Exercise 1.2 CPM 3 Fred Thompson - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Exercise 1.2 CPM 3 Fred Thompson

Description:

... for defense and non-defense outlays in current-year dollars from 1990 to 1996. ... D 266 (1 .028)4 = $297 in year 2000. ND 268.4 (1 .03)4 = $302 in year 2000 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:89
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: AGSM
Category:
Tags: cpm | exercise | fred | thompson

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Exercise 1.2 CPM 3 Fred Thompson


1
Exercise 1.2CPM 3Fred Thompson
2
Question 2-aCompute the growth rates for defense
and non-defense outlays in current-year dollars
from 1990 to 1996. Divide that growth into its
real and price components.
  • For the entire period 1990-1996, defense outlays
    in current (nominal) year dollars grew 11.4 and
    non-defense outlays 34.
  • Real growth in defense outlays was 25.5 and the
    price component was 19.
  • Real growth in non-defense outlays was 13 and
    the price component 18.6.

3

Exhibit 1.
4
Growth rate (average annual rate of growth) for
defense and non-defense outlays in current year
dollars, can be found using the following formula
  • R (Y/X) (1/N) 1
  • where
  • R the growth rate,
  • Y the end value,
  • X the beginning value, and
  • N the number of periods of growth.

5
Solution
  • Therefore the nominal growth rate for defense
    outlays is
  • Rnominal (266.0/300.1)(1/6) 1
  • .8866371211/6 1 -.02 or -2.0
  • The real rate is
  • R real (242/325)1/6 1 -. 048 or 4.8
  • Subtracting the real rate from the nominal rate
    yields the rate of inflation
  • -. 048 (- .02) .028

6
Solution (cont.)
  • The nominal growth rate for non-defense outlays
    is
  • R nominal (268.4/200.3)(1/6) 1
  • 1.04996-1 .05 or 5.0
  • The real rate is
  • R real (244/216)1/6 1 .02 or 2
  • Subtracting the real rate from the nominal rate
    yields the rate of inflation
  • .05 - .02 .03

7
Question 2-b
  • What was the real dollar (1992100) change in
    defense outlays from 1990 to 1996?
  • Convert the base to 1996100 and recalculate that
    increase.
  • Which of the two base years is more correct?
  • Compute and compare the real percentage increases
    using the two different base years

8
Answer
  • The real dollar change in defense outlays from
    1990 to 1996 was 25.5, calculated with 1992 as
    a base year.
  • Exhibit 2 shows calculations for the real dollar
    change between 1990 if 1996 is taken as a base
    year.
  • This yields the identical real dollar decrease of
    25.5.

9
Exhibit 2.
10
Question 2-c
  • Suppose prices are expected to change between
    1996 and 2000 at the same rate they did between
    1990 and 1996.
  • What level of defense and non-defense outlays
    would leave real purchasing power the same in
    2000 as in 1996?
  • D 266 (1 .028)4 297 in year 2000
  • ND 268.4 (1 .03)4 302 in year 2000
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com