISSUES IN
GLOBAL SOURCING
2FINAL EXAM
- TUESDAY DECEMBER 14TH
- 515 - 730 PM ROOM BC204
- MULTIPLE CHOICE EXAM
- 50 QUESTIONS
- 15 ON MATERIAL UP TO THE 1ST MIDTERM
- 15 ON MATERIAL UP TO THE 2ND MIDTERM
- 20 ON MATERIAL FROM 2ND MIDTERM
- Scantron (Form 882-E the small style)
3International Managerial Roles and
Responsibilities
- Business Responsibilities
- Worldwide Strategist
- Resource allocator
- Cross-border coordinator
- Functional Responsibilities
- Intelligence Scanner
- Cross-Pollinator
- Champion of innovation
- Area Responsibilities
- Interpreter
- Defender of local values/interests
- Upholder of Corporate values/interests
- Frontline strategy implementors
- Stage Responsibilities
- Entrepreneurial
- Integration/Control
- Renewal/Revitalization
4Expatriate attitudes
Lo
Free agent
Going Native
Allegiance to parent company
Heart at home
Dual citizen
Hi
Lo
Hi
Allegiance to local operation
5The Foreign Job Assignment
- Individual Considerations
- Technical Competence
- Job-ability factors are a necessary attribute
- Adaptiveness
- Family adaptation is important
- Dual career issues
- Childrens education
- Language
- Fixed-term versus open-ended assignments
- Local Acceptance
- Prejudices
- From cultural differences
- From perceived needs to protect their livlihood
- Staff vs. line placement
- Securing a Successful Foreign Assignment
6The Foreign Job Assignment
- Post-Expatriate Situations
- Repatriation Problems
- Coming home can require adaptation in many areas,
including - Financial
- Job
- Familial
- Spouses relocation/ adaptation
- Childrens education
- Social
- Career Movements
7The Cost of Failure
- Direct U.S. 55,000-80,000
- Salary, training, travel relocation expenses
- Indirect (intangibles)
- Hard to quantify, but can be higher than direct
- Examples
- Loss of connections may lead to decreased market
share - Host country government may put pressure on to
hire a host country national - Possible effects on local staff
8Control
- Control is managements planning, implementation,
evaluation, and correction of performance to
ensure the organization meets its objectives - Management must balance global needs while
adapting to country-level differences - Control keeps a companys direction or strategy
on track
15-3
9 Control principles often seem simple
- But real control systems have to be very complex
- Keep control systems as simple as possible - but
avoid false simplicity - Rewards based on who produced highest profits
will obscure important complexities
10Control Difficulties in International Business
- Distance
- Diversity
- Market size
- Type of local competition
- Nature of product
- Labor cost
- Currency
- Uncontrollables
- Degree of uncertainty
11Elements of International Control
- Planning
- Organizational structure
- Specific control mechanisms
- Choices about location of decision making
12International Planning Process
- Develop long-range strategic intent
- Analyze internal corporate resources
- Set international corporate objectives
- Analyze local conditions
- Select alternatives and priorities
- Implement strategy
15-8
13Strategic intent as proposed by Hamel Prahalad
- Big, challenging goal
- Shared by people at all levels in the company
- Emotional commitment
- Not just any long-term goal
- Example Sun Microsystems in 1990s
- Johnson Johnson?
- Google?
14Choice of globally integrated vs. multidomestic
strategy affects
- Location of value-added functions
- Location of sales targets
- Level of involvement by HQ staff
- Product/services strategy
- Marketing
- Competitive moves
- Factor movement and start-up strategy
15-9
15Structures for International Businesses
15-11
16Kinds of structures
- International division All international units
report to one place at headquarters - Functional structure Units performing
particular functions all over world report to
central groups - Product division structure People working on
same products all over world report to central
groups
17 - Geographic division structure Units for
different countries, regions report to same top
executive - Matrix structure International units have more
than one boss - Mixed structures
18Factors Affecting the Location of Decision Making
- Balancing pressures for global integration versus
pressures for local responsiveness - Balancing the capabilities of headquarters versus
subsidiary personnel - Balancing speed versus quality of decisions
- Greater need for global integration,
- the greater the need to centralize decision making
15-12
19Control Mechanisms
- Develop teams with members from different
countries for planning - Strengthening corporate staffs so that
headquarters and subsidiary managers must listen
to different viewpoints - Rotate managers often between domestic and
international positions - Keep international and domestic personnel in
close proximity to the product divisions
15-15
20Control Mechanisms, cont
- Foreign personnel on the board of directors and
top-level committees - Credit for divisions and subsidiaries for
business resulting from cooperative work - Reward systems based partially on global results
- Reporting procedures
- Information systems
- Routine visits to subsidiaries
15-16
21Appropriate International Business Structure
- Degree of multidomestic, global, and
transnational politics employed - Location and type of foreign facilities
- Impact of international operations on total
corporate performance - Structures are dynamic
- Structure affects
- Taxes
- Expenses
- Level of control
15-10
22Chapter Objectives
- Explain the special challenges of controlling
foreign operations - Describe organizational structures for
international operations - Show advantages and disadvantages of decision
making at headquarters and at foreign subsidiary
locations - Highlight both the importance of and methods for
global planning, reporting, and evaluating - Give an overview of specific control
considerations affecting MNEs
15-2
23Questions of Control
- Issues Specific to Foreign control
- Distanceit takes more time and expense to
communicate - Uncontrollablesthere are more outside
stockholders and governmental dictates - Degree of certaintythere often are rapid changes
in the environment and data problems - Diversitycountry differences make it hard to
compare operations
24Sources of Power Influence
- Field Power
- Institutional
- Legal
- Demographic
- Educational
- Business
- Structure
- Interfirm alliances
- Cultural
- National Local
- Historical
- Linguistic
- Arena Power
- Venture Structure
- Subsidiary, IJV, etc.
- Organizational structure
- Formal
- Informal
- In-group cultural ties
- Home office ties
- Interpersonal
- Centrality, Criticality
- Expert
- Language
25NEGOTIATED CULTURE
Culture in global ventures is negotiated over
time between members having differing cultural
orientations regarding work. THUS, given
cultures A and B, A B ? AB or AxBBUT,
an adaptation of both A and B
26CULTURAL HYBRID
- People who are experienced in moving from
one cultural frame of reference to another.
NATIONAL
ORGANIZATIONAL
- Learned another H.E.L.P. system.
- Acquired bridging skills.
OCCUPATIONAL
27COLLABORATIVE SPACES
Norms and Values
28NIKE VS. REEBOK
NIKE Standards Compliance to local laws But
Global standard for CFCs Approach to
Compliance Keep documents on file Summary Complia
nce approach
REEBOK Standards Compliance to local laws But
48/60 hour week 14 years as cutoff for child
labor Approach to Compliance Undertake
independent audit Summary Integrity approach
29MNCs Responsibilities
- An MNCs primary duty is to its shareholders
- An MNC should adopt local standards
- An MNC should have one worldwide standard of
conduct
30Sourcing Issues
- Gouging and Exploitation
- relative to industry practices?
- measured by firm profits or by worker treatment?
- whose definitions apply?
- Implications of shifting production among
Countries - 1 per day in Indonesia vs. 24 per day in S.
Korea - Labor component of cost of sales is significant
- Is there any obligation to preserve existing jobs?
31Global Manufacturing Strategies in the
Internationalization Process
- Global sourcing implies that companies need to
determine where parts and components will be
manufactured and where final products will be
assembled - Five elements of the competitive strategy that
affect the manufacturing strategy - Efficiency/cost
- Dependability
- Quality
- Flexibility
- Innovation
32Global Manufacturing Strategies
- Manufacturing decisions include
- Location and scale
- Choice of process
- Control of the system
- Degree of vertical integration relative to
out-sourcing - Coordination of RD
- Licensing of technology
33Global Manufacturing Strategies
- Manufacturing systems
- Single plant
- Multiple plants
- Manufacturing interchange
- Rationalization
- Offshore manufacturing often is done in low-cost
locations and followed by importation into the
home market - Ex a maquiladora is an operation in Mexico to
which components are shipped from the United
States duty-free for assembly and the goods
re-exported to the United States - Plant Location
- Layout Planning
34Quality
- TQM is designed to eliminate all defects and to
ensure customer satisfaction - ISO 9000
- ISO 9000 is a European set of quality standards
intended to promote quality at every level of an
organization - Non-European companies operating in Europe need
to become ISO-certified in order to maintain
access to that market
35Figure 18.3 Continuum of Characteristics of
Manufacturing and Service Organizations
36Can (or should) all MNCs take Reeboks approach?
- How severe is price competition?
- Can we afford to terminate contractors because
of human rights? - What are our operating margins?
- Do we have the money to conduct audits?
- Is our product differentiable?
- Will our actions result in any greater sales or
other company- - specific benefits?
37Conclusion
- Managing a MNC means managing differences among
countries. Often this leads to exploitation.
Are some types of exploitation worse than others?
Whats the bottom line? - Nike and Reebok exemplify two common
international sourcing strategies compliance vs.
integrity. - Even Reebok did not hesitate to relocate vast
production operations. Does this mean Reebok is
unethical? - What are the implications of this case at the
individual level of analysis? What if you were
sent to manage a work group
in a country whose business ethics were not in
synch with yours?
38NIKE VS. REEBOK
NIKE Standards Compliance to local laws But
Global standard for CFCs Approach to
Compliance Keep documents on file Summary Complia
nce approach
REEBOK Standards Compliance to local laws But
48/60 hour week 14 years as cutoff for child
labor Approach to Compliance Undertake
independent audit Summary Integrity approach
39MNCs Responsibilities
- An MNCs primary duty is to its shareholders
- An MNC should adopt local standards
- An MNC should have one worldwide standard of
conduct
40Sourcing Issues
- Gouging and Exploitation
- relative to industry practices?
- measured by firm profits or by worker treatment?
- whose definitions apply?
- Implications of shifting production among
Countries - 1 per day in Indonesia vs. 24 per day in S.
Korea - Labor component of cost of sales is significant
- Is there any obligation to preserve existing jobs?
41Can (or should) all MNCs take Reeboks approach?
- How severe is price competition?
- Can we afford to terminate contractors because
of human rights? - What are our operating margins?
- Do we have the money to conduct audits?
- Is our product differentiable?
- Will our actions result in any greater sales or
other company- - specific benefits?
42Conclusion
- Managing a MNC means managing differences among
countries. Often this leads to exploitation.
Are some types of exploitation worse than others?
Whats the bottom line? - Nike and Reebok exemplify two common
international sourcing strategies compliance vs.
integrity. - Even Reebok did not hesitate to relocate vast
production operations. Does this mean Reebok is
unethical? - What are the implications of this case at the
individual level of analysis? What if you were
sent to manage a work group
in a country whose business ethics were not in
synch with yours?