Title: Investments in Education and Socioeconomic Development
1Investments in Education and Socioeconomic
Development
- José Pablo Arellano
- Mexico City, August 2003
2Contribution of education to development
- Return on investment in education
- In Latin America, rates of return are among the
highest - Return on early investment in education is
greater - Primary education has greatest return
3Return on investment in education
(Source Psacharopoulos and Patrinos, 2002)
4Return on an additional year of schooling
(Source Psacharopoulos and Patrinos, 2002)
5Contribution of education to growth
- Review of growth theories, more emphasis on human
capital (worker productivity and innovation) - Between one tenth and one third of growth due to
human capital - One additional year of schooling among the work
force increases per capita GDP by 6 over the
long term - Contribution has been greater for developing
countries in past few decades
6Competitiveness and education
- Surveys on international competitiveness
- In 19 Latin American countries, math and science
achievement averaged 3.6 vs.5.6 in Eastern
Europe and 4.9 in East Asia. Public school
quality averaged 2.7, 4.9, and 4.2, respectively. - Education level of work force growing slower than
in other regions
7 Availability and Retention of Engineers
High-income OECD
East Asia and Pacific
Eastern Europe
Latin America
8Secondary Completion
9Equity
- Growing role of education due to increased demand
for qualifications - Questioning of other instruments for
redistribution of income and wealth
10(No Transcript)
11Financing amount of resources
- In 1990s, public investment in education showed
highest growth in LAC, jumping from 2.9 of GDP
to 3.9. - Future resources will depend on economic growth
(salaries), lower demographic pressure, greater
demand for coverage at costlier levels, family
contribution (economic growth and policies)
12Expanding coverage
- Universal coverage of primary education increases
demand for secondary and tertiary. Higher costs
per student. - Achieving full secondary education coverage.
Types of problems children never enrolled, late
enrolment, poor performance (low achievement,
repeaters), dropouts.
13(No Transcript)
14Poor attending school by age
6 to 14 years old
15Population attending school, by age and income
6 to 14 years old
16Percentage of children in poorest two quintiles
attending school at
6 and 8-9 years of age
100
97
95
95
95
94
90
83
82
82
80
76
74
73
73
70
70
60
50
50
40
35
34
30
20
10
0
Colombia 2000
Bolivia 1997
Brasil 1996
Rep Dominicana
Guatemala 1999
Haití 1994-95
Nicaragua 1998
Perú 2000
1996
Minimum attendance
Maximum attendance
17(No Transcript)
18Latin America (18 countries) Dropout rates for
adolescents aged 15-19, by area Overall dropout
rate Urban areas
Rural areas
Simple average
Simple average
19Clear progress in reducing dropout rates in the
1990s. For 18 countries in LAC, rate dropped from
45 to 37 (from 32 to 27 in urban areas, and
from 64 to 51 in rural areas)
- More emphasis needed on starting school on time
- Policies on incentives and benefits according to
age of children - Reducing age children enter school vs. increasing
coverage at an older age - Dropout rates associated with teenage pregnancy
very high and have increased in most of the
countries in past 15 years - Policies to finance expansion of higher education
20Breakdown of spending (S)
- S HS x H x T
- S/GDP (HSxH/pcGDP)x(T/ST)x(ST/N)x(N/P)
- HS Hourly teacher salary
- H Hours of teaching per teacher contract
- T Teachers
- ST Students
- N School-age population
- P Total population
- GS Grade-age students
- RS Late-starter and/or repeater students
21(No Transcript)
22(No Transcript)
23Quality student achievement
- International test results
- Is it a resource problem?
- How to improve the use of resources?
24PISA 2000 performance by 15-year-old students
(reading comprehension test)
3
5
100
5.7
9.5
6
9
18.5
18.7
90
19
22
80
31
41
47
70
49
26
26
46
32
60
50
50
33
40
57
42
28
21
28
30
43
54
20
23
12
23
20
10
9
16
5
5
6
5
0
New Zealand
OECD average
Argentina
Brazil
Chile
Mexico
Peru
Finland
Korea
25PISA 2000 performance by 15-year-old population
(reading comprehension test)
26(No Transcript)
27Differences in math test performance
(Korea vs. LAC 90th percentile)
700
676
650
600
550
536
502
500
496
464
450
431
400
350
5
10
25
50
75
90
95
Percentile
Korea
Argentina
Brazil
Chile
Mexico
Perú
28Spending per student (primary) vs. reading test
performance
(PISA 2000)
600
Fin
550
Aus
Kor
U.K.
Swe.
Jap
Nor
Fra
U.S.A.
Czech Rep.
500
Spa.
Austria
Ger.
Swi.
Den.
Ita
Gre
Hun
Pol
Por
Performance
450
Mex
Chi
Arg
400
Bra
350
Peru
300
5
10
15
20
25
30
Spending per student / per capita GDP
29System governance
- Decision-making and decision-makers Who is
responsible and what are the consequences? - Examples of problems teacher absenteeism, lack
of evaluation politization and/or strong
influence of teacher unions on appointments and
promotions - Overregulated system that maintains
decision-making and administration system
designed prior to mass education - High turnover among senior education ministry
officials and discontinuity of policies - Parents and other stakeholders have little say