Title: OFTEL
1OFTELs Approach to Tariff Packages for Accessing
the Internet
- Penny Hierons
- Economic Adviser
2Introduction
- What concerns are there about tariffs for
accessing the Internet? - What can OFTEL do to meet these concerns?
- Can it all be left to OFTEL?
- Frequently raised issues
3Concerns about current tariffs
- Usage prices are above costs for calls to the
Internet - Existing tariff structures do not meet the needs
of Internet users
4What can OFTEL do in relation to NTS tariffs?
- OFTEL has existing proposals for more pricing
flexibility - Other proposals include
- two-part charging
- discounts for large users
- adjusting the retail uplift for volume growth
5Tariff structures
- Main focus of attention has been the lack of an
unmetered tariff - Have been recent offerings in this area, such as
Callnet - However, such tariffs are not widely available
6What can OFTEL do to encourage new tariff
structures?
- Independently, not very much
- In this area, OFTELs role is mainly the
resolution of disputes - If no dispute exists, there is no rationale for
OFTEL to impose new tariff structures
7Can it all be left to OFTEL?
- Operators are free to set new retail tariff
structures - If the structure of interconnection is an issue,
it is up to operators to negotiate with BT - In the event of a dispute, OFTEL can determine
the charge
8General Issues
- Marginal or average cost
- Size of marginal costs
- Prices at different times of day
9Marginal or average cost pricing?
- Has been a call for prices to be set at marginal
cost - In general, efficiency is maximised by setting
price equals marginal cost - But BT could not recover total costs, so need a
mark-up - Could be an argument for a lower mark-up on
Internet calls, but evidence is weak
10Size of marginal costs
- Has been asserted that marginal cost of
additional usage is close to, or equal to, zero - Additional traffic creates a demand for
additional circuits, ports and switching capacity - Marginal cost of long distance conveyance can be
estimated as around 0.3-0.4ppm
11Prices at different times of day (1)
- Argument is that off-peak usage is costless
- While incremental cost is zero, this does not
imply that a zero price is appropriate - This is because off-peak periods could have the
potential to become peak periods - Peak load pricing is usually proposed to deal
with this
12Prices at different times of day (2)
- Argument is that peak usage is too expensive
relative to off-peak usage - No generally accepted answer to how prices should
vary between different times of day and week - Prices varied by time of day to flatten the
traffic load curve. - BTs load curve suggests the current differences
are reasonable
13Conclusion
- OFTELs aim is to provide tariff flexibility for
operators and service providers - OFTEL can help by bringing NTS prices more into
line with costs - Industry needs to play its part in terms of
interconnect pricing - OFTEL hopes that progress on all these fronts can
be made quickly