Incremental Analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Incremental Analysis

Description:

... cost is $20 per day. Your car insurance is $100 ... If there are no other considerations, the best plan would be to produce to meet ... Make or Buy Decisions ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:179
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 52
Provided by: charle497
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Incremental Analysis


1
Chapter20
Incremental Analysis
2
The Challenge ofChanging Markets
  • Product markets can change quickly due to
    competitor pricecuts, changing customer
    preferences, and introduction ofnew products by
    competitors.
  • Managers must make short-run decisions, with a
    fixed setof resources, to react to the changing
    market place.

3
The Concept ofRelevant Cost Information
  • Will you drive or fly to Florida for spring
    break?
  • You have gathered the following information to
    help you with the decision.
  • Motel cost is 80 per night.
  • Meal cost is 20 per day.
  • Your car insurance is 100 per month.
  • Kennel cost for your dog is 5 per day.
  • Round-trip cost of gasoline for your car is 200.
  • Round-trip airfare and rental car for a week is
    500.
  • Driving requires two days, with an overnight
    stay, cutting your time in Florida by two days.

4
The Concept ofRelevant Cost Information
8 days _at_ 80
8 days _at_ 20
8 days _at_ 5
5
The Concept ofRelevant Cost Information
Costs do not differ,so they are notrelevant to
decision.
Also, car insuranceis not relevant tothe
decision as itis a past cost.
6
The Concept ofRelevant Cost Information
Are the extra twodays in Floridaworth the
300extra cost to fly?
Transportationcosts differ betweenthe two
alternatives,so they are relevantto your
decision
7
Decision Making
  • Decision making involves five steps
  • Define the problem.
  • Identify the alternatives.
  • Collect information on alternatives.
  • Eliminate irrelevant information.
  • Make a decision with the remaining relevant
    information.

8
Relevant Informationin Business Decisions
  • Information that varies among the possible
    courses of action being considered.
  • Incremental costs and revenues
  • Important cost concepts forbusiness decisions.
  • Opportunity costs.
  • Sunk costs.
  • Out-of-pocket costs.

9
Opportunity Cost
  • The benefit that could have been attained by
    pursuing an alternative course of action.
  • Example If you were notattending college, you
    couldbe earning 20,000 per year. Your
    opportunity cost ofattending college for
    oneyear includes the 20,000.
  • Opportunity costs are not recorded in the
    accounting records, but are relevant to decisions
    because they are a real sacrifice.

10
Sunk Costs VersusOut-of-Pocket Costs
  • All costs incurred in the past that cannot be
    changed by any decision made now or in the
    future.
  • Sunk costs should not be considered in
    decisions.
  • Example You bought an automobile that cost
    10,000 two years ago. The 10,000 cost is sunk
    because whether you drive it, park it, trade it,
    or sell it, you cannot change the 10,000 cost.

11
Sunk Costs VersusOut-of-Pocket Costs
Trade ?
Cost 10,000two years ago
Cost 25,000today
The dealer will trade for 20,000 plus your
car.What amount is relevant to your decision,
the 10,000 sunk cost of your car or the20,000
out-of-pocket cash differential?
12
Incremental Analysis inCommon Business Decisions
We will now examine several different types of
managerial decisions.
13
Special Order Decisions
  • The decision to accept additional business
    should be based on incremental costs and
    incremental revenues.
  • Incremental amounts are those that occur only
    if the company decides to accept the new business.

14
Special Order Decisions
  • JamCo currently sells 100,000 units of its
    product. The company has revenue and costs as
    shown below

15
Special Order Decisions
  • JamCo is approached by an overseascompany
    that offers to purchase10,000 units at 8.50 per
    unit.
  • If JamCo accepts the offer, total factory
    overhead will increase by 5,000 total selling
    expenses will increase by 2,000 and total
    administrative expenses will increaseby 1,000.
  • Should JamCoaccept the offer?

16
Special Order Decisions
First lets look at incorrect reasoningthat
leads to an incorrect decision.
Our cost is 9.00per unit. I cant sell for
8.50 per unit.
17
Special Order Decisions
This analysis leads to the correct decision.
18
Special Order Decisions
19
Special Order Decisions
20
Special Order Decisions
21
Special Order Decisions
22
Special Order Decisions
  • We can also look at this decisionusing
    contribution margin.

23
Production Constraint Decisions
Managers often face the problem of deciding how
scarce resources are going to be utilized.
Usually, fixed costs are not affected by this
particular decision, so management can focus on
maximizing total contribution margin. Lets
look at the Kaser Company example.
24
Production Constraint Decisions
  • Kaser Company produces two products and selected
    data is shown below

25
Production Constraint Decisions
  • Machine A1 is the scarce resource because
    there is excess capacity on other machines.
    Machine A1 is being used at 100 of its capacity.
  • Machine A1 capacity is 2,400 minutes per week.
  • Should Kaser focus its efforts on Product 1 or 2?

26
Production Constraint Decisions
  • Lets calculate the contribution margin per unit
    of the scarce resource, machine A1.

27
Production Constraint Decisions
Lets calculate the contribution margin per unit
of the scarce resource, machine A1.
Product 2 should be emphasized. It is the more
valuable use of the scarce resource, machine A1,
yielding a contribution margin of 30 per minute
as opposed to 24 for Product 1.
28
Production Constraint Decisions
Lets calculate the contribution margin per unit
of the scarce resource, machine A1.
If there are no other considerations, the best
plan would be to produce to meet current demand
for Product 2 and then use any capacity that
remains to make Product 1.
29
Production Constraint Decisions
  • Lets see how this plan would work.

30
Production Constraint Decisions
Lets see how this plan would work.
31
Production Constraint Decisions
Lets see how this plan would work.
32
Production Constraint Decisions
  • According to the plan, we will produce 2,200
    units of Product 2 and 1,300 of Product 1. Our
    contribution margin looks like this.

The total contribution margin for Kaser is
64,200.
33
Make or Buy Decisions
34
Make or Buy Decisions
  • Incremental costs also are important in the
    decision to make a product or buy it from a
    supplier.
  • The cost to produce an item must include(1)
    direct materials, (2) direct labor and (3)
    incremental overhead.
  • We should not use the predetermined overhead rate
    to determine product cost.

35
Make or Buy Decisions
  • Exitel makes computer chips used inone of its
    products. Unit costs, based on production of
    20,000 chips per year, are

36
Make or Buy Decisions
  • An outside supplier has offered to provide the
    20,000 chips at a cost of 25 per chip. Fixed
    overhead costs will not be avoided if the chips
    are purchased. Exitel has no alternative use for
    the facilities.
  • Should Exitel accept the offer?

37
Make or Buy Decisions
Differential costs of making (costs avoided if
bought from outside supplier)
Exitel should not pay 25 per unit to an outside
supplier to avoid the 15 per unit differential
cost of making the part. Fixed costs are
irrelevant to decision.
38
Make or Buy Decisions
  • If Exitel buys the chips from the outside
    supplier, the idle facilities could be leased to
    another company for 250,000 per year.
  • Should Exitel buy the chips andlease the
    facilities?

39
Make or Buy Decisions
The opportunity cost of facilities changes the
decision.
The real question to answer is, What is the
best use of Exitels facilities?
40
Sell, Scrap, or Rebuild Decisions
  • Costs incurred in manufacturing units of
    product that do not meet quality standards are
    sunk costs and cannot be recovered.
  • As long as rebuild costs are recovered through
    sale of the product, and rebuilding does not
    interfere with normal production, we should
    rebuild.

41
Sell, Scrap, or Rebuild Decisions
  • OserCo has 10,000 defective units thatcost
    1.00 each to make. The units can be scrapped
    now for .40 each or rebuilt at an additional
    cost of .80 per unit.
  • If rebuilt, the units can be sold for the normal
    selling price of 1.50 each. Rebuilding the
    10,000 defective units will prevent the
    production of 10,000 new units that would also
    sell for 1.50.
  • Should OserCo scrap or rebuild?

42
Sell, Scrap, or Rebuild Decisions
10,000 units 0.40 per unit
10,000 units 1.50 per unit
43
Sell, Scrap, or Rebuild Decisions
10,000 units 0.80 per unit
10,000 units (1.50 - 1.00) per unit
44
Sell, Scrap, or Rebuild Decisions
OserCo should scrap the units now.
If OserCo fails to include the opportunity
cost,the rework option would show a return of
7,000,mistakenly making rebuild appear more
favorable.
45
Joint Product Decisions
Two or more products produced from acommon input
are called joint products.
Product 1
Joint costs arethe costs ofprocessing prior to
the split-off point.
Joint Costs
Product 2
Product 3
The split-off point is the point in a process
where joint products can be recognized as
separate products.
46
Joint Product Decisions
  • Businesses are often faced with the decision
    to sell partially completed products at the
    split-off point or to process them to completion.
  • General rule process further only if
    incremental revenues gt incremental costs.

47
Joint Product Decisions
Ames Co. produces two products, A and B, from
this process.
Should the products besold at split-off
orprocessed further?
48
Joint Product Decisions
Product A incremental revenue 120,000 -
70,000 Product B incremental revenue
65,000 - 50,000
Decision Process product A, but sell product B
at the split-off point. Note that the 100,000
joint cost is irrelevant to the processing
decision.
49
Joint Product Decisions
Joint costs are really common costs incurred to
simultaneously produce a variety of end products.
Joint costs are commonly allocated to end
products on the basis of the relative sales value
of each product or on some other basis.
50
Joint Product Decisions
  • Joint costs are not relevantin decisions
    regarding what to do witha product after the
    split-off point.
  • As a general rule . . .
  • It is always profitable to continue processing a
    joint product after the split-off point so long
    as the incremental revenue exceeds the
    incremental processing costs.

51
End of Chapter 20
Hey dude,its party time!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com