Diffractive and Total pp Cross Sections at LHC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Diffractive and Total pp Cross Sections at LHC

Description:

13th International Conference on Elastic & Diffractive Scattering (13th 'Blois Workshop' ... of the Regge curve. both curves are somewhat high in this plot ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: din5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Diffractive and Total pp Cross Sections at LHC


1
Diffractive and Totalpp Cross Sections at LHC
Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University
13th International Conference on Elastic
Diffractive Scattering (13th "Blois Workshop")
CERN, 29th June - 3rd July 2009
2
Contents
  • References
  • Strategy
  • Unitarity and renormalization
  • Cross sections _at_ LHC
  • Global fit to pp, pp, Kp x-sections
  • The ratio of a'/e
  • Discussion

3
References
http//physics.rockefeller.edu/dino/my.html CDF
PRD 50, 5518 (1994) sel _at_ 1800 546 GeV CDF
PRD 50, 5535 (1994) sD _at_ 1800 546 GeV CDF
PRD 50, 5550 (1994) sT _at_ 1800 546 GeV KG-PR
Physics Reports 101, No.3 (1983) 169-219
Diffractive interactions of hadrons at
high energies KG-95 PLB 358, 379 (1995)
Erratum PLB 363, 268 (1995)
Renormalization of hadronic diffraction CMG-96
PLB 389, 176 (1996) Global fit
to pp, p and Kp cross sections KG-09
arXiv0812.4464v2 hep-ph 26 March 2009
Pomeron intercept and slope the QCD
connection
4
Strategy
  • Froissart bound
    (s in GeV2)
  • For m2 mp2 ? p/m2 104 mb large!
  • If m2 so (mass)2 of a large SUPERglueBALL,
    the bound can be reached at a much lower s-value,
    sF,

  • ?
  • Determine sF and s0 from sTSD
  • Show that vsF lt 1.8 TeV
  • Show that at vs 1.8 TeV Reggeon contributions
    are negligible
  • Get cross section at the LHC as

5
Standard Regge Theory
(KG-95)
  • Parameters
  • s0, s0' and g(t)
  • set s0 s0 (universal IP)
  • g(t) ? g(0) gPPP see KG-PR
  • determine s0 and gPPP how?

6
Unitarity and Renormalization
Pomeron flux
Pomeron-proton x-section
  • Two free parameters s0 and gPPP
  • Obtain product gPPPs0e / 2 from sSD
  • Renormalized Pomeron flux determines s0
  • Get unique solution for gPPP

7
Single Diffraction
KG-95
Pomeron flux
  • Renormalization
  • Flux integral depends on s and s0
  • knee vs-position determines s-value
  • where flux becomes unity ? get so
  • get error in so from error in vs-knee
  • dso/so -2 ds/s -4 (dvs)/vs

8
The value of so - a birds-eye view
KG-95
  • vs (GeV)
  • Cool KG FNAL 14 20
  • Albrow ISR 23.3 26.9
  • Armitage ISR 23.3 27.4
  • ? error in knee position 1 GeV

knee _at_ 22 1 GeV ? s0 1 0.2 GeV
?riple-Pomeron coupling
KG-95
9
The value of so- limited edition
shape of renormalized sSD
shape of Regge s2e
CDF
  • use CDF points to fix the level of renormalized
    curve
  • use E396 points to fix the level of the Regge
    curve
  • both curves are somewhat high in this plot
  • ?adjusting height leads to the same knee
    position

E396
10
The SUPERBALL cross-section
  • Froissart bound
  • Valid above knee at vs 22 GeV and therefore
    at vs 1.8 TeV
  • Use superball mass
  • ? m2 s0 (10.2) GeV2
  • At vs 1.8 TeV Reggeon contributions are
    negligible (see global fit)

? compatible with CGM-96 global fit result of 114
5 mb (see next slides)
11
Global fit to pp, p, Kp x-sections
Global fit to pp, p, Kp x-sections
CMG-96 ?
Use standard Regge theory
  • INPUT
  • RESULTS

negligible
12
sT at LHC from global fit
  • s _at_ LHC vs14 TeV 122 5 mb Born, 114 5 mb
    eikonal
  • ? error estimated from the error in e
    given in CMG-96

Compare with SUPERBALL s(14 TeV) 113 6 mb
caveat so1 GeV2 was used in global fit!
13
Extra the ratio of a'/e
KG-09
The key!
?
14
SUMMARY
  • Froissart bound
  • Valid above the knee at vs 22 GeV in sTSD
    vs. vs
  • and therefore valid at vs 1.8 TeV of the CDF
    measurement
  • Use superball mass s0 (saturated dressed proton
    mass) in the Froissart- Martin formula, where
    s0 is determined from setting the integral of the
    Pomeron flux to unity at vs 22 GeV
  • ? m2 s0 (10.2) GeV2
  • At vs 1.8 TeV Reggeon contributions are
    negligible (see global fit)
  • compatible with CGM-96 global fit result of
    114 5 mb

15
thank you
thank you
16
DISCUSSION
ANY QUESTIONS?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com