Title: The Role of States in Public Health Nutrition
1The Role of States in Public Health Nutrition
- Assessment
- Policy Development
- Assurance
2Assessment
- State level assessment of population nutrition
assessment - Identify high risk areas of state
- Coordinate state and local assessment initiatives
- Provide data to local agencies
- Provide technical assistance training
3Assurance
- Manage/administer/deliver federal nutrition
programs WIC, NSLP, SNAP - Manage/deliver state funded programs MSS
- Build state capacity to address nutrition
- Technical assistance/capacity building,
networking, communication - Secure and distribute resources for long term
goals
4Policy Development
- Advise governor and legislature
- State-level planning
5Washington States Nutrition Physical
Activity Plan
6Brief History of the Plan
2001-2002
- Received CDC funding to develop state plan
- Convened advisory group including
- Nutrition and physical activity professionals
- Hunger advocates
- State agencies and organizations - OSPI, WSDA,
BCW - Community advocates and other stakeholders
- Conducted formative research, identified target
populations and specific strategies - Plan launched with 5-year implementation grant
from CDC
2003
7Vision Purpose
- Vision Washington residents will enjoy good
nutrition, have active lives and live in healthy
communities. - PurposeProvide a framework in which policy
makers at the state, local, and institutional
levels can work together to support and build
environments that make it easier for Washington
residents to choose healthy foods and to be
physically active in order to - Slow the increase in the proportion of adults who
are obese - Reduce rates of chronic disease
- Improve the quality of life
8Creating Supportive Environments
Health and well being are affected by a dynamic
interaction between biology, behavior, and the
environment, an interaction that unfolds over the
life course of individuals, families, and
communities.
Institute of Medicine. Promoting Health
Intervention Strategies from Social and
Behavioral Research.
Washington D.C. National Academy Press, 2000
9Grounded in the Socio-ecological Model
10Criteria for Objectives Recommendations
- Related to obesity and chronic disease prevention
- Population based, potential to affect a large
portion of the population - Evidence based, theoretically sound, or
recommended by nationally recognized authorities
or experts - Measurable objectives
11The Six Objectives
- Objectives
- ? Access to Health Promoting Foods
- ? Food Insecurity
- ? Proportion of Mothers Who Breastfeed Their
Infants Toddlers - ? Free and Low-Cost Opportunities for Recreation
and Physical Activity - ? Physical Activity Opportunities for Children
- ? Active Community Environments
12Putting the Plan into Action
2003 - 2008
13Planned Activities
- Partner with agencies, coalitions local
communities - Provide technical assistance, training, tools
resources - Support pilot programs and development of local
action plans - Encourage development implementation of policy
recommendations by sector
14Planned Outcomes
- Short-Term
- Partnerships established working
- Partners knowledgeable about environ. policy
issues that impact nutrition phys. activity - Partners incorporate Plan into their work plans
- Financial support for nutrition phys. activity
efforts increases
- Intermediate
- Changes in policy the environment
- Increased phys. activity improved dietary
behavior
- Long-Term
- Decreased obesity
- Decreased incidence of chronic disease
15Partners of the Plan
- Partners pledge to help put the State Plan into
action by working on one or more of the
objectives - Purpose
- Build partnerships
- Facilitate communication
- Support assessment evaluation
16Partners of the Plan Membership
- Members Represent
- More than 250 organizations in 31 counties,
including - Local state health departments
- Healthcare organizations
- Schools universities
- Businesses
- Community groups, nonprofit organizations
coalitions - Government agencies
- Tribal organizations
Cumulative Membership 2003-2008
17Involvement with Objectives 2004-08
Nutrition Objectives
Physical Activity Objectives
Access to Healthy Foods
Food Insecurity
Breast-feeding
Low Cost Recreation
PA for Children
Active Community Environ.
18Partners Scope of Influence 2004-08
19Setting Impacted By Partners 2004-08
20The State Plan in Our Communities
- Healthy Communities Projects
- The Healthy Communities model was developed to
help communities - Identify barriers and assets that impact
nutrition and physical activity - Develop an action plan based on strategies from
the State Plan - Create policies and community environments that
support good nutrition and opportunities for
physical activity for all residents - Success of pilot projects in Moses Lake and Mount
Vernon has led 6 other communities to adopt the
Healthy Communities model
21The State Plan in Our Communities
- Steps to a Healthier WA
- Prevent chronic disease using policy and
environmental changes that support healthy
communities and organizations - 2008 Preventive Health Health Services Block
Grants - Funded 9 local health jurisdictions and tribes to
develop or implement policies that promote
physical activity and nutrition - Active Community Environments
- Promote physical activity through transportation
policy and urban planning approaches
22Community Projects Addressing Plan Priorities
23Partners in Action
- Quarterly update
- Showcase of activities related to 6 objectives
- Work of partners across the state
- Diverse settings
www.wapartnersinaction.org
24Access to Healthy Foods
- Rainier Valley Healthy Restaurant Initiative
- Partner Healthy Active Rainier Valley
Coalition - 16 restaurants in SE Seattle
- Dietitians helped identify healthy options based
on guidelines for calories, fat, sodium, fiber
fruit/vegetable servings - Brochure publicized participating restaurants and
includes a map marked with bike friendly routes
25Reduce Food Insecurity
- Co-Pay Elimination for Reduced-Price School Meals
- Partner OSPI
- 2006-07 State eliminated of co-pay for breakfast
- 2007-09 State continued breakfast co-pay
elimination and eliminated the .40 lunch co-pay
for K-3 students. - Reduced-price breakfast co-pay elimination
associated with - 36 ? in participation in 2006-07
- 1,270,000 more meals
26Breastfeeding
- Moses Lake Breastfeeding Resolution
- Partner Moses Lake Breastfeeding Coalition
- In 2006, the Moses Lake City Council adopted a
resolution that states - The City supports a mothers right to breastfeed
on public or private property where the mother
and child are otherwise authorized to be, and
encourages our citizens to recognize the benefits
of breastfeeding and allow a mother to breastfeed
anywhere any other person is allowed to be. - MLBC offered assistance to businesses that wanted
to become more breastfeeding-friendly.
27Increase Free/Low Cost PA Opportunities
Stairwell Mural at Wenatchee Valley Medical
Center Partner Steps to a Healthier Chelan,
Douglas Okanogan County
- Local high school and college students painted a
mural that covers 3 floors of a WVMC stairwell - The project was designed to
- Promote workplace exercise and opportunities for
active living - Support workplace health initiatives
- Has received very positive responses from
employees and patients
28Increase PA Opportunities for Children
- Active Bodies Active Minds Web Site Toolkits
- Partner UW Center for Public Health Nutrition
- Offer access to field-tested tools and
information on - Importance of limiting screen time encouraging
physical activity for young children - Resources for child care professionals and
families - Evaluation ? screen use in child care
facilities and ? the of providers who talk to
parents about screen use.
www.waabam.org
29Active Community Environments
- Safe Routes to School at Lincoln Elementary
- Partner Mount Vernon Healthy Communities Project
- To ? the number of students who can safely walk
to school, Lincoln Elementary in Mount Vernon - Offers a walking school bus program 3 days/week
in spring fall - Teaches pedestrian/bicycle safety lessons in PE
- Installed missing sidewalks and other safety
features with SRTS grant funding - 30 of students now walk to school (? from 10)
30Lessons Learned from Partners
- Partners described positive experiences
associated with using the Plan to establish
priorities and select activities - New partnerships something that we need to
celebrate! - Plan puts everyone on the same page
- Plan lends legitimacy and a selling point for
local projects - Common barriers and challenges
- Funding, time, resources
- Involving necessary partners and working with
non-traditional partners - Learning curve associated with policy and
environmental approaches
31Plan Revision Process
- Literature/document review Indentify new
research, evidence-based interventions and
national guidelines - Key informant interviewsInput from members of
original advisory committee and others who have
used the Plan - Three stage review processInternal and external
partners including selected experts and project
coordinators
32Increasing Healthcare Sector Involvement
- Primary Prevention Advisory Committee formed by
DOH in 2007 - Internal and external stakeholders including
healthcare providers, health plans, and academia - Developed recommendations for clinical medicines
participation in the State Plan - Examples of policy and environmental approaches
within the healthcare sector incorporated into
Plan
33Other New Features
- Role of families and individuals
- New examples of initiatives across the state
- Updated data and information on cultural
competence, communication strategies and
partnerships - Index to locate sector-related information
- New appendixes and resources
34New and Expanded Resources
- Healthy Communities Toolkit 2 Implementation
Measuring Success - New Partners in Action Site
- Web-based version of the Plan
- Increased access to resources
- Both sites to be launched June 2008