Human Capital : Theory and Application - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Human Capital : Theory and Application

Description:

Workers add to their stock of human capital throughout their lives, especially ... but because it certifies that the worker is cut out for smart worker ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:684
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: AAl4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Human Capital : Theory and Application


1
Human Capital Theory and Application
  • Sung Jun Jo
  • 11.05.2005

2
Who Are Workers? (Human Resources)
  • Cost?
  • Assets?
  • Business partner?

3
Agenda
  • Introduction
  • Schooling and Signaling
  • On the Job Training
  • Application-Executive Pay Issue
  • Discussion

4
Introduction
  • Human capital refers to the knowledge and
    acquired skills a person has that increase his or
    her ability to conduct activities with economic
    value
  • Workers add to their stock of human capital
    throughout their lives, especially via education
    and job experience
  • Combination of . (Fitz-enz, 2000)
  • traits brought into job
  • ability to learn
  • motivation to share

5
A Model of Human Capital Theory
Individual Input (Investment)
Education
Outcomes
Productivity
Earnings
Social Input (Investment)
Citizenship
Social Efficacy
Source Swanson Holton III, 2001, p.110
6
Evolution of Human Capital Theory
  • Foundations
  • A. Smith, J. S. Mill, A. Marshall
  • J. Mincer (1958) Yrs of work forgone to pursue
    education were rationally compensated with high
    wage
  • S. Fabricant (1959) Intangible assets
  • G. Becker (1960) ROR of difference in education
  • T. Schultz (1961) US income has been increased
    in higher rate than combined amount of land,
    working hours and capital used to produce
  • Nobel Prize Winners
  • T. Schultz, G. Becker,
  • M. Friedman, S. Kuznets, R. Solow

7
The Schooling Model
  • A persons decision maximizes the present value
    of lifetime earnings
  • The rate of discount (r) plays a crucial role in
    determining whether a person chooses to go to
    school
  • Wage-Schooling Locus salary for each level of
    schooling
  • Marginal Rate of Return to Schooling How much
    earnings increase if a person stays in school 1
    more year
  • Stopping rule when it is optimal to quit school
    and enter job market (MRRr)

8
Potential Earnings Streams
9
Schooling Decision
MRR
r
r
10
Factors That Lead Different Level of Schooling
  • Differences in the Rate of Discount
  • Different schooling decisions simply place
    them at different points of the common locus
  • Differences in Ability
  • Higher ability levels shift the MRR to the
    right, so, earnings gain resulting from an
    additional year of schooling outweighs the
    increase in forgone earning

11
Signaling
  • Education does(needs) not increase productivity
    at all, but signal a workers qualifications to
    potential employers who do not have private
    information
  • Education increases earnings not because it
    increases productivity but because it certifies
    that the worker is cut out for smart worker
  • Self selection constraints
  • 1. Level of education of signaling must be
    such that non-smart workers are unwilling or
    unable to attain it.
  • 2. Achieving given level of education must be
    cheaper for the high smart workers than for
    non-smart worker

12
Self-Selection

NSWs edu cost curve
SWs edu cost curve
W
T1
T2
13
On the Job Training
  • Training increases a workers productivity (HC
    stock) after training
  • Training is an investment with initial costs and
    expected future returns
  • The returns are lost in the event of a separation
  • Should the firm invest?
  • Not if the skills are easily portable (worker can
    leave)
  • Should the worker invest?
  • Not if the skills are firm-specific (firm can
    layoff)

14
Who Bears Costs of Firm Specific Training?
  • Since there is no commitment to stay on the part
    of the worker after training occurred firms will
    not want to bear the costs of training when
    skills are general
  • Since there is no certainty that the job will
    remain profitable in the future, the employee
    will not want to bear the costs of training for
    skills that can be valued only by the current
    employer (specific)

15
Transferable Human Capital
The employee will want to bear the full cost by
accepting lower wage during training
VMPW2
w1
Time
training
16
Firm-Specific Human Capital
The employer will want to bear the full cost by
paying above the market value to reduce turnover
VMP
w2
w1
Time
training
17
Predictions of Human Capital
  • When skills are transferable
  • Employees should be bearing the cost
  • Wages of trainees (compared to non trainees)
    should be lower during training
  • Employer can offer what the market pays for the
    new skills acquired after training
  • Given that training increases skills
  • Wages of trainees (compared to non trainees)
    should be greater after training at a given
    employer

18
Predictions of the Human Capital (Cont.)
  • To reduce transaction costs after firm-specific
    training
  • Workers should be paid above the market value of
    their transferable skills.
  • Paying above market should minimize
    transaction(search) cost.
  • Butif contracts can be renegotiated, the firm
    does not have to raise wages until faced with a
    potential quit (Beaudry and DiNardo ).

19
Mincer Equation (1994)
log w rs ß1t ß2t2 other variables
  • The Mincer equation captures the important
    empirical regularities
  • 1) increase in earnings with schooling
  • 2) concavity of log earnings in experience
  • 3) parallelism in log earnings experiences
    profiles for different education groups

See the attached file for the further discussion
20
Executive Pay (Murphy Zabojnik, 2004)
  • Base salary and bonuses of Forbes 800 CEOs
    increased from 700,000 in 1970 to 2.2 million in
    2000
  • In 1980, CEOs received about 42 times the average
    of workers. By 2000, they were paid 475 times the
    average workers (Milkovich Newman,2002)

21
20 Top-Paid CEOs in 2003
22
Possible Explanations on CEO Compensation
  • Social Comparison relationship to others
  • Economic Approach reward to success, depends on
    company size
  • Agency Theory self-motivated behavior
  • Fat-Cat Theory rent seeking
  • Human Capital Theory increasing investment on
    human capital, type of required skill

23
Hiring Sources-Internal or External
Source Murphy Zabojnik, 2004
24
Hiring from Outside
  • Hiring from outside
  • foregoes valuable specific skills available only
    through internal promotions
  • able to hire from a larger opportunity set of
    managers
  • allows better matching of managers and firms
  • Demougin Siow (1994)
  • Outside hires involve hiring and replacement
    costs which are assumed to be higher than the
    costs of training and promoting from within
  • Internal labor market with high value for
    firm-specific skills

25
Executives as Human Capital
  • As firm-specific capital becomes relatively less
    important, the benefit of better matching becomes
    large relative to the cost of (lost) specific
    capital
  • prevalence of outside hires will increase
  • higher wages for outside hires as the general
    component of skills becomes relatively more
    important than the firm-specific part of skills
  • Potential reason for increasing pay increasing
    outside hire is the change in the composition of
    managerial skills toward more general (market
    valued) skills
  • CEOs skills are transferable across firms and
    industries
  • Greater breadth of knowledge helps management of
    any company
  • Any firm-specific information is more easily
    accessible than before (computerization)

26
Discussions
  • Is education really improving productivity or
    just signaling?
  • How can we measure the value of human capital?
  • What are the implications of human capital
    theories for HRD specialists?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com