HAZARD IDENTIFICATION MEETING for DSC AND ATIS

1
Agenda Item 10 - EATMP Issues
Verbal report FRAP
2
Successive FRAP Review Cycles
INTERFACE PROCESS
END of APRIL
3
Recommendations

• SRU to deliver Phase 1 FRAP SC by 20th of
  February
• SRC by 15th March
• to send initial comments
• to decide if a specialised group to review the
  FRAP safety case or remain via correspondence
• if YES above to send nominations for attendance
• STR to decide on a time-scale for drafting the
  SRC response to the Phase 1 FRAP SC (preferably
  by end of April 2001)

4
The Eight-States Free Route Airspace
ProjectProject Status Update

• José Dos SantosEUROCONTROL AMN Unit

5
FRAP Safety Policy

• Submitted to SRC in July 1999
• Overall safety objectives of FRAP Safety Policy
• Implementation in accordance with EATMP Safety
  Policy
• ATM 2000 Number of ATM-related accidents and
  incidents should not increase and, where
  possible, should decrease

6
Progress of FRAP Safety Assessment
7
The Eight-States Free Route Airspace
ProjectSafety Assessment Update

• Liz DaviesEUROCONTROL AMN Unit

8
Outline of Safety Assessment - Part 1

• Comparative assessment- concentrating on the
  differences between Free Routes and the current
  Fixed Routes structure
• Generic assessment - at 8-States level.
  Implementation in specific States may require
  further work

9
Outline of Safety Assessment - Part 1

• Define FRA system in terms of its Functions what
  needs to happen for FRA to operate correctly
  (people, procedures, equipment)?
• Identify Failure Conditions what could go wrong
  with each Function?
• Compare risk associated with each Failure
  Condition between Free Routes and Fixed
• Identify where risk could increase or is high

10
Outline of Safety Assessment - Part 1
FRA
Exiting FRA
Within FRA
Entering FRA
Planning and pre-FRA
Airport
11
Outline of Safety Assessment - Part 1

• Comparison of the risk between Free Routes and
  Fixed
• Is the Failure Condition more or less likely to
  occur under Free Routes than Fixed?
• If the Failure Condition does occur, are its
  consequences more or less severe under Free
  Routes than Fixed?

12
Outline of Safety Assessment - Part 1

• Safety sessions involving operational input
• Civil controllers - May 2000
• Civil pilots - June 2000
• Military pilots - June 2000
• Military controllers Sep 2000
• Database used to record and track information

13
Outline of Safety Assessment - Part 1

• 1 Frequency or Consequence greater in FRAC
• 2 Frequency or Consequence unknown in FRAC
• 3a Frequency and Consequence same in FRAC but
  Consequence is high
• 3b Frequency and Consequence same in FRAC but
  opportunity for risk reduction identified

• 4 Frequency and Consequence less in FRAC

14
Outline of Safety Assessment - Part 1

• About 70 of Failure Conditions require further
  study
• Having a comparative approach reduced uncertainty
  in the safety assessment process

15
Safety Assessment - Part 2

• For the 70 Failure Conditions identified as
  requiring further study

• Assess risks in FRAC using ESARR4 approach
• Integrate with findings of simulations and human
  performance studies
• Determine the need for Safety Requirements
• Develop model Safety Case for use by 8-States

• Deliverable will form part of Feasibility Report
  in September 2001

16
Planning for FRAP Phase 2

• The scope of future Safety Assessment will be
  determined by
• Response of the SRC to Safety Assessment Parts 1
  and 2
• Results of the FRAP Feasibility Study