NACBIB Strategic Plan Development Subcommittee January 14, 2004 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

NACBIB Strategic Plan Development Subcommittee January 14, 2004

Description:

Background NIH Roadmap. Re-engineering the Clinical Research Enterprise: ... Mix of grants depends upon strategy, 50/50 seems reasonable if ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: yin110
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NACBIB Strategic Plan Development Subcommittee January 14, 2004


1
NACBIBStrategic Plan Development
SubcommitteeJanuary 14, 2004
  • Frank Yin

2
Background NIH Roadmap
  • New Pathways to Discovery
  • Building blocks
  • Develop radical new technologies
  • Molecular libraries
  • Speed development of next generation
  • Improve detection sensitivity
  • Structural biology
  • Create a picture of
  • Find ways to deduce protein structure
  • Bioinformatics and comp. biology
  • Generate software and data development tools
  • Nanomedicine
  • Creation and use of materials and devices at
    molecular level
  • applications

3
Background NIH Roadmap
  • Research Teams of the Future
  • High risk research
  • Accelerate pace of discovery
  • Interdisciplinary research
  • Training in interdisciplinary strategies
  • New centers to forge new disciplines
  • Public-private partnerships
  • Forward-looking conferences

4
Background NIH Roadmap
  • Re-engineering the Clinical Research Enterprise
  • Adopt a systematic infrastructure
  • Increase interactions
  • New technologies for assessing clinical
    outcomes
  • Multidisciplinary research workforce

5
Background NIBIB Organization
  • Scientific Structure
  • Division of Discovery Science Technology
  • Division of Applied Science Technology
  • Division of Interdisciplinary Training
  • Administrative Structure
  • Program Coordination
  • Division of Science Administration
  • Division of Administrative Management
  • Division of Intramural Research

6
Interpretation
Buzzwords development, interdisciplinary
  • NIBIB is an ideal Institute to traverse the
    roadmap

with the proper vision and strategic plan !
7
Overarching Strategic Issues
  • Relative size viz. other institutes
  • Different mission
  • Not disease specific
  • Not necessarily hypothesis driven
  • Focus on technology

8
Specific Strategic Issues
  • Mix of hypothesis vs. technology driven grants
  • Funding teams vs. individuals
  • True co-investigators without subcontracts
  • Split of IDC
  • Funding distributed research
  • Training interdisciplinary teams vs. individuals
  • IGERT-like program ?

9
Scientific Goals and Priorities
  • Discovery Science and Technology
  • Dealing with complex systems
  • Nonlinear
  • Multiple redundancies
  • Multiple interactions
  • Adaptive
  • Smart (adaptive) biomaterials
  • Biocomputers

10
Scientific Goals and Priorities
  • Applied Science and Technology
  • New quantitative high-throughput methods
  • Handling massive amounts of data
  • New imaging modalities
  • True biosensors

11
Strategies For Allocating Limited Resources
  • Leverage unique aspects of NIBIB
  • Technology development focus
  • Leverage public-private funding
  • Foundations
  • Companies (less likely)
  • Cap on grant size ?
  • Term limits on grants ?
  • Collaborate with other Institutes - only if true
    partnership viz. relative size

12
Specific Issues
  • Process for developing strategic plan
  • Unique opportunity with new institute
  • Have to get the first one right !
  • Should involve broad constituent input -
    including (or especially) those under 40

13
Specific Issues
  • Target growth rate 5 or 10, certainly not 2
    !!
  • At 2 increment funding level likely to be at or
    near 10-15
  • Across the board uniform increase is not smart
    nor justified based on roadmap NIBIB will
    always be smallest
  • 2 not justified based on current demand
  • Future demand likely to be even higher
  • Technology development is expensive
  • Mix of grants depends upon strategy, 50/50
    seems reasonable if interdisciplinary issues
    resolved
  • Rationale for intramural program
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com