CLS Partial Organization Chart

1
CLS Partial Organization Chart
Construction Phase
CLS Director M. Bancroft
Functional Responsibility
Communication Link
Project Leader M. de Jong
Project Administrator L. Carter
Project Manager B. Hawkins
Project Admin. Asst. A. Shenher
Health, Safety Environment M. Bennmerouche
Commission Leader Les Dallin
Construction Manager M. Heikoop
Work Pkg. 6 Leader E. Hallin
UAC Kathy Gough
Project Engineer Dan Lowe
Beamline Developer(s) Beamlines 1 to gt6
Beamline Scientific Advisors
Insertion Device Leader Ingvar Blomqvist
Beamline Consultants

TRADES - CONTRACTORS - SUPPLIERS (Beamlines)
2
CMCF related Organization Chart
Beamline Developer Pawel Grochulski
Insertion Device Leader Ingvar Blomqvist
Beamline Scientific Advisors
Beamline Consultants Gerd Rosenbaum
3
Beamline Development

• Stage 1 Concept Design
• Stage 2 Preliminary Design
• Stage 3 Final Design
• Stage 4 Construct/Fabricate/Test/Install
• Stage 5 Commission
• Stage 6 Operate

4
Stage 1 Concept Design

• Scope
• Roles
• Organization
• Reference Specifications
• Cost Estimate
• Schedule
• Documents to be issued or revised
• Conceptual Design Report
• Orientation Meeting Report
• Clarification of Issues
• Meeting Notes
• Beamline Operations Manual
• Beamline Layout (block diagram)
• Commissioning Plan
• QA Plan
• Review Concept Design (FAC)
• Approve Concept Design (CLS)
• Recommend Preliminary Design Start (CLS)

5
Reference Specifications
Insertion Device or Source point Absorber Slits Mi
rrors Monochromator Detectors Shielding Positionin
g, bending and feedback systems Endstation
instrumentation
6
Stage 2 Preliminary Design

• QA Plan
• Buy or Fabricate?
• Items for configuration control
• Control system and Data acquisitions
• Cost Estimate
• Schedule
• Documents to be issued or revised
• Preliminary design report
• Preliminary Commissioning plan
• Preliminary Safety Report
• Procurement Strategy
• 3D layouts (gross dimensions only)
• PFD/PID drawings
• Component specifications
• QA Plan
• Procedures manual
• Review Preliminary Design (Technical Expert
  Panel)
• Approve Preliminary Design (CLS)
• Recommend Final Design Start

7
Preliminary Design ReportReview
Take reference specifications for each device and
generate a description of the required component
consistent with the Quality Assurance
Plan Examine each component to determine its
possible impact on personnel and machine
safety Generate one document for each major
component and an overall document for the entire
line Include budget and schedule
estimates Suggest reviewer(s) for the preliminary
design report Submit a copy for review by safety
officers
8
Stage 3 Final Design

• Refine Procurement Strategy (Design/Build)
• Update Beamline Operations manual
• Update Cost Estimate
• Update schedule
• Documents to be issued or revised
• Final Design Report
• Commissioning Plan
• Safety Report
• RFP documents for design/build/buy items
• Detailed fabrication documents for fabricated
  items
• Detail design documents for buy items
• Component specifications
• QA Plan
• Procedures manual
• Review Final Design
• Approve Final Design
• Recommend Beamline for Construction

9
Final Design ReportReview
Integrate Reviewers Comments and return to
reviewer if necessary Address any safety related
concerns Modify design (if necessary) for
consistency with CLS safety and access
requirements, consistent with the Quality
Assurance Plan Generate Final Design
Report Update budget and schedule
estimates Submit copy for safety review (obtain
regulatory approval to construct
beamline) Generate preliminary installation,
commissioning and operating plans
10
Stage 4 Construct/Fabricate/Test/Install

• Build and test components
• Integrate components and test
• Install and test in beamline
• Align beamline to monuments
• Develop operating procedures
• File amendment to CLS Safety report with CNSC
• Documents to be issued or revised
• QA Plan
• Training documents
• Procedures manual
• Testing validation documentation
• Review test procedures commissioning plan
• Recommend beamline commissioning start

11
Fabrication Design (Drawings)
Issue fabrication drawings or request for
tender Update budget and schedule estimates Issue
Construction schedule and budget Update
installation, commissioning and operating plan
12
Stage 5 Commission

• Align beamline to photon beam
• Measure conformance to reference specifications
• Commission beamline
• File Safety Commissioning report with CNSC
• Documents to be issued or revised
• User Training Manual
• Operating Manual and Procedures
• Testing /verification procedures
• commissioning and alignment procedures
• Safety measurements (report)
• As built drawings
• Acceptance documentation for the beamline
• Deficiency list
• check beamline performance relative to reference
  specifications

13
General issues for all beamlines

• Quality Assurance Program
• Process for beamline design teams
• Resources for beamline design teams
• Construction/commissioning Schedule
• Construction/operation Staffing

14
Some Technical details for the CMCF

• Current plan calls for in-vacuum small gap
  insertion device
• Monochromator similar to that used on the SBC-CAT
  and SER-CAT beamlines
• Endstation similar to that at the SER-CAT
• UMA web site tool

15
CLS Design Parameters
16
CLS Reference Specifications
17
CLS Source Point Sizes and Machine Functions
18
Insertion Devices at the CLS

• Insertion device designer has been hired (Ingvar
  Blomqvist)
• Plans are to design in house and make
  buy/fabricate decision based on resource
  constraints. For example, support structure
  design and fabrication will likely be outsourced.
• Current plans are for at least these IDs
• Superconducting wiggler for Hard X-ray XAFS
  (similar to that at MAX)
• Small gap in-vacuum undulator for Protein
  Crystallography
• An elliptically polarizing undulator for Soft
  X-ray Spectromicroscopy
• A conventional undulator for the SGM

19
Front Ends

• Design and construction to be out-sourced
• Possible vendors are being qualified includes at
  least one consortium with a local connection
• An expert from the APS (Dr. Deming Shu) has
  assisted us in the specification of the front end
  design
• Expect to be ready to go out to an outside vendor
  for the design by February 2001

20
Canadian Macromolecular Crystallography Facility

• Plan to build an ID and a second beamline later
• Pawel Grochulski has been hired and will
  participate in construction and commissioning of
  a model beamline at the APS (SER-CAT)
• Automation and robotic sample mounting will be
  part of the design of both beamlines
• SSRL developed software (BLU-ICE) is being
  considered for the CMCF
• A new proposal must be written and submitted for
  the second beam line

21
Insertion Device Delivery Plan

• Have hired an internationally recognized
  Insertion Device specialist Ingvar Blomqvist
  (currently still in Sweden)
• Ingvar will design the required magnetic
  structures which may be assembled off-site
• Have identified four possible vendors Danfysik,
  STI, Accel and SPring8
• These structures will be tested and adjusted
  on-site in the CLS Magnet Measurement Room some
  final magnetic field adjustment may be done on
  location

22
Small Gap Undulator Parameters
6 mm gap 18 mm gap
12 mm gap 24 mm gap
23
Small Gap Undulator vertical field
Radia simulation of small gap undulator vertical
field (6 mm gap)
Radia simulation vertical field integral (6 mm
gap)
24
Small Gap Undulator vertical field 18 mm gap
Vertical field
Vertical field integral
25
SGU Magnetic Structure
26
Risks with an SGU

• you need a large volume UHV vacuum chamber
• you need a double set of girders, one set inside
  the vacuum chamberand one set outside. The
  alignment of the two magnet assemblies relative
  toeach other is difficult.
• some the RF fingers and the conducting sheet
  carrying the image currentthrough the undulator
  presents engineering challenge.
• the control of gap and taper must be more precise
  due to the short period and small gaps.
• protection of the magnet blocks during baking by
  water cooling.
• Standard undulator has about 200 poles in the
  magnet assembly and takes about 4 months of bench
  time to assemble, test and shim. With an SGU,
  the same process takes about 7 months because
  there are typically more poles (shorter
  periodicity) and the final assembly and alignment
  is complicated by the vacuum tank.
• SGU has a potentially different impact on the
  machine than a large gap device IF it is the
  defining vertical aperture during some part of
  its operation.
• Shimming can be done with the same degree of
  precision so there is no greater magnetic impact
  on the ring for an SGU compared to an LGU

27
Protein Crystallography

• PI Louis Delbaere Louis.Delbaere_at_usask.ca
• Wavelengths 1.9 0.68 Angstrom, 6.5 18 keV
• Resolution 1.6 x 104 using Si(220)
• Typical Crystal size 20 50 mm
• Design goal flux of 1013 photons/sec into a 50 x
  100 mm area
• Design will be modeled after beamlines at SBC-CAT
  and SER-CAT (APS)

28
Staffing Resources for Protein Crystallography

• Minimize engineering and drafting resources
  required by utilizing existing designs as much as
  possible
• Pawel Grochulski has been hired as a beamline
  developer
• Began work November 1, 2000
• Became familiar with PX project in first two
  months
• Spends first four months of 2001 building the
  SER-CAT beamline at the APS and doing some user
  support at the SBC-CAT as a visiting scientist

29
Issues for Protein Crystallography beamline

• Insertion device type conventional small gap in
  vacuum undulator or super conducting out of
  vacuum undulator
• A feasibility study will be done by an outside
  contractor
• Experience from MAXLAB will be used in making
  this decision (superconducting wiggler is being
  built and tested there)

30
Protein Crystallography Beamline Layout
31
Protein Crystallography Endstation
32
(No Transcript)