MuD project: m d n n n - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

MuD project: m d n n n

Description:

two md hfs states: quartet and doublet. overall nucleon FF dependence ... dominantly D isobar current. EFT: L1A (isovector, axial) 4N vertex. time-like (large qnn) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: pkam2
Category:
Tags: mud | isobar | project

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MuD project: m d n n n


1
MuD project m d ? n n n
Peter Kammel, UIUC
Outline Physics MotivationExperimental Concept
  • fundamental EW 2-body reactions
  • high impact for fundamental astrophysics
    reactions
  • 10x precision improvement feasible by MuCap
    techniques

2
Relevant Physics
Pn 0 MeV/c
Ld
  • two md hfs states quartet ?? and doublet ??
  • overall nucleon FF dependence similar to
    mp, dLd1 ? dgP6
  • 2-N physics important (deuterium
    wavefunction, ann, )
  • MECs significant
  • space-like (small qnn) dominantly D
    isobar current EFT L1A (isovector, axial)
    4N vertex
  • time-like (large qnn) MEC 10x IA
    contribution, higher sensitivity to gp ?,
    (neutrino mass, historic)

mD
3
pEFT Class of axial current reactions related
by single unknown parameter L1A
  • basic solar fusion reaction
  • p p ? d e ?
  • key reactions for solar neutrino detection
    and supernova neutrino
  • ? d ? p p e
  • ? d ? p n ?
  • short distance, axial two body currents,
    ab-inito pEFT(NNLO) vs. SNPA vs. EFT

gpND
md capture close terrestrial analogue
  • soft enough ?
  • precision measurement possible ?

p
n
d
d
p
n
W
W
e
nm
m-
ne
mD
4
L1A information
From H. Robertson talk
mHe ?
Would be by far best constraint from basic 2-body
system !
mD
5
md theory results
total
Ld (s-1)
IA
calculations
Ando et al (2002) EFT with tritium decay
constraint estimate of uncertainties comment se
nsitivity to cut-off 1 s-1 no 3N
uncertainty gP 1 assumes PCAC value higher
order 1 Lgt0 2 total 1 ann 3 ??, rad.
corr. need calculations 2 body currents 6.5,
High qnn contribution negligible ?
1 experiment on Ld measures L1A to 15-20
Chen (private comm) pEFT, q lt 10MeV/c, higher
oder ?
6
md experiments
challenges md (??) d ?md (??) d ddm
? n m3He
x3, because really statistical mix
Ld (s-1)
theory
experiments
7
update m3He capture rate
IA
IAMEC
Marcucci 02 gpND constraint by tritium
decay Ho,Fearing 01 Congleton,Truhlik
96Congleton, Fearing 93EPM Congleton,
Fearing 93
theory
time
experiment
Ackerbauer 98
Lst (s-1)
8
Differential observables
  • n-n correlation at small qnn ann measurement,
    current exp ann18.9 (4) fm
  • dL/dEn
  • Lq/Ld2.5 measurement
  • Asymmetry and mSR

9
Summary physics motivation
  • precision measurement of total md capture rate to
    1 provides
  • first precise measurement of charged-current
    reaction in 2N system
  • first precise 2N experimental information
    relevant for absolute solar neutrino cross
    sections and flux.
  • comparison of EFT/SNPA approach for space-like
    axial two-body current and 2N vs 3N
    constraints.
  • ann information ? (needs study)
  • systematic measurement of md capture Dalitz Plot
    provides
  • information on time-like axial two-body
    currents, ppp puzzle
  • reduced rate L, accessible to pEFT
  • complementary gP sensitivity, if MECs
    sufficiently under control (needs study)
  • first measurement of md capture asymmetry and hfs
    effects provides
  • complementary gp info (needs study)

10
1 precision experiment possible?
  • measurement of absolute rate 3 (MuD 0) ?
  • Basic lifetime method, present TPC
  • measurement of absolute rate 1 (MuD I)
  • Kinetics requires optimized target conditions
    80K, 5 density, new TPC arrangement
  • mSR effects
  • isotopic purity much simpler
  • measure full DP if sufficient physics motivation
    (MuD II) Neutron detector array
  • Kinematics determined by angle and dt
  • liquid target?
  • Goals
  • determine reduced rate L by subtracting
    Dalitz Plot (Engt10MeV) with 5 prec.
  • gP, time-like MECs
  • lt1 precision seems possible according to
    preliminary feasibility study !

md(??)
5 LD280 K
md(??)
m3He
20
En (MeV)
En (MeV)
L90 of intensity
11
kinetics
12
kinetics
5 LD280 K
1 LD2300 K
md(??)
md(??)
md(??)
md(??)
m3He
m3He
Sensitivity to parameter y S(y)DLd/Ld / Dy/y
f1, T300 systematic errors 1f5, T80
corrections lt3, systematic errors lt0.1
13
Exp. concept
14
Comments on L1A relevance
pEFT
pEFT
SNPA
EFT
15
see Butler talk
Something interesting at NLO
  • m-dependent!
  • A two-body counterterm appears

16
Orland
D20 (30) Tons
H20 (1500) Tons
NatFe (13.5 Tons)
NatPb(50 Tons)
Intrinsic neutrino properties and SM
physics Calibrating the Sun n d Strangeness
Form Factors n 16O Supernova
Thermometry n 16O Supernova Explosion
Mechanism n natFe Calibrating Supernova
Detectors n 16O n d
17
nd
exp Bugey 1998 nd ? npn 6.08(77)
10-45 cm2 enn 9.83(204) 10-45 cm2
theory SNPA Ying, Haxton, Henley / Tatara,
Koyama, Kubodera
5-10 difference ChPT
NLO Butler, Chen (2000) pEFT
NNLO Butler, Chen, Kong (2001)
6.3 fm3
1.0 fm3
one unknown low energy constant L1A for 4 nucleon
axial counterterm, about ?5 contribution,
universal for nd reactions ...
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com