Title: The Impact of Mega Events
1The Impact of Mega Events
Derek Casey Interim Chief Executive Glasgow 2014
Commonwealth Games
2(No Transcript)
3Commonwealth Games
- Second biggest multi-sports event
- 71 countries
- 6500 athletes
- 17 sports all in one City over 12 days
- Delhi 2010
- Glasgow, Scotland will be the 20th edition
4Mega Events
- Benefits are usually exaggerated
- Costs are usually underestimated
- Whatever the view Legacy Planning now crucial
- Changed view of the IOC, FIFA, Commonwealth Games
Federation
5Its not where you start its where you finish
6For Legacy PlanningIt is where you startThats
where you will finish
7Legacy Planning
- Starts the very moment of deciding to bid
usually 10 years before the Event - Starts with a philosophical base why are you
bidding? - Get that wrong and it is very difficult to catch
up or alter course
8Why Bid in the First Place?
9Political Repositioning
- Use of the Mega Event to reposition the City
and/or the country on the world stage - Money is no problem
- Legacy tends to be an afterthought rather than
planned - Part of a process of change in global or regional
politics
10Political RepositioningExamples
- Moscow Olympics in 1980
- Seoul Olympics in 1988
- Kuala Lumpur Commonwealth Games in 1998
- Qatar Asian Games in 2006
- Beijing Olympics in 2008
- Sochi (Russia) Winter Olympics in 2014
11Economic Repositioning
- Use of major events to act as a catalyst for
regeneration or other economic imperative - Less cavalier with initial capital investment
- Strong planned legacy
- Set within a more democratic (and therefore often
critical) public domain
12Economic RepositioningExamples
- Barcelona Olympics in 1992
- Sydney Olympics in 2000
- Manchester Commonwealth Games in 2002
- Glasgow Commonwealth Games in 2014
- Prague Olympic Bid for 2016
- Potential Delhi Olympic Bid for 2020
13Nothing to Prove
- Cities who bid but where neither political nor
economic repositioning is key - Where there is some internal catalytic effect
- Where the rationale is a mix of sport, personal
aspirations, political ambitions and legacy issues
14Nothing to ProveExamples
- Atlanta Olympics in 1996
- Vancouver Winter Olympics in 2010
- London, Paris, Madrid, New York, Moscow Olympic
Bids for 2012
15Mis-Matches
- Where there is a lack of fit between the major
event and the size/capabilities of the City
and/or country - Where often the Event is politically led
- Where often there is a lack of understanding of
the true nature of the event and its
requirements.
16Mis-MatchesExamples
- Sheffield (UK) World Student Games in 1991
- Athens Olympics in 2004
- Qatar Asian Games in 2006
- West Indies World Cricket Cup in 2007
17The Importance of Legacy Planning
18Legacy Planning
- In the absence of legacy planning, the Event can
be the rationale for a celebration - But for most there is a fear of the circus
coming to town and moving on - A good Event and a good Legacy are the twin
pillars of most mega events
19Legacies
- Venues Transport IT
Infrastructure - Hotels Education
- Environment Physical activity
Confidence - Skills Housing
Tourism - Health International
Recognition - Increased inward investment Jobs
- Sports development Quality of life
20The Importance of Early Legacy Planning
21Early Legacy Planning
- Mega events are not a panacea
- Mega events are not capable in themselves to
drive forward all change - Mega events are not a massive generator of
instant economic benefits - Mega events, standing alone, are not the solution
to the many social challenges cities and
countries face
22Early Legacy Planning
- Mega events are capable of harnessing the skills,
enthusiasm and commitment of the community - Mega events are capable of drawing people and
organisations together - Mega events are capable of changing the
perception of a City - With that change comes inward investment, jobs
and improvements to the quality of life for the
community -
But. -
23Early Legacy Planning
- But..
- Only if they are part of national and local
processes for change and development - They must not be led by the Organisers of the
Mega Event. They have a limited life and
concentrating on the Event - The case for a Legacy Unit to ensure that, in
all matters, Government at all levels takes
legacy into account
24Early Legacy Planning
- All need to be addressed by a range of different
organisations - All need to be considered in devising policies
for delivering the Event - All need to be built into restructured strategies
at national and local level to be embedded after
the Event
25The Economic Legacy
26Range of Services
- Catering Venues Transport Printing
- Equipment Technology Advertising
- Human Resources Travel Accounting
- Accommodation Entertainment
- Design Signage Security Fit out
- Construction Flooring IT Seating
- Surfaces Training Clothing Marketing
-
27Procurement Policy
- Right from the start what are the procurement
policies of the Organising Committee? - Vast range of Supplies/Works/Services
- Geared towards local companies or the large
multi-nationals? - Lessons from responsible/ethical tourism
ethical and responsible bidding and staging Mega
Events
28Procurement Policy
- Leaving it all to one major company and its
subsidiaries - Squeezes out local small and medium enterprises
and the second sector - A pyramid approach where each stage is tendered
giving smaller companies opportunities - In Melbourne 83 of contracts went to SMEs
29Procurement
- More buy-in from the whole community if they are
getting a share of the action - Benefits are more wide-spread
- Large, medium and small enterprises are fitter
to bid for action at future Mega Events
30The Economic v Other Legacies
- Do they all need early planning?
31Environmental Legacy
32Environmental Legacy
- Can be overall positive
- Use of brownfield (derelict) sites
- Improvements in bio-diversity
- Use of the Event venues/village as exemplar
- High profile of the event can be used to good
effect
33Social Legacy
34Sports Development
- Crucial to take advantage of the Event
- Setting clear targets for the next 7 years and
beyond - Additional funding essential
- Emphasis on participation and performance
35Skills
- Volunteers for the event
- Potential for skills development and
qualifications - Non-formal education
- Support of the commercial sector
36Social Development
- The Games as part of national processes health
through to economic imperatives and national
pride - The Games as central to initiatives on coaching,
sports medicine, sports science, skills
development - The Games as an exemplar in defined areas
- With a Mega Event no better period for taking
initiatives for change and improvement - The need for a co-ordinated approach among all
agencies
37Community Support84
Source Ashbrook October 2007
38The Economic Case
39Perception of Cities
- 1990 2001 2004 2006
- London 1 1 1 1
- Paris 2 2 2
2 - Frankfurt 3 3 3
3 - Barcelona 11 6 6
4 - Brussels 4 4 4
5 - Amsterdam 5 5 5
6 - Madrid 17 8 7
7
40- The rise of the Spanish Cities shows a
- clear link between a city perceived to be
- doing the most to improve itself and the
- perception that the city is a good location
- for business
41Perception of Cities
- 1990 2001 2004 2006
- Prague 23 21 13 13
- Warsaw
20 18 - Glasgow 10 19
24 26 - Bucharest
29 - Athens 22 29 30 32
42Conclusion
43Entrusted with the Games for four years
- Mike Fennell
- President of the Commonwealth Games Federation
44Trust and Responsibility
- On 3rd August 2014 to hand back the Games
stronger and even more secure - To fulfil all our commitments to all stakeholders
in organising the Games - To leave an extensive range of legacies for the
community, the city, the country and for the
Commonwealth
45Through effective legacy planning, we are all
entrusted with the outcome of the Games for
generations to come
46Our Legacy Aims
- Creating greater and better distributed wealth
- Ensuring higher and more widely shared
achievements - Longer, healthier lives
- Safer and stronger communities
- Environmental sustainability
47(No Transcript)