Title: Socioeconomic status and medical expenditures
1Socio-economic status and medical expenditures
Health Systems Research, Public Health School, UCL
Vincent Lorant
June 2002
Health System Research, Public Health School,
Université Catholique de Louvain
2Objective
- Why and how socio-economic status (SES) should
be considered in risk adjustement model ?
3Contents
- Rationale for SES adjustement fairness and
quality - International review of SES adjustement
- Methodological consideration
- Indicators to be used
4Why adjust for socio-economic status ?
- Horizontal equity SES catches unobserved
differences in health - Vertical equity differences in ability to pay.
- SES influence the bundle of care
- For given use of care, lower SES individuals have
a poorer health outcome
5(No Transcript)
6(No Transcript)
7What other countries do ?
- In a recent international review 10 countries out
of 20 included some SES adjustement - Employment and welfare had the edge
- 8 countries adjusted for geographical features
- SES weights are similar to the morbidity weights
in the British formula
8How to adjust for SES ?
- Separate the income effect from the deprivation
effect - Poor relevance of observed pattern of care to
model capitation formulae - SES at the ecological level should be considered
- Availability of data is a weak argument
9- Summarize your points.
- State your conclusion. Make it relevant to your
audience.
10Spatial autocorrelation of socio-economic status,
health and health care 589 Belgian
municipalities
Source Lorant, Social Science and Medicine, 2001
11Which SES indicator to use ?
- Continuous prefered to binary
- Time-invariant
- Applying to active and inactive
- Assessing status and deprivation
- Educational status and deprivation are good
choices
12Recommendations
- The formula should be designed on expected care
or on the least unequitable type of care - Use more valid and continous SES indicators
- Models should consider spatial clustering
- Models aiming not only to avoid cream- skimming
but also to promote quality of care