Review from last class. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

Review from last class.

Description:

Need to maintain 1st order ... Brad Pitt and 503 Jeans. Pitt (CS1), leading man, celebrity, rich, pretty = desirable (US), 503s (CS2) Performance-void ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:74
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: michaelr5
Category:
Tags: brad | class | last | pitt | review

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Review from last class.


1
Review from last class.
  • Higher order conditioning
  • Overshadowing (Stimulus Features)
  • Blocking Latent Inhibition (Prior Experience)

2
Higher Order Conditioning
  • Need to maintain 1st order conditioning
  • Tone-Food
  • Note that Light is still never directly paired
    with food!

Light (CS2)
But what would happen to the Tone? - Extinction!
Phase 1 Tone?Food
Phase 2 Light?Tone
Tone?Food
3
Overshadowing (Stimulus Features)
  • A more salient stimulus will interfere with
    learning about less salient stimuli
  • e.g. compound stimuli
  • Loud noise dim light ? food
  • Light not learned about

4
Blocking (Prior Experience)
  • Novel stimuli presented in compound with an
    existing CS will not be learned about
  • CS must be informative (i.e. add new information)
  • Light wont be learned about

5
Latent Inhibition (Prior Experience)
  • Pre-exposure to a CS makes it harder to condition
  • Learn first that CS does not signal US

MORE TRIALS!
Phase 1 Buzzer ? No Food Phase 2 Buzzer ? Food
Regular Classical Conditioning Buzzer ? Food
6
Chapter 4
  • Pavlovian (Classical) Applications

7
Fear
8
Conditioned Suppression
  • Conditional Response (CR) involves suppress
    behaviour that would otherwise be performed
  • 1) Train rat to press bar for food
  • 2) Classical Conditioning Pair light with shock
  • Scared rats freeze
  • i.e. when shock is coming, the rat will freeze
  • While the rat is frozen with fear, it will NOT
    be pushing the bar
  • After conditioning, the rat should freeze in
    response to the light (CR)
  • Compare the amount of bar pressing when light is
    off and when light is on

9
Conditioned Emotional Response
  • Emotional reactions
  • Learned
  • Classical conditioning

10
Little Albert
  • Watson Rayner (1920)
  • Hard line behaviourist
  • Nature vs Nurture
  • Fear previously thought to be
  • Innate
  • Faulty reasoning
  • Initial studies showed that infants NOT afraid of
    many innately frightening stimuli
  • E.g. snakes, fire, rats
  • Conditioned fear

11
Methodology
  • Albert (11 months old)
  • Present rat observe
  • No initial fear
  • Present rat bang metal bar (loud noise)
  • UR startle
  • Present rat Albert cries, avoids
  • CR
  • Present other furry objects
  • generalization

12
Terminology
  • US noise
  • UR startle response/fear
  • CS rat
  • CR fear/avoidance

13
Conclusions
  • Fear response produced through classical
    conditioning
  • Watson suggests fear, hate, love conditionable

14
Albert Issues
  • Sample size
  • Replication
  • Generalization to other objects

15
Prejudice
  • Prejudice related to hate and fear
  • Hate and fear conditionable
  • Staats Staats (1958)
  • Paired positive, negative, neutral words with
    nationalities
  • Subjects rate nationalities
  • Ratings correspond with conditioning

16
In real life
  • Where do these associations come from?
  • Political speeches
  • Media coverage
  • Negative images, words, impressions paired with
    identifiable group

17
Counter Conditioning
  • Mary Cover Jones (1924)
  • Eliminate phobia via classical conditioning
  • Peter feared rabbits
  • Peter eats snack (US) present rabbit (CS)
  • Associate positive US with CS

18
Systematic Desensitization
  • A type of Counter-conditioning
  • Also Aversion therapy
  • Relaxation techniques
  • Gradual introduction of phobic stimulus
  • Imagination up to real situation

19
Flooding
  • Flood patient with exposure to fear-inducing
    stimulus
  • Not counter-conditioning
  • Kind of like habituation but
  • not discreet trials!

20
Advertising
21
First-Order C.C. in Ads
  • Product (initially neutral -- CS)
  • Pair with stimulus that elicits positive emotion
    (US)
  • Consumer sees product, has positive CR

22
Example
  • Sausages
  • US funny situation
  • UR happiness
  • CS brand
  • CR happiness, amusement, positive emotion

23
Example
24
Second-Order C.C.
  • Use previously conditioned celebrity, situation,
    etc.
  • CS1 US
  • Now, pair brand (CS2) with CS1

25
Example
  • Sprint
  • Peyton Manning CS1
  • Positive feeling CR
  • Attractive, successful, lifestyle US
  • Positive feeling UR
  • Sprint mobility CS2
  • Assumption buy phone, be rich, popular, laser
    rocket arm

26
Example
  • Japander.com
  • Brad Pitt and 503 Jeans
  • Pitt (CS1), leading man, celebrity, rich, pretty
    desirable (US), 503s (CS2)
  • Performance-void

27
Problems
  • Celebs dont always maintain status
  • Tom Cruise spoof
  • Michael Jackson

28
Paraphilia
29
Paraphilia
  • Incorrect love
  • Fetishism, masochism, pedophilia, etc.
  • More common in males
  • Freud unconscious forces
  • Classical conditioning association formed

30
Example Masochism
  • Generally, CS is previously neutral
  • But, a US, by pairing with another strong US, can
    become a CS
  • Pavlov shock (CS) for food (US)
  • Masochism pain (CS) for sexual pleasure (US)

31
Counter Conditioning
  • Pair undesired CS with strongly aversive US
    (e.g., nausea)
  • Aversion therapy
  • Awareness not
  • necessary for
  • conditioning

32
Treatment
  • Very difficult with some types of paraphilia
  • Pedophilia, rape?
  • Evolutionary Psychology
  • Male attraction to youthfulness
  • Desire for dominance and power

33
Taste Aversion
34
Typically
  • Long-delay or trace conditioning
  • US is food poisoning, illness, etc.
  • UR is nausea induced pain
  • CS is novel food/flavour
  • CR is avoidance, nausea
  • Violation of contiguity?

35
Explanations?
  • Sensitization
  • Aftertaste
  • Biological preparedness
  • Taste aversion a special case

36
Biological Preparedness in Taste-Aversion
  • Garcia Koelling (1966)

37
Explanation
  • Biological predisposition
  • Taste and nausea
  • Audiovisual and shock
  • Must know about CS-US relationship before
    predicting nature of CR
  • Certain stimuli more easily associated than others

38
Immune Function
39
Allergic Reaction
  • Release of histamines
  • Bodys immune response to allergens
  • Not all allergic responses biological
  • Can be learned

40
Examples
  • Patient sneezes when presented artificial rose
  • Allergies to pets sometimes not as bad if dont
    know if pets are in house

41
Russell et al. (1984)
  • Expose guinea pigs to BSA
  • Becomes allergen (US for histamine release)
  • Pair BSA with odour of fish or sulphur (CSs)
  • Expose guinea pigs to odours and get increased
    histamines (CR) in bloodstream
  • Preparatory value of classical conditioning
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com