Title: journal club
1journal club
2a dilemma
- A healthy, non-smoking, 35 y/o female presented
w/ a proximal DVT. Her only RF was using OCPs.
Thrombophilia w/u is negative. She has completed
LMWH?coumadin (3mo) without complications. What
now? - A 62 y/o male presented with an idiopathic
proximal DVT and left PE treated with
LMWH?coumadin (6mo). His PMH includes CAD, DM,
HTN, and OA. Thrombophlia and malignancy workup
is unrevealing. He completes 6 months of
coumadin without complications. What now?
3we finished the treatment course!?!?
- Will they clot again?
- If they do, could it be fatal?
- What about just keeping them on coumadin?
- Whats the risk of recurrent VTE vs. significant
bleeding?
4objectives
- Review the risks of bleeding while on vitamin K
antagonists (VKAs) - Provide data on the risks of recurrent VTE, and
particularly, fatal PE after completion of
recommended durations of anticoagulation in pts
with VTE and the absence of non-modifiable RFs
(malignancy, high-risk thrombophilia, permanent
immobility) - Compare mortality rates of recurrent VTE and
continued VKA use
52004 Chest Guidelines - DVTs
- For patients with a first episode of DVT
secondary to a transient (reversible) risk
factor, we recommend long-term treatment with a
VKA for 3 months over treatment for shorter
periods (Grade 1A).1 - For patients with a first episode of idiopathic
DVT, we recommend treatment with a VKA for at
least 6 to 12 months (Grade 1A). 1
6DVTs cont.
- We suggest that patients with first-episode
idiopathic DVT be considered for indefinite
anticoagulant therapy (Grade 2A).1 - In patients who receive indefinite anticoagulant
treatment, the risk-benefit of continuing such
treatment should be reassessed in the individual
patient at periodic intervals (Grade 1C).1
7what about PEs?
- Given the dearth of studies in patients with PE
alone, many of the recommendations about
long-term treatment of patients with PE are
derived from clinical trials of patients who
largely had DVT and as a result, the
recommendations about the long-term treatment are
the same as for DVT.1
8What happens after stopping coumadin?
9so, in one slide or less, how risky is coumadin?
- Lets suppose, a pt w/ a consistently controlled
INR (2-3) has a 1-3 risk per year of bleeding.
a good guess5 - Case fatality of major bleeding is estimated at
96 - Therefore, annual risk of death is the product of
bleeding risk and case fatality (0.18). (NNH
555)
10shall we compare to recurrent VTE?
- The Risk for Fatal Pulmonary Embolism after
Discontinuing Anticoagulant Therapy for Venous
Thromboembolism by Douketis et al. - An inception cohort following gt2000 patients as
they stopped VKAs after appropriate duration who
initially had VTE. The outcomes were recurrent
VTE
11how it worked . . .
where
DVT PE DVT PE
outcomes Nonfatal DVT Recurrent nonfatal
PE Definate/probable fatal PE Possible fatal PE
2054 Pts w/ VTE stop VKAs at end of treatment
course
Monitored
etiology
Idiopathic Secondary
secondary associated w/ surgery, leg trauma/fx,
childbirth, bedridden gt1mo 2/2 medical illness,
pregnancy, hormonal therapy, rheumatologic illness
12details
- Design induction cohort comprised of patients
from a cohort (1628)2 and RCT (424)3 - Who were they? Consecutive pts w/ DVT, PE, or
both for the first time. Excluded if had a
condition requiring lifelong anticoagulation
(malignancy, permanent immobility, high-risk
thrombophilia). Included when they had
discontinued gt 3 months of therapy
13details
- The included cohort study of VTE and gt3 mo Tx
- The included RCT comparison on 6wks and 6mos of
Tx, using only the 6mo group - Outcomes
- Nonfatal DVT (U/s or venography)
- Recurrent nonfatal PE (by V/Q or CTA)
- Definite/probable fatal PE
- Possible fatal PE (sudden death of undetermined
cause)
14definite/probable/possible
- Dx of fatal PE problematic
- Clinician bias/diagnostic suspicion in sudden
death if a hx/o VTE - Attributing all sudden deaths in pts with
previous VTE would overestimate the risk - Definite fatal PE confirmed at autopsy
- Probable death preceded immediately nonfatal
PE/DVT - Possible sudden death that couldnt be explained
by anything other than PE - Definite/Probable linked together in study to
more conservative risk estimate. Possible then
included to provide the range of risk
15follow-up
- Cohort q6mo w/ phone or clinic visit for a
maximum of 120 months - RCT clinic visits at 3 and 6 mo in first year
and then every 12 mo for maximum of 120 months
16pg 769
17how likely is fatal PE?
- Average f/u 52 months
- 501/2052 pts had a clinical outcome
- 340 DVTs
- 116 nonfatal PE
- 27 possible fatal PE
- 18 definate/probable fatal PE
- 42 lost to followup/resumed ACT for reasons other
than VTE
pg 770
18if VTE occurs, what are fatal?
Case fatality fatal event / total number of
events
pg 770
19examining across time
pg 771
20across time cont
pg 772
21any clues as to who will die?
pg 772
22applicability
- Do/will I see patients like this? Yes
- Does this information potentially change my
decision making process? Yes - Are the results valid?
- Long term follow-up
- Clinically relevant outcomes
- Biases/confounders?
- Where could I use more information
- Risk w/ comorbidities (DM, CVD, COPD, etc)
- By design, we did not define optimal duration of
VKA, but what happened after . . . - We didnt define number needed to help patients
with VTE, but number needed to harm those who
stop using anticoagulation
23but what do I apply?
- Were now informed of the risks associated in
discontinuation of VKAs in specific VTE
populations - We can compare risk of this group with the risk
of continuing VKAs for longer
24in stopping Tx for VTE, what is the NNH?
- Recurrence risk of VTE per year is 105
- Case-fatality 4-9 in recurrent VTE
- Therefore product of recurrence risk and
case-fatality gives likelihood of a fatal event
per year (0.4-0.9) - NNH 111-250
- Reminder, NNH for continued coumadin 555!!
25so . . . .
- Both continuing and stopping VKAs have real but
small risks of death - While the risk might be higher with
discontinuation, other factors must be considered - In the end, this helps us to better inform
patients in the decision making process - Idiopathic VTE presenting as a PE in an older
adult is likely the most concerning demographic
26A dilemma no more?
- A healthy, non-smoking, 35 y/o female presented
w/ a proximal DVT. Her only RF was using OCPs.
Thrombophilia w/u is negative. She has completed
LMWH?coumadin (3mo) without complications. What
now? - A 62 y/o male presented with an idiopathic
proximal DVT and left PE treated with
LMWH?coumadin (6mo). His PMH includes CAD, DM,
HTN, and OA. Thrombophlia and malignancy workup
is unrevealing. He completes 6 months of
coumadin without complications. What now?
27references
- Buller et al. Antithrombotic Therapy for Venous
Thromboembolic Disease. Chest 2004 126401S-428S - Prandoni, P. The Risk of Recurrent Venous
Thromboembolism After Discontinuing
Anticoagulation in Patients with Acute Proximal
Deep Venous Thrombosis or Pulmonary Embolism.
Hematologica. 2007 92199-205 - Schulman, S. A Comparison of Six Weeks with Six
Months of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy After a
First Episode of Venous Thromboembolism. NEJM.
1995 3321661-1665. - Levine MN, et al. Hemorrhagic Complications of
Anticoagulant Treatment. Chest 2004
126287S-310S - Linkins, LA. Clinical Impact of Bleeding in
Patients Taking Oral Anticoagulant Therapy for
Venous Thromboembolism. Ann Intern Med.
2003139893-900 - Douketis, JD. Comparison of Bleeding in Patients
With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Treated With
Ximelagatran or Warfarin. Arch Intern Med.
2006166853-859 - Douketis, JD. The Risk for Fatal Pulmonary
Embolism after Discontinuing Anticoagulant
Therapy for Venous Thromboembolism. Ann Intern
Med. 2007147766-774.