a guide to smart contract security audits

1
A Developers guide to Smart Contract Security
Audits
Cyphershield.tech
2

• Getting Started
• We will first do a smart contract audit for
  bulk-uploading NFTs. Finding defects,
  vulnerabilities, and dangers in the code before
  deploying it to the Ethereum mainnet is a crucial
  step in the auditing of smart contracts.
• A Decentralized app audit services does not
  provide a 100 assurance that the contract will
  be free of errors or vulnerabilities. But it does
  ensure that the smart contract is safe and has
  been thoroughly examined.
• A Smart contract Audit's general format
• The following list of expected components for a
  smart contract audit report include information
  about found vulnerabilities, a disclaimer, and
  suggested remedies.
• Disclaimer This section is important for stating
  that the audit is not a legally binding document
  and provides no guarantee
• Overview of the audit A brief look at the
  contract and the best practices that have been
  observed in its creation

3

• Critical-level vulnerabilities Outline critical
  vulnerabilities found in the contract, such as a
  bug that allows attackers to steal currency
• Medium-level vulnerabilities Vulnerabilities
  that could damage the contract but with a
  limitation
• Low-level vulnerabilities Issues that dont
  affect the contract
• Inspecting the code line by line Analysis of the
  lines of code with potential improvements
• Disclaimer
• On the Ethereum blockchain, smart contracts are
  implemented and put into action. Due to the
  possibility of new attack vectors being
  introduced by updates to the Ethereum platform,
  an audit cannot expressly guarantee that the
  smart contract will always be safe.
• This article is intended for discussion purposes
  only and is not intended to serve as a warranty
  on the usability or safety of the code contained
  in this smart contract.
• Overview
• The project only has one file, NftUpload.sol,
  which is made up of 114 lines of Solidity code.
  Based on the natspec documentation, pertinent
  functions and state variables have comments added
  to them.

4

• The code is nicely written and understandable.
  The deploy and mint mechanisms are pretty
  straightforward and shouldn't cause any
  significant problems.
• My last piece of advice is to focus more on
  function visibility and consider adopting the
  ERC-721 extension for bulk minting.
• A smart contract auditor must consider typical
  attack elements such access control problems,
  integer overflows and underflows, and reentrancy
  flaws (for DApps written in Solidity)
• Decentralized finance's use of smart contracts
  makes them particularly susceptible to
  front-running attempts.
• A bot preempts a transaction as it is being
  packed in a front-running attack. Before the
  attacked transaction is performed, the bot sets a
  higher gas cost to finish the transaction at a
  preferred rate.
• Due to the Blockchain dapp auditing company
  transaction-based architecture, such assaults are
  feasible. Sandwich attacks are the most common
  type of front-running attack.

5

• Additional fantastic articles from LogRocket
• Don't miss a moment with The Replay, a curated
  newsletter from LogRocket
• Learn how LogRocket's Galileo cuts through the
  noise to proactively resolve issues in your app
• Use React's useEffect to optimize your
  application's performance
• Switch between multiple versions of Node
• Discover how to animate your React app with
  AnimXYZ
• Explore Tauri, a new framework for building
  binaries
• Compare NestJS vs. Express.js
• What is a sandwich attack?
• A front-running strategy and frequent attack
  vector on decentralised exchanges using the
  automated market maker mechanism is the sandwich
  assault.
• When a predator discovers a pending transaction
  on the blockchain P2P network, Security Audit for
  dApp they try to surround it by making an order
  before it (front-running) and an order after it
  (following it) (back-running).

6

• As a developer working on smart contracts in the
  DeFi space, I can see how dealing with the
  blockchain's transaction openness by encrypting
  data so that bots can't process it could be a way
  to protect users from sandwich attacks.
• There are now plans to implement encryption using
  zk-SNARKs, a zero-knowledge-proof method.
  Although this tactic is not yet developed enough,
  there is active community discussion about it.
• Conclusion
• Dapp verification services require smart
  contract audits in particular. While having a
  smart contract is not a sign of worth, it is
  quite significant.
• I urge developers to keep learning and expanding
  their understanding of the most recent
  developments in contract security and best
  practices.