Extending the Organization - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Extending the Organization

Description:

'Companies need not trade off flexibility for integration in critical cross ... Amazon.com. Control inventory, set prices. Revenue = sales of products/services ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: HBSU5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Extending the Organization


1
Lecture 5
  • Extending the Organization
  • (Chapter 3)

2
Communication (r)evolution
  • Open communication between firms is new!
  • Compare with advent of telephone
  • This chapter extends chapter 2 discussion to
    include how decisions are made in a networked
    organization

3
Business networks
  • Companies need not trade off flexibility for
    integration in critical cross-company processes.
    By managing the activities of and relationships
    with suppliers as networks rather than production
    lines, companies can swap their tightly coupled
    processes for loosely coupled ones, thereby
    gaining much needed flexibility and improving
    their performance in the bargain
  • (page 80)

4
Some key ideas
  • Differentiation how organizations are subdivided
    into specialized work units (nodes)
  • Horizontal (operating units)
  • Vertical (power/authority levels)
  • Integration relationships and links between nodes
    required to unite specialized units and enable
    shared value
  • Task-based (groups work together on processes)
  • Information/expertise based (groups provide
    information or expertise)
  • Social relationships (affliation and identity
    separate from work)

5
Table 3.1 Options for designing differentiated
unit groupings
6
Sociology of relationships
  • Stronger relationships needed in presence of
  • Increased complexity, uncertainty
  • Task interdependence eg. Shared services
  • Innovation
  • Large real-time information sharing
  • Diverse subcultures
  • Leader preferences

7
Framing decisions of differentiation
  • What capabilities and resources are required to
    achieve goals?
  • What activities must be performed to get there?
  • How should these activities be grouped within
    specialized units?
  • See table 3.1

8
Framing Decisions of Interdependence
  • What key tasks must be managed between
    specialized groups?
  • What organizational solutions are needed to
    coordinate and control interdependence?
  • What configuration of organizational solutions
    should be used to ensure alignment and fit with
    the business environment and strategy?
  • See table 3.2

9
Network Ownership
  • Corporation legally defined organization
  • Alliance between a small number of players
  • Community/Ecosystem players working together to
    achieve shared goals
  • See figure 3.1

10
Figure 3.1 Emerging IT-Enabled Extended
Enterprise Models
11
Figure A3.1 Classifying Network Business Models
12
Appendix Revenue, Cost, Asset models
13
Hybrid Governance
  • Is market or hierarchy better?
  • Transaction cost theory says markets give greater
    efficiency and effectiveness unless cost and risk
    of using market mechanisms to coordinate and
    control interdependencies are higher than the
    cost and risk of hierarchy
  • Cost and risk increases with
  • Duplication of costly assets that cannot be
    shared
  • Setting frequent disputes
  • Cost related to information access
  • Need to join others to increase market power
  • Hierarchy used when high risk of market failure
  • Executives given authority to determine shared
    purpose and goals
  • Unified leadership gives focus
  • Hierarchy optimizes vertical information
    processing
  • Markets optimize horizontal information processing

14
IT enables governance models
  • Information sharing, processing, creating
  • Shared purpose of multiple firms
  • Enable configurations and solutions between firms
    but do not preclude market-based transactions as
    well
  • Shared projects/values encourages increased
    activity over time

15
Table 3.2 Options for designing inter-firm
governance
16
Internet Business Classes
  • Producers
  • Package work of creators into products, services
    and solutions to meet market need
  • Distributors
  • Enable buyers and sellers to connect, communicate
    and transact business
  • Portals
  • Aggregate products, services and/or information
    for use by members of community

17
Focused Distributors
  • Provide products/services for specific industry
  • Differentiating business models
  • Does business assume control of inventory?
  • Does business sell online?
  • Is price set outside the market or is online
    price negotiation and bidding permitted?
  • Is there a physical product or service that must
    be distributed?

18
Focused Distributers
  • eRetailers
  • Amazon.com
  • Control inventory, set prices
  • Revenue sales of products/services
  • Cost precurement, inventory management, order
    fulfillment, customer service
  • Started as bookstore
  • In 2000, changed business model to eLogistics

19
Focused Distributors
  • eMarkets
  • Global Healthcare exchange
  • Links buyers and sellers
  • Take cut from transactions no direct control of
    physical inventory
  • Often also provide system integration and custom
    software development

20
Focused Distributors
  • eAggregators
  • insWeb
  • Provide information on products or services for
    sale by another channel
  • Catalogs, comparisons, reviews
  • Dont complete final sale transaction
  • Pass customer to supplier obtaining referral
    fee and advertising revenue

21
Focused Distributors
  • Infomediaries
  • Internet securities
  • Unites sellers and buyers of information
  • No physical product
  • Often subscription fees, advertising fees
  • Barriers to entry are low (information is freely
    available)
  • Companies evolve to allow transactions

22
Focused Distributors
  • Exchanges
  • NASDAQ, eBay
  • Sometimes control inventory
  • Price is negotiated by buyer and seller
  • Various fee structures used

23
Portals
  • AOL
  • Provide access to internet and tools
  • Subscription fee

24
Producers
  • Business models have evolved
  • Manufacturers use internet to design, produce,
    distribute products
  • Service providers deliver widerange of online
    services
  • Educators
  • Advisors
  • News services

25
Digital Infrastructure Providers
  • Hardware
  • Software
  • Components

26
Infrastructure Portals
  • Combine access to range of hosting services
  • Horizontal Portals
  • ISPs, gateway access
  • Access and maintenance fees, subscription,
    advertising, transaction fees
  • Vertical Portals
  • Application service providers (ASPs)
  • IBM business outsourcing

27
Summary tables from appendix
28
Example NASDAQ
  • Collaborative community started in 1971
  • National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD)
  • Enabled network of members to trade securities on
    behalf of individual and institutional investors
  • 22.5 billion shares of stock listed (2005)
  • Operates over network rather than physical
    trading floor
  • Multiple members see fig 3.2

29
Figure 3.2 NASDAQ Extended Enterprise
30
Foundation of NASDAQ
  • Automation of end-to-end securities trading,
    clearance and settlement process
  • Streamlined activities lead to efficiency,
    consistency and reliability
  • Members make decisions to control processes
  • Broker-dealers become network orchestrators,
    bringing buyers and sellers together
  • Creates an extended enterprise of on demand
    business

31
Role of IT in NASDAQ
  • Standards and rules are embedded automatically
  • Information created as byproduct of automated
    systems
  • Enables reporting
  • Enables monitoring
  • Transparency leads to trust

32
Partnerships and Trust
  • Process-based trust
  • Parties manage interdependencies over recurrent
    transactions
  • Affiliation-based trust
  • Identity between groups/within group
  • Institution-based trust
  • Tied to formal organizational and social
    structures

33
Global Healthcare Exchange
  • Founded in 2000 by big names in healthcare
    JohnsonJohnson, GE Medical Systems, Baxter
    Healthcare, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic
  • Designed to provide a worldwide online, open and
    independent electronic trading exchange to
    facilitate the real-time transfer of information,
    money , goods, and or services in the worldwide
    medical equipment, products and services
    industry
  • Drive down costs in supply chain
  • Internet-based company using experienced players
  • Several strategic acquisitions, alliances and
    mergers

34
History and Evolution
35
GHX vision
  • Avoid middle-man between suppliers and
    providers
  • Control fees
  • Standardize data in industry
  • Improve efficiency of supply chain for all
    players
  • Challenges
  • Competing companies had to work together
  • Who had how much control?
  • Creative LLC agreement

36
GHX Strategy
  • Borrow employees from founding companies
  • Outsource supply-chain software development
  • Mergers and acquisitions such as HealthNexis
  • Led to acceptance in market
  • Strategic Mergers such as Medibuy
  • Evolving product offerings
  • Blend of technology, service, logistics
  • Startup built by established firms
  • Small company with large network of partners

37
Key Insights from examples
  • Hybrid forms of government are emerging that
    unite hierarchy, market and partnership
  • A network orchestrator role is emerging to
    coordinate inter-firm interdependencies within
    business ecosystems, like NASDAQ and GHX
  • Network orchestrators design organizational
    solutions that reflect the interests of all
    parties
  • Collaborative community and trust co-evolve over
    time

38
Project Teams and Topics
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com