Title: Two-photon physics in hadronic processes
1Two-photon physics in hadronic processes
- Marc Vanderhaeghen
- College of William Mary / Jefferson Lab
PPP7 workshop, Taipei, June 7 - 10, 2007
2Outline
- Elastic eN scattering beyond the one-photon
exchange approximation - puzzle of different results extracted for
GE/GM - in Rosenbluth vs polarization
experiments - two-photon exchange processes
- Beam (target) normal spin asymmetry in elastic eN
scattering - new observable
- absorptive part of double Virtual
Compton Scattering (VCS) amplitude - resonance region, diffractive region,
partonic estimate (GPDs) - in coll. with A.Afanasev, S. Brodsky, C.
Carlson, Y.C. Chen, M. Gorchtein, - P.A.M. Guichon, V.
Pascalutsa, B. Pasquini
Carlson, Vdh Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 57
(2007) 171-204
3Early Measurements of GEp
- relied on Rosenbluth separation
- measure d?/d? at constant Q2
- GEp inversely weighted with Q2, increasing the
systematic error above Q2 1 GeV2
Method at fixed Q2, vary angle q (or
equivalently e) and plot reduced cross section
versus e
At 6 GeV2 ?R changes by only 8 from ?0 to ?1
if GEpGMp/µp Hence, measurement of GEp with 10
accuracy requires 1.6 cross-section measurement
4Spin Transfer Reaction 1H(e,ep)
- No error contributions from
- analyzing power
- beam polarimetry
5Rosenbluth vs polarization transfer measurements
of GE/GM of proton
Puzzle two methods, two different results !
SLAC, Jlab Rosenbluth data
Jlab/Hall A Polarization data Jones et al.
(2000) Gayou et al. (2002)
6Speculation missing radiative corrections
Speculation there are radiative corrections to
Rosenbluth experiments that are
important and are not included
missing correction linear in e, not strongly Q2
dependent
Q2 6 GeV2
GE term is proportionally smaller at large Q2
if both FF scale in same way
effect more visible at large Q2
7Radiative correction diagrams
bremsstrahlung
vertex corrections
2 photon exchange box diagrams
8Status of radiative corrections
N
- Tsai (1961), Mo Tsai (1968)
- box diagram calculated using only nucleon
intermediate state and using q1 ¼ 0 or q2 ¼ 0 in
both numerator and denominator (calculate 3-point
function) -gt gives correct IR divergent terms - Maximon Tjon (2000)
- same as above, but make the above
approximation only in numerator (calculate
4-point function) - use on-shell nucleon form factors in loop
integral - Blunden, Melnitchouk, Tjon (2003)
- further improvement by keeping the full
numerator
9Elastic eN scattering beyond one-photon exchange
approximation
Kinematical invariants
(me 0)
equivalently, introduce
10Observables including two-photon exchange Real
parts of two-photon amplitudes
11Phenomenological analysis
Guichon, Vdh (2003)
2-photon exchange corrections can become large on
the Rosenbluth extraction,and are of different
size for both observables
relevance when extracting form factors at large
Q2
12Two-photon exchange calculation elastic
contribution
world Rosenbluth data
N
Polarization Transfer
Blunden, Tjon, Melnitchouk (2003, 2005)
13Two-photon exchange partonic calculation
hard scattering amplitude
electron helicity
quark helicity
Calculation for em -gt em can be found in
literature (e.g. van Nieuwenhuizen (1971) ),
which we verified explicitly
IR divergences of boxes must disappear or cancel
in the end, regularize through photon mass l
14Separation soft-hard parts in electron-quark box
Follow the decomposition of Grammer and Yennie
(1973) soft part calculated as 3-point function
reproduces Low Energy Theorem
kinematics partonic subprocess
15Two-photon exchange partonic calculation
hard scattering amplitude
GPD integrals
magnetic GPD
electric GPD
axial GPD
16Two-photon exchange partonic calculation
GPDs
Chen, Afanasev, Brodsky, Carlson, Vdh (2004)
17Experimental verification of TPE contributions
- Experimental verification (will be performed in
next couple of years ! ) - non-linearity in e-dependence
- (test of model calculations)
- transverse single-spin asymmetry (imaginary part
of two-photon amplitude) - ratio of ep and e-p cross section (direct
measurement of two-photon contributions)
- CLAS experiment E04-116 aims at a measurement of
the ?-dependence of the e/e- ratio for Q2-values
up to 2.0 GeV2 - At the VEPP-3 ring that ratio will be measured at
two ?- and Q2-values
18e - dependence of TPE contributions (I)
Chen, Kao, Yang (2007)
Polynomial fit
log fit
1? only Rosenbluth
1? 2? log fit
1? 2? polynomial fit
19e - dependence of TPE contributions (II)
polynomial fit
log fit
Chen, Kao, Yang (2007)
20Polarization transfer observables
1g 2g
1g
2 g correction on is small
2 g correction on can be tested at
small e !
21proton Dirac Pauli FFs
GPD framework
PQCD
modified Regge GPD model
data SLAC
data JLab/HallA
data JLab/HallA
Belitsky, Ji, Yuan (2003)
Guidal, Polyakov, Radyushkin, Vdh (2005)
22Normal spin asymmetries in elastic eN scattering
directly proportional to the imaginary part of
2-photon exchange amplitudes
spin of beam OR target NORMAL to scattering plane
OR
on-shell intermediate state
order of magnitude estimates
target
beam
23SSA in elastic eN scattering
time reversed states
momenta and spins reversed
rotation over 180o around axis ? to plane
24 Unitarity
25 Perturbation theory in ?em
1 ? exchange gives no contribution to spin
asymmetries
spin asymmetries arise from interference between
1? exchange and absorptive part of 2? exchange
26to
De Rujula et al. (1971)
1? exchange
function of elastic nucleon form factors
2? exchange
27on-shell nucleon intermediate nucleon
X ? N
resonant and non-resonant ? N intermediate states
calculated with MAID2003 unitary isobar model
all 13 resonances below 2 GeV included
Drechsel, Hanstein, Kamalov, Tiator (1999)
28Beam normal spin asymmetry
Pasquini Vdh (2004)
for Ee 0.570 GeV Bn -8.590.89 ppm
measurement of resonance form factors over range
in Q2
New measurements at MAMI at backward angles
29x10-6
Bn
Bn in diffractive region
Q2 0.05 GeV2
E158 Bn -3.5 -gt -2.5 ppm (K. Kumar,
prelim.)
no suppression of Bn with energy at fixed Q2
ps (GeV)
Afanasev Merenkov
s?p
Note on SLAC E158 30 inelastic events included
30Beam normal spin asymmetry experiments
Expt. E(GeV) ?e Q2 GeV2 Bn(ppm)
SAMPLE 0.192 146 0.10 -16.45.9
A4 0.570 35 0.11 -8.590.89
A4 0.855 35 0.23 -8.522.31
HAPPEX 3.0 16 0.11 -6.7 1.5
G0 3.0 19 0.15 -4.06 1.62
G0 3.0 37 0.25 -4.82 2.85
E-158(ep) 46.0 3.0 0.06 -3.5 -gt -2.5
E-158(ee) 46.0 100 0.03
31Elastic electron-nucleon amplitudes with electron
helicity flip
In Born approximation
32Elastic electron-quark amplitudes with electron
helicity flip
lepton mass
new amplitude
33Beam normal spin asymmetry partonic calculation
magnetic GPD
electric GPD
magnetic GPD
electric GPD
34Beam normal spin asymmetry proton results
Results of GPD calculation
Note elastic contribution to Bn is negligibly
small
Future PV experimental set-ups (0.1 ppm
precision) challenge to measure this asymmetry
35Summary
difference Rosenbluth vs polarization data -gt GEp
/GMp now mainly understood as due to two-photon
exchange effects -gt quantitative theoretical
calculations needed -gt precision test several
new expt. planned
Normal spin asymmetries (NSA) in elastic
electron-nucleon scattering unique new tool to
access the imaginary part of 2? exchange
amplitudes -gt Imaginary part of 2? amplitude
absorptive part of non-forward doubly
VCS tensor -gt Unitarity to relate the absorptive
part of doubly VCS tensor to
pion-electroproduction amplitudes
beam NSA in the resonance region as a new tool to
extract resonance transition form
factors -gt In hard scattering region use
handbag approach to relate beam and target NSA to
moments of GPDs