Evaluating Physical Activity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Evaluating Physical Activity

Description:

(active) Lifestyles Mortality, Morbidity & Quality of life. Supportive ... Community Workforce Healthy (active) Interest & Development Lifestyles. Awareness ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: SamW49
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evaluating Physical Activity


1
Evaluating Physical Activity
  • Kellie Horton
  • Kinect Australia (VICFIT)

2
Questions
  • What are the issues associated with evaluating PA
    that you are interested in?
  • What types of programs are you involved in?
  • What type of change are you trying to make?
  • At what level.. program, PCP?

3
Purpose of this session
  • Identify some common issues/problems associated
    with evaluation and evaluating PA
  • Discuss the variation in approaches to evaluating
    PA
  • Highlight some of the resources available to you
    for evaluating PA
  • Examine how the planning tool can assist in
    evaluating PA

4
Evaluationthe considerations
  • Why evaluate?
  • To gain insight
  • To make improvements
  • To assess effects
  • What level of evaluation?
  • Program
  • Agency/Organisation
  • Catchment

5
More considerations
  • What type of evaluation?
  • Process
  • Impact
  • Outcome
  • Key issues
  • What do I/ we want to know?
  • How are we going to find it out?
  • How are we going to make others aware of our
    learnings?

6
Examples of outcomes of interest for physical
activity promotion
  • Healthy
  • (active)
  • Lifestyles Mortality,
  • Morbidity
  • Quality of life
  • Supportive
  • Environments
  • (for PA)

  • (Bauman, 2003)

7
PA promotion outcomes
  • Capacity Building
  • Community Workforce Healthy
    (active)
  • Interest Development Lifestyles
  • Awareness
  • Capacity Building
  • Healthy Pships
  • Healthy Settings
    Supportive
  • Public Environments
  • Policy Capacity Building
    (for PA)
  • Organisational Dev.
  • (Bauman, 2003)

8
What to measure?
  • Range of factors that are direct or indirect
    indicators of PA, or determinants of PA
  • Indirect measure- use of recreation facilities,
    parks, walking trails etc.
  • Direct measure- PA population survey pre and post
    program
  • Determinants of PA- perceptions of safety in the
    community
  • As well as process and partnership, capacity
    building issues
  • (Salmon Timperio, 2003. Physical Activity
    Monitoring and Evaluation Toolkit)

9
(No Transcript)
10
Physical Activity measurement
  • Surveys
  • CCHS Strength Training Program Survey
  • Victorian Population Health Survey
  • Diaries/Log books
  • Walking Calendars
  • Observation
  • Pedometers
  • Castlemaine Workplace Walking Challenge
  • Accelerometers
  • (Salmon Timperio, 2003)

11
Measuring Physical Activity Determinants
  • Individual measures
  • Self efficacy for PA
  • Environmental measures
  • Neighbourhood walkability
  • Social measures
  • Social support
  • (Salmon Timperio, 2003)

12
  • So, with all this knowledge how do we decide
  • what change we want to measure?
  • how best to measure this change?

13
Evaluation Planning Framework
  • 6 steps for agencies/organisations/ partnerships
    to develop evaluation plans in parallel with
    health promotion plans
  • Builds on Integrated Health Promotion Resource
    Kit
  • Guidelines for asking the right questions

14
6 steps
  • Describe the program
  • Evaluation preview
  • Focus the evaluation design
  • Collect data
  • Analyse and interpret data
  • Disseminate lessons learnt

15
1. Describe the program
  • Writing goals and objectives
  • Identifying impacts
  • Developing interventions
  • Identifying reach

16
2. Evaluation Preview
  • Engage stakeholders
  • Clarify purpose of evaluation
  • Identifying key questions
  • Identify evaluation resources

17
3. Focus the evaluation design
  • Specify the evaluation design
  • Specify the data collection methods
  • Locate or develop data collection instruments

18
4. Collect data
  • Coordinate data collection
  • What tasks need to be completed?
  • Who should undertake these tasks?
  • When should they be undertaken?
  • What resources are required to do this?

19
5. Analyse and interpret data
  • Analysing the data
  • Type of analysis driven by type of data
  • Interpreting the findings

20
6. Disseminate lessons learnt
  • What reports will be prepared?
  • What formats will be used?
  • How will findings be disseminated?

21
Task
  • An evaluation working group from the PCP PAC has
    been established, you are part of this working
    group. Using the HP Plan provided
  • What is the purpose of the evaluation? (there may
    be a number)
  • What are the key questions?
  • What type of evaluation design will you need to
    use?
  • What data collection methods will be most
    appropriate?

22
Resources
  • CPAN Physical Activity Monitoring and Evaluation
    Toolkit
  • http//www.deakin.edu.au/hbs/cpan/PA_assessment__t
    oolkit.pdf
  • CDC Physical Activity Evaluation Handbook
  • http//www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/physical/handbook/
    index.htm
  • Victorian Population Health Survey
  • www.health.vic.gov.au/healthstatus/vphs_current.ht
    mdownload
  • Active Inform Bulletin (Kinect Australia)
  • To subscribe email physicalactivity.info_at_kinectaus
    tralia.org.au
  • Strength training evaluation tools
  • For more information, Kirstan Corben
    k.corben_at_cgmc.org.au
  • Pedometer challenge tools
  • For more information, John Sawtell
    jsawtell_at_cchc.com.au

23
  • Kellie Horton
  • Kinect Australia
  • e khorton_at_kinectaustralia.org.au
  • p (03) 8320 0127
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com