Title: Housechurches and Radical Restoration
1(No Transcript)
2Two Indisputable Facts
- Traditionalism can be a serious problem. Matt.
151-9 - Lukewarmness is deadly. Rev. 314-16
3House-churches and Radical Restoration
4Characteristics of House-churches
- Emphasis on emotions and feelings of
participants. - Edification, not worship, stressed as primary
reason for being together. - Term church of Christ is usually disdained.
- Limit size of churches to groups small enough to
meet in homes. - The Lords Supper is a focus of the edification
gathering and is usually meal-sized. - Worship is relatively informal, spontaneous, and
participatory.
5Key Principles
- We must follow the absolute standard God has
revealed. 2 Tim. 316, 17 - Edification is important, but not to the neglect
of worship, which is edifying. - Col. 316
- Christians must be willing to fight the good
fight. 1 Tim. 612 - Worship must be done decently and in order. 1
Cor. 1440
6Key Principles
- We must follow the absolute standard God has
revealed. 2 Tim. 316, 17 - Edification is important, but not to the neglect
of worship, which is edifying. - Christians fight the good fight. 1 Tim. 612
- Worship must be done decently and in order. 1
Cor. 1440 - Internal reflection, not external manipulation,
is key to renewal. Rom. 121, 2
7Smith and the Lords Supper
- To be eaten in conjunction with a fellowship
meal. - 1 Cor. 11 deals with abuse of the fellowship
meal. - Wants the Lords Supper to be center of restored
love feasts of Jude 12. - The Lords Supper gave meaning to their table
fellowship, and their table fellowship gave
meaning to the Lords Supper. Each was a picture
of the other.
8Smith and the Lords Supper
- To be eaten in conjunction with a fellowship
meal. - Some who reject the fellowship meal accept his
ideas that it must be an actual food-and-drink
meal, not a token ritual with our typical
21st-century crackers and grape juice. - Derisively called pinch and sip by some.
9Fellowship(?) Meals
- 1 Cor. 1117-34
- Condemnation of division. 1117-22
- The proper way to remember Christ. 1123-31
- Eat hunger-satisfying meals at home. 1133, 34
- Never read of anything but the bread and fruit of
the vine. 1 Cor. 1016 1123-26 - Love feasts. Jude 12
- Smith says common meals eaten in conjunction with
the Lords Supper.
10Fellowship(?) Meals
- Love feasts. Jude 12
- Smith says common meals eaten in conjunction with
the Lords Supper. - Why didnt Paul correct the abuses and not
exhort them to eat at home? 1 Cor. 1122, 34 - Three possibilities that fit the rest of the NT.
- Meals eaten outside the assemblies. Acts 246
1 Cor. 511 - The Lords Supper itself.
- The spiritual feast of worship. Cf. John 6.
11Should the Memorial Be a Meal?
- To stress supper is to miss the point.
- Physical hunger is taken care of at home. 1
Cor. 1122, 34 - The Lords Supper is about remembering. 1 Cor.
1124-29 - How much does it take to remember Jesus?
- Greater portions could actually become a
hindrance to remembrance.
12House-churches
- Smith advocates small groups.
- It is worth noting from this special greeting
that not all the Christians in Rome worshiped
together. Rom. 163-5 - Rome had a population in excess of 1,000,000.
- The issue is not so much whether we meet in an
actual house as opposed to a church building.
Rather, its the contrast between small versus
large participant versus spectator active
versus passive personal versus impersonal. Its
simply axiomatic The larger the gathering, the
less personal, interactive, and truly
participatory its likely to be.
13House-churches
- Smith advocates small groups.
- The issue is notwhether we meet in an actual
house as opposed to a church building.its the
contrast between small versus large participant
versus spectator active versus passive personal
versus impersonal The larger the gathering, the
less personal, interactive, and truly
participatory its likely to be. - Suggests that the elders of a city would share
the oversight of all the house-churches.
14NT Churches Meeting Places, Size
- Some met in homes. Rom. 163-5
- Also met in the temple. Acts 246 512
- Began with 3,000 and grew rapidly. Acts 241 44
- In Acts 15 the multitude was able to meet in one
place. 154, 12, 22 - School of Tyrannus. Acts 198-10
- Singular always used of flock and church in Acts
2017ff. - Third story at Troas held a significant group.
Acts 20
15NT Churches Meeting Places, Size
- Some met in homes. Rom. 163-5
- Also met in the temple. Acts 246 512
- School of Tyrannus. Acts 198-10
- Third story at Troas held a significant group.
Acts 20 - Corinth.
- Large enough to be in danger of dividing into
four factions. 1 Cor. 111-13 - Prophets, tongue speakers, interpreters, etc.
- Eat at home as opposed to where they met.
16NT Churches Meeting Places, Size
- Some met in homes. Rom. 163-5
- Also met in the temple. Acts 246 512
- School of Tyrannus. Acts 198-10
- Corinth.
- Large enough to be in danger of dividing into
four factions. 1 Cor. 111-13 - Prophets, tongue speakers, interpreters, etc.
- Eat at home as opposed to where they met.
- NT churches were not always small and didnt
always meet in private homes.
17Smith and Elders
- Criticizes churches for selecting elders based on
worldly success and calls most a corporate board
of directors and not shepherds. - Then advocates elders overseeing all the house
churches on a city-wide basis.
18Smiths Urban Church
One Eldership Overseeing Five Churches
19House-churches and Elders
- If we limit the size of the groups how often will
we have qualified elders? 1 Tim. 3 - Few churches will have elders.
- Worldly success should not be the standard.
- The Scriptures must be our guide. Titus 15-7
- But can a man not be successful in both the world
and in spiritual matters? - Elders are to be shepherds (Acts 2028), but they
are also overseers. 1 Pet. 51-4
20City-wide, Multi-church Elders Are Unscriptural
- How can you shepherd people you do not assemble
with? - The flock among them is the biblical pattern.
Acts 2028 1 Pet. 52, 3 - Elders in every city (Titus 15) is explained by
Acts 1423. - No NT church was said to be made up of several
smaller churches.
21Conclusion
- Smith has noble aims, but a misguided approach.
- The Lords Supper is about remembering Jesus, not
satisfying our hunger. - Modern fellowship meals are unscriptural.
- The place of meeting is not the issue, but making
churches small and informal is wrong. - Elders are to oversee the flock among them.
- Lets keep our minds renewed and our principles
Scriptural.
22Invitation
- We have talked about remembering Jesus, but have
you ever come to Jesus? - Why not now?
23(No Transcript)