FORMAL LOGIC I: PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC

1
FORMAL LOGIC IPROPOSITIONAL LOGIC

• Logic takes care of itself all we have to do is
  to look and see how it does it.
• Ludwig Wittgenstein

2
Evaluation of Deductive Arguments

• argument A is a deductive argument df.
• A is an argument in which the conclusion is
  supposed to follow from the premises with
  necessity / with certainty
• deductive argument A is valid df.
• it is not possible for all of As premises to be
  true and its conclusion false
• deductive argument A is sound df.
• (i) A is valid, and (ii) all of As premises are
  true

3

• (P1) If Grover is dead, then Grover does not
• vote.
• (P2) Grover is dead.
• (C) Therefore, Grover does not vote.

4
Formal Logic

• with many deductive arguments, validity is a
  matter simply of form, of structure
• formal logic studies these cases in which
  validity depends solely on form
• not all valid arguments are formally valid
• (P) Grover is a bachelor.
• (C) Therefore, Grover does not have a wife.

5

• argument A is formally valid if, in virtue of As
  logical form alone, it is impossible for all of
  As premises to be true and its conclusion false
• (P1) All 19th Cent. American presidents are
  dead people.
• (P2) All dead people are people who do not
  vote.
• (C) Therefore, all 19th Cent. American
  presidents are people who do not vote.

6
Why study formal logic?

• gives us a more robust understanding of validity
  in general
• is comparatively straightforward / easy to
  understand

7
Introduction to Propositional(or Sentential or
Truth-Functional) Logic

• deals with propositions whole statements
  meaningful declarative sentences
• S is a simple proposition df. S does not contain
  any other proposition as a component
• Grover is dead.
• S is a compound proposition df. S contains at
  least one simple proposition as a component
• Grover is dead and Stevenson is dead.
• It is not the case that Grover is beautiful.
• ? The woman who married Grover is beautiful.

8
Propositional Forms, Variables, Constants, and
Substitution Instances

• a propositional form is a pattern for a whole
  class of propositions
• (p q) v p ) p q )
• a propositional variable is a lowercase letter
  (e.g., p, q, r, s) for which a
  proposition may be substituted

9

• a propositional constant is a capital letter that
  stands for a particular, definite proposition
• G Grover is dead. S Stevenson is dead.
• a substitution instance of a propositional form
  is the result of uniformly replacing the
  propositional variables in that form with
  propositions
• the same proposition may be replaced with
  different variables, but no two different
  propositions may be replaced by the same one
  variable

10
some examples

• Grover is dead and Stevenson is dead.
• G S p q
• Grover and Stevenson are beautiful men.
• B M p q
• Grover is dead and Grover is dead.
• G G p p or p q
• Grover and Frances are a couple now.
• C p

11
Propositional Connectives(Logical Operators or
Truth-Functional Connectives)

• a definition for each connective
• this simply specifies the truth conditions for
  any proposition in which the connective occurs
• this is a way of giving the meaning of the
  connective by specifying its use
• a truth table sets out all of the possible truth
  value combinations for the simple component
  propositions and shows, for each combination, the
  value of the compound proposition

12
Conjunctionand, but, also, as well,
13
some examples

• Grover and Stevenson are dead. G S
• Grover and Frances are a couple now. C
• All that I have left are photographs and
  memories. A
• ?? Grover and Frances are in love. ??

14
Disjunctionor, either or
Inclusive Disjunction ? either this or that,
and perhaps both
15
some examples

• Either Kristen wants to avoid you or shes out of
  town. W v O
• Special consideration is appropriate for elderly
  or infirm people. E v I
• ? Either Britney or P. Diddy is the best singer
  alive today. (B v P) (B P)

16

• Exclusive Disjunction ? either this or that, but
  not both

17
Negationnot, it is not the case that...
Grover is not alive. A It is not the case
that Grover is alive. A ? Grover is not very
attractive. N ? Frances never knew about
Grovers affair. K
18
The (Material) Conditionalif..., then...

• antecedent ? consequent

19

• Why should we count the conditional claim as
  true when the antecedent is false and the
  consequent true or, especially, when both are
  false?
• If you get an A on the final, then you get an
  A for the course.
• If Shane is younger than 31, then Shane is
  younger than 33.
• If p, then q.
• Either q is the case or p is not the case.
• It is not the case that p and not-q.

20

• p ? q is equivalent to
• q v p is equivalent to
• (p q)

• If Grover is decapitated, then Grover is dead.

21
Some Other Constructions

• unless constructions can often be treated as
  conditionals
• e.g., Calvin remains quiet unless he is spoken
  to.
• S ? Q (also Q v S)
• provided that, given that, on condition
  that, and such like phrases
• only if constructions are different
• You get to be president only if you are over 34.
• P ? O

22
Some Ifs that Are Not Conditionals

• uncertainty / iffy
• e.g., Jen is not certain if Jack is competent.
• Bring a friend if you have one.
• I would appreciate tickets for the second
  performance, if there is one.

23
Parentheses(punctuation for propositional logic)

• allow us to specify the scope of an operator
• the truth value of a compound proposition is tied
  to the main operator
• Mary says John is beautiful.
• Mary, says John, is beautiful.
• or
• Mary says, John is beautiful.
• theres a big difference between (p v q)
• and p v q

24
Equivalence (UA, p. 163)

• p ? q is equivalent to q v p
• two compound propositions p and q are logically
  equivalent if and only if p and q always have the
  same truth value
• two equivalent propositions have the same
  meaning

25
an example

• Neither borrower nor lender be.
• You should be neither a borrower nor a lender.
• ? You should not be a borrower and you should not
  be a lender.
• (B v L) B L

26
Propositional Arguments and Checking for Validity

• we want a decision procedure for determining
  whether a propositional argument is valid
• isolate the form of the argument (translation)
• do the truth table (for the entire argument)
• determine by inspection whether there are any
  cases in which all of the premises are true but
  the conclusion is false

27

• an argument form is a pattern for a whole bunch
  of particular arguments
• a substitution instance of an argument form is
  the argument that results from uniformly
  replacing the propositional variables with
  propositions

28
Checking for ValidityThe Guiding Principles
(UA, p. 151)

• (GP1) an argument A is valid if A is a
• substitution instance of a valid
  argument form
• an argument can be a substitution instance of a
  valid form and of an invalid form at the same
  time
• (P) Grover and Stevenson are dead.
• (C) Therefore, Grover is dead.
• (GP2) an argument form F is valid if and only if
  F
• has no substitution instances in which all of
  the
• premises are true and the conclusion is false

29
Some Common Argument FormsConjunction (UA, pp.
150-151)
30
Disjunctive Syllogism (UA, p. 155)
31
Affirming a Disjunct (UA, p. 156)(NOT valid for
inclusive disjunction)
32
Modus Ponens (UA, pp. 167-168)
33
Affirming the Consequent (UA, p. 168)(NOT valid
a common mistake)
34
Modus Tollens (UA, p. 168)
35
Denying the Antecedent (UA, p. 168)(NOT valid
another common mistake)
36
Hypothetical Syllogism (UA, p. 169)
37
(No Transcript)