Title: Human Capital : Theory and Application
1Human Capital Theory and Application
2Who Are Workers? (Human Resources)
- Cost?
- Assets?
- Business partner?
3Agenda
- Introduction
- Schooling and Signaling
- On the Job Training
- Application-Executive Pay Issue
- Discussion
4Introduction
- Human capital refers to the knowledge and
acquired skills a person has that increase his or
her ability to conduct activities with economic
value - Workers add to their stock of human capital
throughout their lives, especially via education
and job experience - Combination of . (Fitz-enz, 2000)
- traits brought into job
- ability to learn
- motivation to share
5A Model of Human Capital Theory
Individual Input (Investment)
Education
Outcomes
Productivity
Earnings
Social Input (Investment)
Citizenship
Social Efficacy
Source Swanson Holton III, 2001, p.110
6Evolution of Human Capital Theory
- Foundations
- A. Smith, J. S. Mill, A. Marshall
- J. Mincer (1958) Yrs of work forgone to pursue
education were rationally compensated with high
wage - S. Fabricant (1959) Intangible assets
- G. Becker (1960) ROR of difference in education
- T. Schultz (1961) US income has been increased
in higher rate than combined amount of land,
working hours and capital used to produce - Nobel Prize Winners
- T. Schultz, G. Becker,
- M. Friedman, S. Kuznets, R. Solow
7The Schooling Model
- A persons decision maximizes the present value
of lifetime earnings - The rate of discount (r) plays a crucial role in
determining whether a person chooses to go to
school - Wage-Schooling Locus salary for each level of
schooling - Marginal Rate of Return to Schooling How much
earnings increase if a person stays in school 1
more year - Stopping rule when it is optimal to quit school
and enter job market (MRRr)
8Potential Earnings Streams
9Schooling Decision
MRR
r
r
10Factors That Lead Different Level of Schooling
- Differences in the Rate of Discount
- Different schooling decisions simply place
them at different points of the common locus - Differences in Ability
- Higher ability levels shift the MRR to the
right, so, earnings gain resulting from an
additional year of schooling outweighs the
increase in forgone earning
11Signaling
- Education does(needs) not increase productivity
at all, but signal a workers qualifications to
potential employers who do not have private
information - Education increases earnings not because it
increases productivity but because it certifies
that the worker is cut out for smart worker -
- Self selection constraints
- 1. Level of education of signaling must be
such that non-smart workers are unwilling or
unable to attain it. - 2. Achieving given level of education must be
cheaper for the high smart workers than for
non-smart worker
12Self-Selection
NSWs edu cost curve
SWs edu cost curve
W
T1
T2
13On the Job Training
- Training increases a workers productivity (HC
stock) after training - Training is an investment with initial costs and
expected future returns - The returns are lost in the event of a separation
- Should the firm invest?
- Not if the skills are easily portable (worker can
leave) - Should the worker invest?
- Not if the skills are firm-specific (firm can
layoff)
14Who Bears Costs of Firm Specific Training?
- Since there is no commitment to stay on the part
of the worker after training occurred firms will
not want to bear the costs of training when
skills are general - Since there is no certainty that the job will
remain profitable in the future, the employee
will not want to bear the costs of training for
skills that can be valued only by the current
employer (specific)
15Transferable Human Capital
The employee will want to bear the full cost by
accepting lower wage during training
VMPW2
w1
Time
training
16Firm-Specific Human Capital
The employer will want to bear the full cost by
paying above the market value to reduce turnover
VMP
w2
w1
Time
training
17Predictions of Human Capital
- When skills are transferable
- Employees should be bearing the cost
- Wages of trainees (compared to non trainees)
should be lower during training - Employer can offer what the market pays for the
new skills acquired after training - Given that training increases skills
- Wages of trainees (compared to non trainees)
should be greater after training at a given
employer
18Predictions of the Human Capital (Cont.)
- To reduce transaction costs after firm-specific
training - Workers should be paid above the market value of
their transferable skills. - Paying above market should minimize
transaction(search) cost. - Butif contracts can be renegotiated, the firm
does not have to raise wages until faced with a
potential quit (Beaudry and DiNardo ).
19Mincer Equation (1994)
log w rs ß1t ß2t2 other variables
- The Mincer equation captures the important
empirical regularities - 1) increase in earnings with schooling
- 2) concavity of log earnings in experience
- 3) parallelism in log earnings experiences
profiles for different education groups -
See the attached file for the further discussion
20Executive Pay (Murphy Zabojnik, 2004)
- Base salary and bonuses of Forbes 800 CEOs
increased from 700,000 in 1970 to 2.2 million in
2000 - In 1980, CEOs received about 42 times the average
of workers. By 2000, they were paid 475 times the
average workers (Milkovich Newman,2002)
2120 Top-Paid CEOs in 2003
22Possible Explanations on CEO Compensation
- Social Comparison relationship to others
- Economic Approach reward to success, depends on
company size - Agency Theory self-motivated behavior
- Fat-Cat Theory rent seeking
- Human Capital Theory increasing investment on
human capital, type of required skill
23Hiring Sources-Internal or External
Source Murphy Zabojnik, 2004
24Hiring from Outside
- Hiring from outside
- foregoes valuable specific skills available only
through internal promotions - able to hire from a larger opportunity set of
managers - allows better matching of managers and firms
- Demougin Siow (1994)
- Outside hires involve hiring and replacement
costs which are assumed to be higher than the
costs of training and promoting from within - Internal labor market with high value for
firm-specific skills
25Executives as Human Capital
- As firm-specific capital becomes relatively less
important, the benefit of better matching becomes
large relative to the cost of (lost) specific
capital - prevalence of outside hires will increase
- higher wages for outside hires as the general
component of skills becomes relatively more
important than the firm-specific part of skills - Potential reason for increasing pay increasing
outside hire is the change in the composition of
managerial skills toward more general (market
valued) skills - CEOs skills are transferable across firms and
industries - Greater breadth of knowledge helps management of
any company - Any firm-specific information is more easily
accessible than before (computerization)
26Discussions
- Is education really improving productivity or
just signaling? - How can we measure the value of human capital?
- What are the implications of human capital
theories for HRD specialists?