Architecture Research Methods ARCH 5365 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Architecture Research Methods ARCH 5365

Description:

... Research Methods. ARCH 5365. Gary W. Smith, 2006. G&W Chapter 5 ... Austin Dickey. design is the processing of many discrete decisions that produce a figural ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:441
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: larry262
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Architecture Research Methods ARCH 5365


1
Architecture Research MethodsARCH 5365
  • Gary W. Smith, 2006

2
GW Chapter 5Design in Relation to Research
  • research is a fact-based activity and design is
    a series of subjective commitments
  • Austin Dickey
  • design is the processing of many discrete
    decisions that produce a figural outcome
  • Newell and Simon

3
  • Generative Design vs. Analytical Design
  • The process of generative design is subjective
    (not based on rules)
  • The process of research (analytical) is based on
    rule/fact-based frameworks
  • Immanuel Kant thought that art (or architecture)
    production is indeterminate, but within the
    domain of reason

4
  • Design as Research vs. Research about the design
    process
  • Research activity defined by propositional
    components i.e. strategy, tactic, hypotheses,
    literature, measuring instruments
  • Generative design process is defined by human
    reason
  • research about the design process can help inform
    the design process itself helps put words to our
    methods of design

5
  • Design Activity versus Academic Credentials
  • Argument as to what is scholarly research in an
    academic architectural setting
  • Episodic Research within Generative Design
    Activity
  • Design as Analysis and Evaluation
  • Analysis of issues (programming) and
    post-occupancy evaluation (help for future
    projects)

6
  • Design as Action Research
  • Design results from analysis of specific
    factors/issues and a logical explanation (design
    concept) of how those factors are related (not
    based on theoretical or abstract knowledge)

7
  • Design as a Learned Skill
  • Concept is
  • learning to do it better by practice (thorough
    understanding of the attributes inform design)
    and
  • by reflective assessments of the process
  • Incorporates elements of both action research and
    design-decision research (analysis of those
    design decisions)

8
  • Three categories of design constraints (Lawson)
  • Generatorfactors that motivate the design
    (empirical factors such as client, users, etc.)
  • Functionformal, symbolic, practical, and radical
    (rational)
  • Domaininternal, external (materials, systems,
    etc.)
  • design is research in that we, as designers, are
    testing design options to discover their
    validity

9
  • Design in Collaboration
  • The Architect is the cultivator who encourages
    by
  • emphasizing collaborative process
  • promoting interdisciplinary design
  • having a sensitivity for the cultural as the soul
    of design

10
  • Design and History Research
  • Design and Qualitative Research
  • Design and Experimental Research
  • Design and Correlational Research
  • Design and Simulation Research
  • Design and Logical Argumentation
  • Case Study and Multi-Method Approaches to
    Research

11
BCW Chapter 7Making Good Arguments
  • Five Elements of Research Arguments
  • Claim
  • Reasons for your claim
  • Evidence to support the reasons
  • Acknowledging and responding to alternatives
  • Warranting the relevance of reasons

12
  • A claim is any sentence that makes an assertion
    that needs support
  • A main claim is the primary thesis of your paper

13
  • Reasons support the claim and, in turn, need
    evidence to support them

14
  • Acknowledging other claims and alternatives
  • The readers may think of alternative claims you
    did not think of so you must anticipate their
    questions i.e. alternatives to the port of New
    Orleans.

15
  • Warranting the relevance of reasons
  • Must present a general principle (a general set
    of circumstances) that shows that your particular
    reason is relevant to your particular claim (the
    set of circumstances also applies to your case
    and connects your claim to your reason)

16
  • When you seem to be the sort of person who
    supports your claims thoroughly and you consider
    other points of view, your readers will be more
    likely to trust you. (Groat and Wang)

17
  • Hazards
  • Watch out for inappropriate evidence and being
    too simplistic (know your research topic and your
    audience well)
  • If you dont understand the topic thoroughly you
    will make poor, ill-researched claims and will
    not be convincing

18
Notes
  • Information in these lectures was adapted from
    the following sources
  • Booth, Wayne C., Colomb, Gregory G., Williams,
    Joseph M. 2003. The Craft of Research. Second
    Edition. Chicago University of Chicago Press.
  • Groat, Linda N. and Wang, David C. 2002.
    Architectural Research Methods. New York John
    Wiley.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com