Engaging researchers through evidence based interventions

1
Engaging researchers through evidence based
interventions

• e-Research Community Engagement
• 20 May 2009
• Neil Chue Hong

2
Engaging Research with e-Infrastructure

• What do people want to do? What are they doing
  already?
• Trivial barriers can seem insurmountable
• Demonstrate success and inspire trust in
  e-Infrastructure
• Get users to engage with e-Infrastructure to
  improve research output

• Interview researchers to identify what works and
  whats needed
• Analyse requirements and propose interventions
• Develop solutions and disseminate best practice
• www.engage.ac.uk

3
Engaging Research with e-Infrastructure
Interviews
Wider deployment
Projects
Dissemination
Adoption
New requirements
4
ENGAGE Researcher Interviews

• 53 interviews
• semistructured
• 36 face-to-face
• 17 telephone
• 60 people
• 24 institutions
• Triage process to identify development projects
  and best practice

5
The Analysis ofData in ENGAGE
Interview Summary
1) Writes own software in Python - looking at
better ways of getting it used 2) Software works
on multiple datasets mapping to own data
format 3) Cytoscape not automated. Cannot
automate visualisations. 4) Data visualisation is
restricted as there are multiple datasets to
download and access 6) Runs take 1-2 weeks. Not
interactive. 7) Cannot submit large jobs.
Transcription
Analysis Triage
Obstacles
Best Practice
Interviews

• Tools not easily accessible to other researchers
• Unable to run large jobs on current resources
• Difficult to reuse / repurpose workflows

Sourcing a system on which to run the
services Assumptions made by software
installation Assumptions made handling I/O with
WS framework Timing issues when checking for
secure services Teaching, admin and other
research commitments meant that the primary
researcher had insufficient time

• Undertake feasibility study and investigate
  making the protein sequence databases available
  as web services before the wrapped applications
  can use their data.
• Get the wrapped applications and workflows to
  work in a production environment on
  instituitional facilities
• Investigate and carry out the migration from the
  production environment to the NGS.

Commission
Evaluation
Evaluation Report
Development Project
ProjectBrief
6
Case 2 - Interview Summary

• Lost support of software
• Certificates cause problems
• Analysis takes 3 days
• Cannot log in to MetaData Database 50 of time
  due to proxy certificate problems
• Would use grid tools is had more confidence in
  their stability
• Security an issue as human nature has made it
  less secure
• Morphology and Growth Rate calculations better if
  distributed
• Lots of data uploaded to NGS
• Process takes 3 months from beginning to end

7
Post Interview Questionnaire

• Research/project objective
• Name of main sponsor of the work
• Research/project main challenge(s)
• Software application(s) used also provide
  relationship role (analyst, developer,
  contributor, user, support/ advisor, non-user
  researcher) if applicable
• Number of current users number of expected users
• Infrastructure/platform(s) used/desired

8
Triage Questionnaire

• What is the degree of applicability of the work
  to OMII-UK/NGS?
• Suggested other partner(s) and partner
  institution(s) (if applicable)
• Research/project objective observation/clarifica
  tion required
• Related/relevant software application(s)
• Estimation of probable users suggested target
  for eventual users
• Infrastructure/platform used
• Research/project main obstacle(s)/issue(s)
  (maximum of 3) Research/project main
  technological obstacle(s)/issue(s) (maximum of 3)
• Potential solution(s) (maximum of 3)
• Salient points, comments or brief proposal
  (elevator speech)

9
Case 2 Identified Obstacles

• Research/Project Obstacles
• Lack of continuity of support. They would use
  grid resources more if they were confident about
  stability and continuity.
• Started second phase of project to look at making
  the tools accessible. More marketing and
  streamlining of the tools.
• Technical Obstacles
• Have lost key people who tinkered with the code
  to get it to run.
• Amount of time spent getting the computational
  systems working and efficient.
• Future work might be more sensitive (possible
  forging of polymorphs, pharmaceutical data), so
  security will become increasingly important.

10
Case 2 Potential Approaches

• Installation and wrapping support for specific
  applications in different contexts eg. NGS,
  Legion and security eg easier authentication
• Consultancy and support gluing it all together
• Partnership with their consultancy

11
Case 2 Project Brief

• Replace DMAREL with DMACRYS, which is capable of
  dealing with much larger molecules and crystal
  structures, and using better models for the
  intermolecular forces.
• Expand the BPEL workflow to perform
  post-processing of the results, such as
  consistency checks and the re-submission of
  minima that are transition states. Enhance the
  presentation during the search and the storage
  for retrieval of the results.
• Port the deployment to run on both Legion and
  Condor pool for testing, and design it to then
  also run on the NGS so that polymorph
  calculations can be performed by the wider range
  of users.
• Consider whether either larger machine would be
  able to also offer the alternative search method
  Crystal Predictor.

12
First Phase ENGAGE Development Projects

• High Throughput Humanities for e-Research
• Exposing bioinformatic programs as Web Services
• Protein Molecule Simulation on the Grid
• Enable workflows in a Shared Genomics causality
  workbench
• Linking and Querying Ancient Texts
• SWARMCloud
• Rapid Chemistry Portals by Engaging Users

13
Second Phase ENGAGE Development Projects

• Monte Carlo Treatment Planning
• Crystal Energy Landscape Application
• Epigraphy and papyrology image processing
• Strengthening and support for eMinerals RMCS
  system
• Configuration parameters for the GENIE simulator
• Lab Blog Book
• Strengthening and supporting the text and data
  analysis toolkit OSCAR

14
First Phase ENGAGE Development Projects

• HiTheR implemented different document similarity
  algorithms, 75 reduction in run-time on small
  Condor cluster, positive researcher evaluations -
  discovered various chains of related articles and
  misclassified articles, looking to transfer to
  NGS
• Exposing bioinformatic programs as Web Services
  Nine protein sequence analysis applications
  hosted on 144 CPU cluster, workflows created now
  in daily use by postgraduates, has impressed
  infrastructure providers
• ProSim Tools connected and made available in
  portal, workflows evaluated, workshop ran from
  20-24 April with 40 attendees
• Shared Genomics workbenches integrated leading
  to new ideas for innovative user interfaces based
  on coverflow techniques
• LaQuAT three databases integrated, in different
  languages. researcher about to complete formal
  evaluation
• RCPER 3 portals complete, 1 portal underway 1
  portal evaluated and about to be used by 100
  undergraduates dissemination at ScotChem workshop

15
ENGAGE Summary

• From interview to exemplar project showing the
  use of e-Infrastructure
• Provide publicly available information to improve
  uptake

16
www.engage.ac.uk