Common Integrated Justice System

1
Common Integrated Justice System January 31, 2007
2
Discussion Topics

• Common Integrated Justice System (CIJS) Update
• Court Administration System Contract Overview
• Contract Governance
• Questions and Discussion

2
3
CIJS Criminal Courts
Crime Analysis (Fusion Centers)
State T-DEx
Federal N-DEx
Cross Jurisdiction Data Sharing (GJXML)
Law Enforcement and Jail
Corrections and Community Supervision
Courts Prosecution
Juvenile Case Management System (JCMS)
Juvenile Information System (JIS) / TJPC
Caseworker
4
Procurement Process

• Fourteen Counties and TAC
• Collaborative Requirements Analysis
• Collaborative RFP Process
• Unanimous Decision to Award to Tyler Technologies
• CUC Negotiated Option to Buy for Member Counties

4
5
Procurement Process

• Galveston
• Gregg
• Harris
• Rockwall
• San Patricio
• Travis
• Williamson

• Counties
• Bell
• Bexar
• Collin
• Dallas
• Denton
• El Paso
• Fort Bend

5
6
Court System

• Implemented in Dallas (Civil), Kaufman and Wise
  Counties
• Collin, Denton, Fort Bend, Grayson, Gregg,
  Guadalupe, Tarrant and Williamson Counties
  Underway
• Dallas (Criminal) and Galveston in Contract
  Process
• Thirty-seven (37) Counties Eligible

6
7
Court System

• All Courts
• Prosecution
• Office of Court Administration Compliance
• Supreme Courts Judicial Committee on Information
  Technology (JCIT) Requests Expansion for All
  Counties

7
8
Other Modules

• Optional Modules from Tyler Technologies
• Law Enforcement
• Jail
• Check Processing
• Adult Probation
• Seventeen (17) Urban Counties are Tyler Legacy
  Customers

8
9
Contract

• Shared Software License Cost
• As more counties participate, cost per county is
  reduced.
• Early adopters eligible for rebates.
• Shared Modification and Interface Costs.
• Each County responsible for implementation costs.

9
10
Contract Process

• Budget Proposal at no cost to County
• Participation Agreement County pays for
  Implementation Plan
• Go/No Go After Reviewing Implementation Plan

10
11
Contract Governance

• Oversight Board
• Representative from each County
• Policy Makers/Key Staff
• Set Direction and Resolve Issues
• Technical Committee
• Representative from each County
• Subject Matter Experts/Technical
• Day to day collaboration
• User Group Quarterly Meetings

11
12
CUC Contract Administration

• Coordinate and Support Project Governance
• Manage Software Customizations and Release
  Testing
• Facilitate Cross-County Collaboration
• Identify and Resolve Contract Issues
• Facilitate Texas User Group
• Actual Costs shared among participating Counties
  based on Population

12