Title: Incremental Analysis
1Chapter20
Incremental Analysis
2The Challenge ofChanging Markets
- Product markets can change quickly due to
competitor pricecuts, changing customer
preferences, and introduction ofnew products by
competitors. - Managers must make short-run decisions, with a
fixed setof resources, to react to the changing
market place.
3The Concept ofRelevant Cost Information
- Will you drive or fly to Florida for spring
break? - You have gathered the following information to
help you with the decision. - Motel cost is 80 per night.
- Meal cost is 20 per day.
- Your car insurance is 100 per month.
- Kennel cost for your dog is 5 per day.
- Round-trip cost of gasoline for your car is 200.
- Round-trip airfare and rental car for a week is
500. - Driving requires two days, with an overnight
stay, cutting your time in Florida by two days.
4The Concept ofRelevant Cost Information
8 days _at_ 80
8 days _at_ 20
8 days _at_ 5
5The Concept ofRelevant Cost Information
Costs do not differ,so they are notrelevant to
decision.
Also, car insuranceis not relevant tothe
decision as itis a past cost.
6The Concept ofRelevant Cost Information
Are the extra twodays in Floridaworth the
300extra cost to fly?
Transportationcosts differ betweenthe two
alternatives,so they are relevantto your
decision
7Decision Making
- Decision making involves five steps
- Define the problem.
- Identify the alternatives.
- Collect information on alternatives.
- Eliminate irrelevant information.
- Make a decision with the remaining relevant
information.
8Relevant Informationin Business Decisions
- Information that varies among the possible
courses of action being considered. - Incremental costs and revenues
- Important cost concepts forbusiness decisions.
- Opportunity costs.
- Sunk costs.
- Out-of-pocket costs.
9Opportunity Cost
- The benefit that could have been attained by
pursuing an alternative course of action. - Example If you were notattending college, you
couldbe earning 20,000 per year. Your
opportunity cost ofattending college for
oneyear includes the 20,000. - Opportunity costs are not recorded in the
accounting records, but are relevant to decisions
because they are a real sacrifice.
10Sunk Costs VersusOut-of-Pocket Costs
- All costs incurred in the past that cannot be
changed by any decision made now or in the
future. - Sunk costs should not be considered in
decisions. - Example You bought an automobile that cost
10,000 two years ago. The 10,000 cost is sunk
because whether you drive it, park it, trade it,
or sell it, you cannot change the 10,000 cost.
11Sunk Costs VersusOut-of-Pocket Costs
Trade ?
Cost 10,000two years ago
Cost 25,000today
The dealer will trade for 20,000 plus your
car.What amount is relevant to your decision,
the 10,000 sunk cost of your car or the20,000
out-of-pocket cash differential?
12Incremental Analysis inCommon Business Decisions
We will now examine several different types of
managerial decisions.
13Special Order Decisions
- The decision to accept additional business
should be based on incremental costs and
incremental revenues. - Incremental amounts are those that occur only
if the company decides to accept the new business.
14Special Order Decisions
- JamCo currently sells 100,000 units of its
product. The company has revenue and costs as
shown below
15Special Order Decisions
- JamCo is approached by an overseascompany
that offers to purchase10,000 units at 8.50 per
unit. - If JamCo accepts the offer, total factory
overhead will increase by 5,000 total selling
expenses will increase by 2,000 and total
administrative expenses will increaseby 1,000. - Should JamCoaccept the offer?
16Special Order Decisions
First lets look at incorrect reasoningthat
leads to an incorrect decision.
Our cost is 9.00per unit. I cant sell for
8.50 per unit.
17Special Order Decisions
This analysis leads to the correct decision.
18Special Order Decisions
19Special Order Decisions
20Special Order Decisions
21Special Order Decisions
22Special Order Decisions
- We can also look at this decisionusing
contribution margin.
23Production Constraint Decisions
Managers often face the problem of deciding how
scarce resources are going to be utilized.
Usually, fixed costs are not affected by this
particular decision, so management can focus on
maximizing total contribution margin. Lets
look at the Kaser Company example.
24Production Constraint Decisions
- Kaser Company produces two products and selected
data is shown below
25Production Constraint Decisions
- Machine A1 is the scarce resource because
there is excess capacity on other machines.
Machine A1 is being used at 100 of its capacity. - Machine A1 capacity is 2,400 minutes per week.
- Should Kaser focus its efforts on Product 1 or 2?
26Production Constraint Decisions
- Lets calculate the contribution margin per unit
of the scarce resource, machine A1.
27Production Constraint Decisions
Lets calculate the contribution margin per unit
of the scarce resource, machine A1.
Product 2 should be emphasized. It is the more
valuable use of the scarce resource, machine A1,
yielding a contribution margin of 30 per minute
as opposed to 24 for Product 1.
28Production Constraint Decisions
Lets calculate the contribution margin per unit
of the scarce resource, machine A1.
If there are no other considerations, the best
plan would be to produce to meet current demand
for Product 2 and then use any capacity that
remains to make Product 1.
29Production Constraint Decisions
- Lets see how this plan would work.
30Production Constraint Decisions
Lets see how this plan would work.
31Production Constraint Decisions
Lets see how this plan would work.
32Production Constraint Decisions
- According to the plan, we will produce 2,200
units of Product 2 and 1,300 of Product 1. Our
contribution margin looks like this.
The total contribution margin for Kaser is
64,200.
33Make or Buy Decisions
34Make or Buy Decisions
- Incremental costs also are important in the
decision to make a product or buy it from a
supplier. - The cost to produce an item must include(1)
direct materials, (2) direct labor and (3)
incremental overhead. - We should not use the predetermined overhead rate
to determine product cost.
35Make or Buy Decisions
- Exitel makes computer chips used inone of its
products. Unit costs, based on production of
20,000 chips per year, are
36Make or Buy Decisions
- An outside supplier has offered to provide the
20,000 chips at a cost of 25 per chip. Fixed
overhead costs will not be avoided if the chips
are purchased. Exitel has no alternative use for
the facilities. - Should Exitel accept the offer?
37Make or Buy Decisions
Differential costs of making (costs avoided if
bought from outside supplier)
Exitel should not pay 25 per unit to an outside
supplier to avoid the 15 per unit differential
cost of making the part. Fixed costs are
irrelevant to decision.
38Make or Buy Decisions
- If Exitel buys the chips from the outside
supplier, the idle facilities could be leased to
another company for 250,000 per year. - Should Exitel buy the chips andlease the
facilities?
39Make or Buy Decisions
The opportunity cost of facilities changes the
decision.
The real question to answer is, What is the
best use of Exitels facilities?
40Sell, Scrap, or Rebuild Decisions
- Costs incurred in manufacturing units of
product that do not meet quality standards are
sunk costs and cannot be recovered. - As long as rebuild costs are recovered through
sale of the product, and rebuilding does not
interfere with normal production, we should
rebuild.
41Sell, Scrap, or Rebuild Decisions
- OserCo has 10,000 defective units thatcost
1.00 each to make. The units can be scrapped
now for .40 each or rebuilt at an additional
cost of .80 per unit. - If rebuilt, the units can be sold for the normal
selling price of 1.50 each. Rebuilding the
10,000 defective units will prevent the
production of 10,000 new units that would also
sell for 1.50. - Should OserCo scrap or rebuild?
42Sell, Scrap, or Rebuild Decisions
10,000 units 0.40 per unit
10,000 units 1.50 per unit
43Sell, Scrap, or Rebuild Decisions
10,000 units 0.80 per unit
10,000 units (1.50 - 1.00) per unit
44Sell, Scrap, or Rebuild Decisions
OserCo should scrap the units now.
If OserCo fails to include the opportunity
cost,the rework option would show a return of
7,000,mistakenly making rebuild appear more
favorable.
45Joint Product Decisions
Two or more products produced from acommon input
are called joint products.
Product 1
Joint costs arethe costs ofprocessing prior to
the split-off point.
Joint Costs
Product 2
Product 3
The split-off point is the point in a process
where joint products can be recognized as
separate products.
46Joint Product Decisions
- Businesses are often faced with the decision
to sell partially completed products at the
split-off point or to process them to completion. - General rule process further only if
incremental revenues gt incremental costs.
47Joint Product Decisions
Ames Co. produces two products, A and B, from
this process.
Should the products besold at split-off
orprocessed further?
48Joint Product Decisions
Product A incremental revenue 120,000 -
70,000 Product B incremental revenue
65,000 - 50,000
Decision Process product A, but sell product B
at the split-off point. Note that the 100,000
joint cost is irrelevant to the processing
decision.
49Joint Product Decisions
Joint costs are really common costs incurred to
simultaneously produce a variety of end products.
Joint costs are commonly allocated to end
products on the basis of the relative sales value
of each product or on some other basis.
50Joint Product Decisions
- Joint costs are not relevantin decisions
regarding what to do witha product after the
split-off point. - As a general rule . . .
- It is always profitable to continue processing a
joint product after the split-off point so long
as the incremental revenue exceeds the
incremental processing costs.
51End of Chapter 20
Hey dude,its party time!