The Value Of Waivers With Higher Risk Activities - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The Value Of Waivers With Higher Risk Activities

Description:

Waivers are strongly recommended for higher risk activities. But, do these waivers hold up in courtwhen you get injured. Read on. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2
Slides: 24
Provided by: injurylawyer
Category: Other

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Value Of Waivers With Higher Risk Activities


1
The Value Of Waivers With Higher Risk Activities
2
  • Do you enjoy skiing? Snowboarding? Horseback
    riding? Do your kids enjoy these activities?

3
  • If so, you have probably signed a waiver at some
    point or other, indemnifying the business
    offering the recreational activity from
    liability, if you were to get hurt in the pursuit
    of those activities. But do these waivers hold up
    in court?
  • For a while in Ontario, they didnt.

4
What Happened To Waivers In Ontario?
  • The Ontario Superior Court, in 2017, poked some
    holes in the liability protection purveyors of
    higher risk activities had relied on for decades.

5
  • The court allowed two lawsuits to proceed
    against ski resorts in Ontario, finding that the
    waivers the two plaintiffs agreed to were negated
    by the resorts failing to observe certain
    requirements under the Consumer Protection Act.

6
  • For insurance companies who provided liability
    coverage for higher risk activities, this was a
    big concern.
  • After all, if the waivers werent going to be of
    any value, the cost of insurance would surely
    have to skyrocket, making these sports
    effectively uninsurable.

7
  • On appeal, the court ruled on March 28th that
    the plaintiffs in those cases were subject to the
    waivers that they agreed to.

8
  • Court of Appeal for Ontario Justice Ian
    Nordheimer wrote in his decision that if the
    conflict stood, then resorts would be held
    liable for something that they thought they had
    lawfully protected themselves against and that
    this was absurd. (SOURCE)

9
What Are The Implications Of The Court Decisions?
  • Two things First, companies that offer
    recreational services that have a reasonable
    expectation of some risk for participants should
    not rely wholly on the idea that they are
    protected by waivers.

10
  • They are not the be all and end all those
    companies should be performing their due
    diligence to make sure that they have clear risk
    management policies and that they review them
    regularly.

11
  • In other words, these companies have a duty of
    care and have to make sure they are doing
    everything practicable to keep participants safe.

12
  • These companies also need to make sure that the
    participants in the activities are aware of the
    waiver. Its not good enough to say By buying
    this ticket, youre accepting these risks.

13
  • Second, individuals signing waivers to
    participate in higher risk activities need to be
    aware of the difference between true negligence,
    such as chair lifts that havent been serviced in
    three months, resulting in a breakdown that
    caused injuries and unforeseeable issues,

14
  • such as a tree limb falling in the middle of the
    day from old age (not high winds or a storm),
    half way down a less frequented run and the
    resort was not yet aware of the problem.

15
  • As adults, we all have to be responsible for our
    actions and our choices. When a choice weve
    made, including hurtling down an icy slope with
    no lessons or experience, goes wrong, there has
    to be some element of that blame that falls
    squarely on the individual.

16
  • That said, if presented with a case where a
    person was injured and is claiming negligence by
    the business providing the recreational activity,
    the courts will look at a couple of things
    including whether the waiver was comprensible to
    the person (or was it full of legalese?)

17
  • whether and how the waiver was given to the
    participant (or were there just at your own
    risk signs everywhere?) and when the waiver was
    presented.

18
  • In other words, did the participant know and
    understand the waiver before they committed
    themselves to participating in the activity?

19
What About When Parents Sign For Their Kids?
  • Children cannot legally enter into a contract,
    which is what accepting a waiver entails.
  • Parents are asked to sign these liability forms
    on their behalf before their children participate
    in martial arts classes, ski or riding lessons,
    to name a few.

20
  • But are the businesses truly protected and can
    parents be barred from suing on behalf of their
    children, in the event of injury?
  • This is a point of law that is still in dispute.

21
  • It still comes down to negligence, but even with
    kids, there is an assumption that you know the
    risks if your child is participating in something
    that could be dangerous. As long as that activity
    has been engaged in as safely as possible, and
    all reasonable precautions are taken by the
    service provider, the waiver should stand.

22
  • Also keep in mind that, since a limitation
    period to sue does not begin to run for a minor
    until theyre 18, what would prevent them from
    waiting until their 18th birthday and then suing
    the ski resort in their own right? In this
    instance, by arguing that they can not be bound
    by a waiver they never signed or legally agreed
    to.

23
  • These are incredibly complex points of law, in
    the realm of personal injury, so if youre ever
    injured in the course of an activity, whether or
    not you signed a liability waiver, check in with
    a personal injury lawyer to make sure that
    everything in your case is double checked, with
    is dotted and ts crossed.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com