The Impact of Mega Events - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

The Impact of Mega Events

Description:

Whatever the view Legacy Planning now crucial ... Large, medium and small enterprises are 'fitter' to bid for action at future Mega Events ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1456
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: unkn821
Category:
Tags: events | fitter | impact | mega

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Impact of Mega Events


1
The Impact of Mega Events
Derek Casey Interim Chief Executive Glasgow 2014
Commonwealth Games
2
(No Transcript)
3
Commonwealth Games
  • Second biggest multi-sports event
  • 71 countries
  • 6500 athletes
  • 17 sports all in one City over 12 days
  • Delhi 2010
  • Glasgow, Scotland will be the 20th edition

4
Mega Events
  • Benefits are usually exaggerated
  • Costs are usually underestimated
  • Whatever the view Legacy Planning now crucial
  • Changed view of the IOC, FIFA, Commonwealth Games
    Federation

5
Its not where you start its where you finish
6
For Legacy PlanningIt is where you startThats
where you will finish
7
Legacy Planning
  • Starts the very moment of deciding to bid
    usually 10 years before the Event
  • Starts with a philosophical base why are you
    bidding?
  • Get that wrong and it is very difficult to catch
    up or alter course

8
Why Bid in the First Place?
9
Political Repositioning
  • Use of the Mega Event to reposition the City
    and/or the country on the world stage
  • Money is no problem
  • Legacy tends to be an afterthought rather than
    planned
  • Part of a process of change in global or regional
    politics

10
Political RepositioningExamples
  • Moscow Olympics in 1980
  • Seoul Olympics in 1988
  • Kuala Lumpur Commonwealth Games in 1998
  • Qatar Asian Games in 2006
  • Beijing Olympics in 2008
  • Sochi (Russia) Winter Olympics in 2014

11
Economic Repositioning
  • Use of major events to act as a catalyst for
    regeneration or other economic imperative
  • Less cavalier with initial capital investment
  • Strong planned legacy
  • Set within a more democratic (and therefore often
    critical) public domain

12
Economic RepositioningExamples
  • Barcelona Olympics in 1992
  • Sydney Olympics in 2000
  • Manchester Commonwealth Games in 2002
  • Glasgow Commonwealth Games in 2014
  • Prague Olympic Bid for 2016
  • Potential Delhi Olympic Bid for 2020

13
Nothing to Prove
  • Cities who bid but where neither political nor
    economic repositioning is key
  • Where there is some internal catalytic effect
  • Where the rationale is a mix of sport, personal
    aspirations, political ambitions and legacy issues

14
Nothing to ProveExamples
  • Atlanta Olympics in 1996
  • Vancouver Winter Olympics in 2010
  • London, Paris, Madrid, New York, Moscow Olympic
    Bids for 2012

15
Mis-Matches
  • Where there is a lack of fit between the major
    event and the size/capabilities of the City
    and/or country
  • Where often the Event is politically led
  • Where often there is a lack of understanding of
    the true nature of the event and its
    requirements.

16
Mis-MatchesExamples
  • Sheffield (UK) World Student Games in 1991
  • Athens Olympics in 2004
  • Qatar Asian Games in 2006
  • West Indies World Cricket Cup in 2007

17
The Importance of Legacy Planning
18
Legacy Planning
  • In the absence of legacy planning, the Event can
    be the rationale for a celebration
  • But for most there is a fear of the circus
    coming to town and moving on
  • A good Event and a good Legacy are the twin
    pillars of most mega events

19
Legacies
  • Venues Transport IT
    Infrastructure
  • Hotels Education
  • Environment Physical activity
    Confidence
  • Skills Housing
    Tourism
  • Health International
    Recognition
  • Increased inward investment Jobs
  • Sports development Quality of life

20
The Importance of Early Legacy Planning
21
Early Legacy Planning
  • Mega events are not a panacea
  • Mega events are not capable in themselves to
    drive forward all change
  • Mega events are not a massive generator of
    instant economic benefits
  • Mega events, standing alone, are not the solution
    to the many social challenges cities and
    countries face

22
Early Legacy Planning
  • Mega events are capable of harnessing the skills,
    enthusiasm and commitment of the community
  • Mega events are capable of drawing people and
    organisations together
  • Mega events are capable of changing the
    perception of a City
  • With that change comes inward investment, jobs
    and improvements to the quality of life for the
    community

  • But.


23
Early Legacy Planning
  • But..
  • Only if they are part of national and local
    processes for change and development
  • They must not be led by the Organisers of the
    Mega Event. They have a limited life and
    concentrating on the Event
  • The case for a Legacy Unit to ensure that, in
    all matters, Government at all levels takes
    legacy into account

24
Early Legacy Planning
  • All need to be addressed by a range of different
    organisations
  • All need to be considered in devising policies
    for delivering the Event
  • All need to be built into restructured strategies
    at national and local level to be embedded after
    the Event

25
The Economic Legacy
26
Range of Services
  • Catering Venues Transport Printing
  • Equipment Technology Advertising
  • Human Resources Travel Accounting
  • Accommodation Entertainment
  • Design Signage Security Fit out
  • Construction Flooring IT Seating
  • Surfaces Training Clothing Marketing

27
Procurement Policy
  • Right from the start what are the procurement
    policies of the Organising Committee?
  • Vast range of Supplies/Works/Services
  • Geared towards local companies or the large
    multi-nationals?
  • Lessons from responsible/ethical tourism
    ethical and responsible bidding and staging Mega
    Events

28
Procurement Policy
  • Leaving it all to one major company and its
    subsidiaries
  • Squeezes out local small and medium enterprises
    and the second sector
  • A pyramid approach where each stage is tendered
    giving smaller companies opportunities
  • In Melbourne 83 of contracts went to SMEs

29
Procurement
  • More buy-in from the whole community if they are
    getting a share of the action
  • Benefits are more wide-spread
  • Large, medium and small enterprises are fitter
    to bid for action at future Mega Events

30
The Economic v Other Legacies
  • Do they all need early planning?

31
Environmental Legacy
32
Environmental Legacy
  • Can be overall positive
  • Use of brownfield (derelict) sites
  • Improvements in bio-diversity
  • Use of the Event venues/village as exemplar
  • High profile of the event can be used to good
    effect

33
Social Legacy
34
Sports Development
  • Crucial to take advantage of the Event
  • Setting clear targets for the next 7 years and
    beyond
  • Additional funding essential
  • Emphasis on participation and performance

35
Skills
  • Volunteers for the event
  • Potential for skills development and
    qualifications
  • Non-formal education
  • Support of the commercial sector

36
Social Development
  • The Games as part of national processes health
    through to economic imperatives and national
    pride
  • The Games as central to initiatives on coaching,
    sports medicine, sports science, skills
    development
  • The Games as an exemplar in defined areas
  • With a Mega Event no better period for taking
    initiatives for change and improvement
  • The need for a co-ordinated approach among all
    agencies

37
Community Support84
Source Ashbrook October 2007
38
The Economic Case
39
Perception of Cities
  • 1990 2001 2004 2006
  • London 1 1 1 1
  • Paris 2 2 2
    2
  • Frankfurt 3 3 3
    3
  • Barcelona 11 6 6
    4
  • Brussels 4 4 4
    5
  • Amsterdam 5 5 5
    6
  • Madrid 17 8 7
    7

40
  • The rise of the Spanish Cities shows a
  • clear link between a city perceived to be
  • doing the most to improve itself and the
  • perception that the city is a good location
  • for business

41
Perception of Cities
  • 1990 2001 2004 2006
  • Prague 23 21 13 13
  • Warsaw
    20 18
  • Glasgow 10 19
    24 26
  • Bucharest
    29
  • Athens 22 29 30 32

42
Conclusion
43
Entrusted with the Games for four years
  • Mike Fennell
  • President of the Commonwealth Games Federation

44
Trust and Responsibility
  • On 3rd August 2014 to hand back the Games
    stronger and even more secure
  • To fulfil all our commitments to all stakeholders
    in organising the Games
  • To leave an extensive range of legacies for the
    community, the city, the country and for the
    Commonwealth

45
Through effective legacy planning, we are all
entrusted with the outcome of the Games for
generations to come
46
Our Legacy Aims
  • Creating greater and better distributed wealth
  • Ensuring higher and more widely shared
    achievements
  • Longer, healthier lives
  • Safer and stronger communities
  • Environmental sustainability

47
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com