Title: Cancer Genes and Targets for Therapy
1Cancer Genes and Targets for Therapy
Helen C Hurst
- Molecular Oncology Unit
- Charterhouse Square
2Cancer Treatment
Surgery
Chemotherapy Radiotherapy
Apoptosis
3Cells in multicellular organisms are continually
receiving signals from each other and their
environment
This leads to proliferation, differentiation or
even cell death (apoptosis) as appropriate to the
needs of the organism as a whole In cancer, this
normal balance goes awry ? Cancer Genes
4Cancer progression in ductal carcinoma of the
pancreas
.progressive mutation/activation of cancer
genes
5What is a Cancer Gene?
- Proliferation Oncogenes and Tumour suppressor
genes - Cell survival Apoptosis vs DNA repair
- Epithelial-stromal interactions Angiogenesis,
Invasion and Metastasis - Cell surface markers Immune Evasion
- Membrane pumps Drug resistance and response to
therapy - Metabolism allow more rapid growth (e.g.
ribogenesis)
- ? virtually any gene product may be a target for
therapy as long as - Its expression level/structure/activity is
sufficiently different between normal and tumour
cells - It is required for continued growth/survival of
the tumour cells - Many are involved in cellular signalling pathways
6Signalling Pathways
Growth/survival
GFs
2nd messenger cascade
Small Molecules
Arrest/apoptosis
7Examples of Targeted Therapies in Clinical Use
- Anti-endocrine therapies
- Tamoxifen (anti-ER therapy) - breast cancer
- Anti-androgen therapy - prostate cancer
- Anti-ErbB therapies
- Herceptin - immunotherapy against HER2/ ERBB2 in
breast cancer - Iressa - small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor
against EGFR for solid tumours - Glivec - small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor
against Bcr-abl for CML
8Oestrogen Receptor in Breast Cancer
Normal - only a few cells express ER
ER ve tumour
65 of breast tumours are ER ve ? show
proliferative response to oestrogens (ovaries) ?
benefit from anti-oestrogen therapy
9The ER is a ligand dependent transcription factor
Proteins that ? Growth/survival
ERE (oestrogen response element)
10Use of anti-oestrogens in treating breast cancer
- Anti-oestrogens block the binding of oestrogen to
the ER ? proliferative gene expression and
signalling are blocked - Giving early stage, ERve patients Tamoxifen for
5 years immediately after surgery has ?
mortality by 28 - Tamoxifen use in early stage disease ? UK annual
breast cancer mortality rate fell from 16,000 to
12,800 in 12 years (1988-2000)
But...
11. there are problems
- Tamoxifen is associated with a 2-fold ? risk of
blood clot formation (thromboembolism) - Tamoxifen is linked to a 2.5-fold ? risk of
endometrial cancer - Significant numbers of ER ve patients never
respond to Tamoxifen (de novo resistance) - Those that do respond initially, can relapse with
resistant disease (acquired resistance)
because oestrogen has a bad and a good side.
12Pluses and minuses
- Anti-oestrogens like Tamoxifen and Raloxifene are
partial agonists ? block oestrogen action in
breast allow some signalling in other organs - This has consequences that are both positive and
negative - Tamoxifen and Raloxifene are both agonists in
bone ? protect against osteoporosis - In the endometrium Tamoxifen (but not Raloxifene)
is an agonist, hence ? endometrial cancer
13Alternative strategies
- Use total oestrogen agonists like Faslodex that
block all oestrogenic activity and result in
down-regulation of the ER - Remove oestrogens altogether using aromatase
inhibitors which prevent synthesis of oestrogens
Clinical trials have shown aromatse inhibitors to
be effective and well-tolerated and resistance is
slower to develop.
however, resistance to these agents is an issue
and develops for largely similar reasons as
Tamoxifen resistance
14Signal pathway cross-talk ? oestrogen-independence
? target 1 or more of these pathways in addition
(combination therapy)
15- AR in Prostate Cancer
- All PC initially respond
- to anti-androgen therapy
- After 2-5 years tumours
- become resistant
- Various mechanisms e.g.
- mutation of AR and/or
- gene amplification
- Increased signalling via
- other pathways (as in
- breast cancer) also
- important
16What are ErbB proteins?
- ErbB family of trans-membrane glycoproteins
with an extracellular ligand binding domain and
an intracellular tyrosine kinase domain - Referred to as receptor tyrosine kinases
- Ligand binding ? receptor dimerisation, kinase
activation, auto-phosphorylation (on Y) ?
signalling cascade initiation - Normal function ? mediate cell-cell interactions
in organogenesis and during adulthood
Docking sites for signalling proteins
17The ErbB Network
18IHC
FISH
ERBB2 overexpressed in many solid tumours e.g.
25 breast carcinomas ? correlates with
ER negativity and poor prognosis
19The development of Herceptin(Trastuzumab)
- Researchers at Genentech raised mouse monoclonal
antibodies against the extra-cellular domain of
ErbB2 - One of these, 4D5, potently inhibited growth of
ErbB2 overexpressing cultured human breast tumour
cells - Murine antibodies are limited clinically due to
being immunogenic - ? Recombinant, humanised antibody created
- Herceptin has a higher affinity for ErbB2 than
4D5 and has a cytostatic growth inhibitory effect
against ErbB2ve breast cancer lines
20Humanising an antibody
21Herceptin in the clinic
- Shown to be well-tolerated have anti-tumour
activity - In randomised trials - improved survival in
patients with amplification of the ERBB2 gene - Approved for use in metastatic ErbB2ve breast
tumours (1998) - Largely used in combination with chemotherapy
drugs (taxol, cisplatin cardiac side-effects
with dox) - Mode of action ErbB2 downregulation prevents
cleavage of extracellular domain (causes
activation) activates patients own immune
response
22Future improvements
- Herceptin has no activity on tumours that express
moderate levels of ErbB2 ? limits its use - 2C4 binds a different epitope ? blocks ErbB2
dimerisation with other ErbB receptors ? prevents
signalling in low- and high-expressing lines - Anti-tumour effects in xenografts of breast and
prostatic tumours - Shown to be safe (Phase I) now in Phase II
(efficacy) trials - May be useful in a wide range of ErbB2 ve solid
tumours.
23No signalling
Proliferation/Survival
24(No Transcript)
25Iressa (Gefitinib ZD1839)
- Selective and reversible small molecule inhibitor
of EGFR tyrosine kinase activity (from
AstraZeneca) - Also inhibits signalling via EGFR dimerisation
with other ErbB family members - Preclinical studies - inhibited growth of various
tumour lines and xenografts - Synergised with cytotoxic chemotherapy agents
(e.g. paclitaxel) and radiation therapy in
sensitive lines - Paradox senisitive lines could not be predicted
from their level of EGFR expression
26Mode of Action of Iressa
27Iressa in the clinic
- Good oral bio-availability and well-tolerated ?
can be taken once daily (Phase I) - Good anti-tumour responses in mono- and
combination therapy in a variety of solid
tumours NSCLC, colorectal, breast, head neck
(Phase II/III) - Approved for use in patients with advanced,
chemo-resistant NSCLC - Assays to determine which patients (NSCLC and
other) will benefit most being developed - Combination therapies being optimised
28Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia (CML)
- Characterised by a massive clonal proliferation
of myeloid cells - Accounts for 15-20 of all leukaemia cases
- Has 3 phases chronic (or stable) accelerated
blast - Chronic phase excess numbers of myeloid cells
that still differentiate (i.e. cease dividing) as
normal - In 4-6 years disease progresses to blast crisis ?
accumulated mutations ? ability to differentiate
is lost - Transplantation can cure (but problematic) ? less
than 20 of cases can be cured
What mutations cause this?
29Chromosome 1
Gene A
Gene B
Chromosome 2
Fusion Gene
Primary transcript
Fusion mRNA
Unique Properties
Altered Pattern of gene expression
Chimaeric protein
Acts as an oncogene
Differentiation Blocked
65 of leukaemias are characterised by particular
somatically acquired chromosome translocations
Continued self-renewal
30Bcr-abl constitutively active tyrosine kinase
(The protein product from this fusion gene only
found in 70 of patients)
Chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) is characterised
by the t(922)(q34q11) reciprocal translocation
31 32(No Transcript)
33Bcr-abl inhibitor, Glivec(Gleevec Imatinib
ST1571)
- Rationally designed small molecule that binds to
an inactive form of Bcr-abl and prevents ATP
recruitment ? tyrosine kinase activation is
blocked - Pre-clinical studies ? growth inhibition and
induction of apoptosis specifically in Bcr-abl
expressing cells - Shown to be orally active and well tolerated
- Effective therapy for all stages of CML inducing
remission in 80 of patients - Approved in May 2001 lt 3yrs after first Phase I
study - gt95 patients with chronic phase (stable) disease
? durable response
but
34The downside
- all patients with advanced disease will relapse
? develop resistance to Glivec - Main mechanism reactivation of Bcr-abl kinase
via point mutations that ? drug sensitivity 3- to
gt100-fold
The solution
- Combination therapy using Glivec with cytotoxic
agents and/or interferon - Use rational drug design to make similar drug
that binds more avidly AMN107 with gt20-fold
higher affinity for wt and mutant Bcr-abl,
published Feb 2005
35Summary
- Targeted therapies can be more selective and show
improved efficacy with minimal toxicity - Almost invariably, initial response and latency
followed by disease resistance - ? inherent weakness of monotherapy
- Combination therapy with cytotoxic drugs is being
assessed but the mutagenic nature of these may
accelerate the development of resistance - Simultaneous use of multiple targeted agents may
? faster responses and more durable remissions - Need yet more detailed knowledge of the molecular
changes during cancer progression ? TARGETS
36Suggested Reading
- Tamoxifen a most unlikely pioneering medicine
- Jordan VC (2003) Nat. Rev. Cancer 2, 205-13
- Aromatase Inhibitors for breast cancer lessons
from the laboratory Johnston SRD Dowsett M
(2003) Nat. Rev. Cancer 3, 821-31 - Untangling the ErbB signalling network Yarden Y
Sliwkowski MX (2001) Nat. Rev. Cancer 2,
127-37 - STI571 (Gleevec) as a paradigm for cancer
therapy BJ Drucker (2002) Trends Mol. Medicine
8, S14-18