California Perspective on Real Time Pricing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

California Perspective on Real Time Pricing

Description:

a. Any rate design in which retail prices vary ... in an hour based on wholesale market prices at that hour. ... How do proposed TOU rates compare to RTP? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: sue8200
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: California Perspective on Real Time Pricing


1
(No Transcript)
2
California Perspective onReal Time Pricing
  • Michael R. Jaske, Ph.D.
  • California Energy Commission
  • Committee on Regional Electric Power Cooperation
  • April 18, 2001

3
What is Real Time Pricing?
a. Any rate design in which retail prices vary
by hour of the day for different days of
the week. b. Generally RTP designs compute
retail prices in an hour based on
wholesale market prices at that hour. c. RTP
requires (1) interval meters synched with
time (2) telecommunications to
upload/download usage data (3) rate designs
affecting total electricity bill.
4
How does RTP differ from TOU rates?
  • TOU rates have prespecified values for groups
  • of hours that are thought to have similar
  • costs of generation.
  • TOU meters do not keep a chronological record
  • of usage,but merely accumulate usage into
  • 3-4 buckets of hours.
  • There is no necessary correlation between TOU
    rates
  • and wholesale market prices.

5
What are the key benefits of RTP?
  • RTP rates are superior to TOU rates in
    conveying
  • actual market prices to end-users
  • RTP rates elicit responses from end-users when
  • market prices are actually high or low,
  • not when regulators believe prices ought to be
  • high or low.
  • RTP rates are much superior to TOU rates
  • in providing demand responsiveness as a
  • counter force to generator market

6
What are the costs of RTP?
  • Development of an RTP signal that is
    representative
  • of purchases at the margin
  • Metering and telecommunication installations
    at many end-user sites
  • Modifications to billing systems to
    accommodate massive increases in usage data
  • Loss of certainty in rate structures.

7
How do proposed TOU rates compare to RTP?
  • The 3/26/2001 Assigned Commissioner Ruling in
    the Rate Stabilization proceeding proposed very
    large increases in TOU on peak rates, e.g.,
    increasing from 0.06 to 0.36/kW.
  • (1) Implication massive cost increases for
    peak summer use or major disruption to
    traditional business activities
  • (2) Compared to market prices, 0.36/kWh
    probably too high in many lower demand hours,
    e.g., a cool June afternoon
  • (3) Compared to market prices, 0.36/kWh is
    probably too low to fully recover market costs
    in highly stressed hours.
  • An RTP based on market prices would revise these
    retail rates so that they were based on
    supply/demand conditions pertinent to that hour
    driving imbalance energy prices.

8
How can retail rates include RTP?
  • Set retail rates for commodity energy equal to
    wholesale market prices and separate charges
    can recover costs of transmission,distribution
    and other utility costs
  • Blend RTP retail rates based on spot market
    purchases and regulated costs of utility-owned
    power plants and long run contract purchases
  • Retail rates can be the rate for marginal
    changes in consumption relative to a historic
    baseline usage pattern, e.g., the Georgia Power
    RTP approach.

9
What is California doing with respect to RTP?
  • AB29X provides 35 million to the CEC for RTP
    equipment installation for all end-users gt 200
    kW
  • In current CPUC Rate Stabilization proceeding,
    several parties advocated RTP as element of
    market structure
  • CEC recommended in rate design testimony to CPUC
    on 4/13/2001, that RTP be endorsed as a policy
    with implementation in phases, and proposed
    that a Georgia Power-style RTP supplement be
    available to any end-user with appropriate
    metering equipment
  • CAISO began releasing day imbalance energy costs
    on 2/12/2001, and wants to generate and publish
    imbalance costs on an hourly basis as an RTP
    price signal.

10
Why should Western States be interested in RTP?
  • Many utilities in western states are net
    short meaning their own utility-owned and
    controlled generation is less than their loads.
    All such utilities and/or their customers are
    exposed to short term market prices.
  • Even net long states can be vulnerable to
    short supply if they have merchant plants that
    can sell elsewhere
  • To the extent each utility is exposed to
    Western short term market prices, all such
    utilities and/or their customers benefit when
    any utility using RTP principles cause market
    clearing prices to decline.

11
California Perspective onReal Time Pricing
  • Michael R. Jaske, Ph.D.
  • California Energy Commission
  • Committee on Regional Electric Power Cooperation
  • April 18, 2001

12
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com