What does neglect look like - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

What does neglect look like

Description:

Auditory. Visual spatial. Reading. Subtypes. Useful field of view. Subtypes. Extinction ... Sensation use attention to compensate ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:61
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: afu4
Category:
Tags: look | neglect

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: What does neglect look like


1
What does neglect look like?
  • Allan Funk
  • Occupational Therapist
  • Foothills Medical Centre

2
glect look like?
  • Funk
  • al Therapist
  • dical Centre

3
What does neglect look like?
  • Allan Funk
  • Occupational Therapist
  • Foothills Medical Centre

4
at es lect ok ke?
  • an nk
  • tional apist
  • hills ical tre

5
Not so neglected
  • Hot topic
  • Implications for safety, independence are varied
    and serious
  • Many subtypes
  • Limited understanding many limitations in
    assessment and treatment

6
Impact
  • Mobility
  • Driving
  • ADL
  • IADL

7
Neglect
  • How does it work?
  • How does it break down?

8
  • What process or mechanism is breaking down?
  • Registration, integration, selection, action
  • Sensation, perception, cognition, praxis

9
Sensation
  • Peripheral or central
  • Attention

10
Integration
  • Coordinate systems eye-centered, head-centered,
    body-centered, gravitational
  • Perceptual fields relative leftness,
    environment vs. object
  • Peri-personal vs. extra-personal
  • Construction

11
Selection
  • Attention
  • Stimuli number, structure, contrast, salience,
    novelty, speed
  • Recognition
  • Vigilance Useful field of view
  • Central executive

12
Action
  • Visual or manual search
  • Mobility
  • Writing

13
Subtypes
  • Right vs. left
  • Incidence

14
Subtypes
  • Sensory- perceptual mode
  • Kinaesthetic
  • Auditory
  • Visual spatial
  • Reading

15
Subtypes
  • Useful field of view

16
Subtypes
  • Extinction

17
Fellow travellers
  • Awareness - anosognosia
  • Indifference - anosodiaphoria
  • Sensory loss
  • Attention
  • Memory
  • Motor impairment

18
Anatomy
  • inferior parietal, frontal lobe, cingulate
    cortex, superior colliculus, lateral hypothalamus
  • anterior (lesion limited to the prefrontal cortex
    and adjacent white matter) posterior (lesion
    limited to the retrorolandic cortex, including
    parietal, but also temporal and/or occipital
    regions) anteroposterior (lesion involving both
    prefrontal, rolandic, and posterior regions,)
    subcortical (lesion limited to subcortical areas,
    such as internal capsule, centrum semiovale,
    striatum, or thalamus)
  • Occipital lobe, anterior limb of the internal
    capsule, posterior limb of the internal capsule,
    anterior portion of paraventricular white matter,
    posterior portion of paraventricular white
    matter, thalamus

19
Anatomy II
  • Top-down
  • Bottom-up
  • Posterior parietal cortex, frontal eye fields,
    cingulate gyrus
  • Thalamus, striatum, superior colliculus,
    ascending reticular activating system

20
Assessment
  • Pencil and paper or computer-based tasks
  • Scoring
  • Sensitivity

21
Assessment
  • Cancellation
  • Bisection
  • Visual scanning
  • Construction
  • Reading

22
Assessment
  • Cancellation visual search pattern is most
    predictive
  • Right start gtdistribution of errorsgtnumber of
    errors
  • Bisection placement and length

23
Assessment
  • Preponderance of pencil paper
  • There is not yet a reliable, sensitive formal
    test of extra-personal neglect.

24
Function
  • Much better sensitivity than pencil and paper
  • Complexity of enivronment is key
  • interpretation requires knowledge of subtypes

25
Treatment
  • Focus on where the process is breaking down

26
Treatment
  • Sensation use attention to compensate
  • Use soundbites or acronyms to facilitate
    acquisition of compensatory strategy
  • Minimum cueing fading ensure the patient is
    as active as possible in generating the desired
    behaviour
  • Target key functional tasks where safety is a
    particular concern here you may need to cue
    more heavily

27
Treatment
  • Integration poorly understood.
  • Eliminate distractions, try to use the simplest
    successful tasks/materials/environments.

28
Treatment
  • Selection/Attention treatment may not
    generalise from one sensory-perceptual mode to
    another
  • Amenable to remediation
  • Delineate relevant subtypes
  • Manipulate key stimulus variables to grade and
    progress tasks number, novelty, structure,
    salience, speed, contrast

29
Treatment
  • Action
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com