Title: Advanced propulsion systems 3 lectures
1Advanced propulsion systems (3 lectures)
- Hypersonic propulsion background (Lecture 1)
- Why hypersonic propulsion?
- Whats different at hypersonic conditions?
- Real gas effects (non-constant CP, dissociation)
- Aircraft range
- How to compute thrust?
- Idealized compressible flow (Lecture 2)
- Isentropic, shock, friction (Fanno)
- Heat addition at constant area (Rayleigh), T, P
- Hypersonic propulsion applications (Lecture 3)
- Ramjet/scramjets
- Pulse detonation engines
2Why use air even if youre going to space?
- Carry only fuel, not fuel O2, while in
atmosphere - 8x mass savings (H2-O2), 4x (hydrocarbons)
- Actually even more than this when the ln( ) term
in the Brequet range equation is considered - Use aerodynamic lifting body rather than
ballistic trajectory - Ballistic need Thrust/weight gt 1
- Lifting body, steady flight Lift (L) weight
(mg) Thrust (T) Drag (D), Thrust/weight L/D
gt 1 for any decent airfoil, even at hypersonic
conditions
L
T
D
mg
3Whats different about hypersonic propulsion?
- Stagnation temperature Tt - measure of total
energy (thermal kinetic) of flow - is really
large even before heat addition - materials
problems - T static temperature - T measured by a
thermometer moving with the flow - Tt temperature of the gas if it is decelerated
adiabatically to M 0 - ? gas specific heat ratio Cp/Cv M Mach
number u/(?RT)1/2 - Stagnation pressure - measure of usefulness of
flow (ability to expand flow) is really large
even before heat addition - structural problems - P static pressure - P measured by a pressure
gauge moving with the flow - Pt pressure of the gas if it is decelerated
reversibly and adiabatically to M 0 - Large Pt means no mechanical compressor needed at
large M
4Whats different about hypersonic propulsion?
- Why are Tt and Pt so important? Isentropic
expansion to Pe Pa (optimal exit pressure
yielding maximum thrust) yields - but its difficult to add heat at high M
without major loss of stagnation pressure
5Whats different about hypersonic propulsion?
- High temperatures ? not constant, also molecular
weight not constant - dissociation - use GASEQ
(http//www.gaseq.co.uk) to compute stagnation
conditions - Example calculation standard atmosphere at
100,000 ft - T1 227K, P1 0.0108 atm, c1 302.7 m/s, h1
70.79 kJ/kg - (atmospheric data from http//www.digitaldutch.co
m/atmoscalc/) - Pick P2 gt P1, compress isentropically, note new
T2 and h2 - 1st Law h1 u12/2 h2 u22/2 since u2 0,
h2 h1 (M1c1)2/2 or M1 2(h2-h1)/c121/2 - Simple relations ok up to M 7
- Dissociation not as bad as might otherwise be
expected at ultra high T, since P increases
faster than T - Problems
- Ionization not considered
- Stagnation temperature relation valid even if
shocks, friction, etc. (only depends on 1st law)
but stagnation pressure assumes isentropic flow - Calculation assumed adiabatic deceleration -
radiative loss (from surfaces and ions in gas)
may be important
6Whats different about hypersonic propulsion?
7Breguet range equation
- Consider aircraft in level flight
- (Lift weight) at constant flight
- velocity u1 (thrust drag)
- Combine expressions for lift drag and integrate
from time t 0 to t R/u1 (R range distance
traveled), i.e. time required to reach
destination, to obtain Breguet Range Equation -
8Rocket equation
- If acceleration (?u) rather than range in steady
flight is desired neglecting drag (D) and
gravitational pull (W), Force mass x
acceleration or Thrust mvehicledu/dt - Since flight velocity u1 is not constant, overall
efficiency is not an appropriate performance
parameter instead use specific impulse (Isp)
thrust per unit weight (on earth) flow rate of
fuel ( oxidant if two reactants carried), i.e.
Thrust mdotfuelgearthIsp - Integrate to obtain Rocket Equation
- Of course gravity and atmospheric drag will
increase effective ?u requirement beyond that
required strictly by orbital mechanics
9Brequet range equation - comments
- Range (R) for aircraft depends on
- ?o (propulsion system) - dependd on u1 for
airbreathing propulsion - QR (fuel)
- L/D (lift to drag ratio of airframe)
- g (gravity)
- Fuel consumption (minitial/mfinal) minitial -
mfinal fuel mass used (or fuel oxidizer, if
not airbreathing) - This range does not consider fuel needed for
taxi, takeoff, climb, decent, landing, fuel
reserve, etc. - Note (irritating) ln( ) or exp( ) term in both
Breguet and Rocket -
- because you have to use more fuel at the
beginning of the flight, since youre carrying
fuel you wont use until the end of the flight -
if not for this it would be easy to fly around
the world without refueling and the Chinese would
have sent skyrockets into orbit thousands of
years ago!
10Brequet range equation - examples
- Fly around the world (g 9.8 m/s2) without
refueling - R 40,000 km
- Use hydrocarbon fuel (QR 4.5 x 107 J/kg),
- Good propulsion system (?o 0.25)
- Good airframe (L/D 20),
- Need minitial/mfinal 5.7 - aircraft has to be
mostly fuel - mfuel/minitial (minitial -
mfinal)/minitial 1 - mfinal/minitial 1 -
1/5.7 0.825! - thats why no one flew around
with world without refueling until 1986 - To get into orbit from the earths surface
- ?u 8000 m/s
- Use a good rocket propulsion system (e.g. Space
Shuttle main engines, ISP 400 sec) - Need minitial/mfinal 7.7 cant get this good a
mass ratio in a single vehicle - need staging -
thats why no one put an object into earth orbit
until 1957
11Thrust computation
- In airbreathing and rocket propulsion we need
THRUST (force acting on vehicle) - How much push can we get from a given amount of
fuel? - Well start by showing that thrust depends
primarily on the difference between the engine
inlet and exhaust gas velocity, then compute
exhaust velocity for various types of flows
(isentropic, with heat addition, with friction,
etc.)
12Thrust computation
- Control volume for thrust computation - in frame
of reference moving with the engine
13Thrust computation - steady flight
- Newtons 2nd law Force rate of change of
momentum - At takeoff u1 0 for rocket no inlet so u1 0
always - For hydrogen or hydrocarbon-air FAR ltlt 1
typically 0.06 at stoichiometric
14Thrust computation
- But how to compute exit velocity (ue) and exit
pressure (Pe) as a function of ambient pressure
(Pa), flight velocity (u1)? Need compressible
flow analysis, coming next - Also - one can obtain a given thrust with large
(Pe - Pa)Ae and small mdota(1FAR)ue - u1 or
vice versa - which is better, i.e. for given u1,
Pa, mdota and FAR, what Pe will give most thrust?
Differentiate thrust equation and set 0 - Momentum balance on exit (see next slide)
- Combine
- ? Optimal performance occurs for exit pressure
ambient pressure
151D momentum balance - constant-area duct
- Coefficient of friction (Cf)
16Thrust computation
- But wait - this just says Pe Pa is an extremum
- is it min or max? - but Pe Pa at the extremum cases so
- Maximum thrust if d2(Thrust)/d(Pe)2 lt 0 ? dAe/dPe
lt 0 - we will show this is true for supersonic
exit conditions - Minimum thrust if d2(Thrust)/d(Pe)2 gt 0 ? dAe/dPe
gt 0 - we will show this is would be true for
subsonic exit conditions, but for subsonic, Pe
Pa always since acoustic (pressure) waves can
travel up the nozzle, equalizing the pressure to
Pa, so its a moot point for subsonic exit
velocities
17Propulsive, thermal, overall efficiency
- Thermal efficiency (?th)
-
- Propulsive efficiency (?p)
- Overall efficiency (?o)
- this is the most important efficiency in
determining aircraft performance (see Breguet
range equation)
18Propulsive, thermal, overall efficiency
- Note on propulsive efficiency
- ?p ? 1 as u1/ue ? 1 ? ue is only slightly larger
than u1 - But then you need large mdota to get required
Thrust mdota(ue - u1) - but this is how
commercial turbofan engines work! - In other words, the best propulsion system
accelerates an infinite mass of air by an
infinitesimal ?u - Fundamentally this is because Thrust (ue - u1),
but energy required to get that thrust (ue2 -
u12)/2 - For hypersonic propulsion systems, u1 is large,
ue - u1 ltlt u1, so propulsive efficiency usually
high (I.e. close to 1)
19References
- Archer, R. D. and Saarlas, M., An Introduction to
Aerospace Propulsion, Prentice-Hall, 1996 - Hill, P. G. and Peterson, C. R., Mechanics and
Thermodynamics of Propulsion, 2nd ed.,
Addison-Wesley, 1992