Title: Welcome to the
1- Welcome to the
- CCEB Introductory Brief
2CCEB Strategic Intent
- To enhance C4 interoperability and capability for
the defence forces of its member nations and to
provide leadership and influence across the wider
C4 community
3- To achieve its purpose the CCEB will, through a
jargon-free approach - Be user focused
- Collaborate and build trust amongst key
stakeholders - Focus on Interoperability, sharing experience and
knowledge - Share national level purposes, including
experiences to the benefit of other CCEB nations,
this will include data and lessons learned - Define internal benefits to the CCEB and how the
CCEB can influence final output - Consider strategic, operational and tactical C4
requirements with direct access to secure,
accurate information for planning and decision
making - Carefully plan, prioritise and allocate available
resources to meet tasks - Review outcomes to assess value added
- Raise awareness of CCEB activities
4CCEB Lines of Effort
5CCEB GOALS STRATEGIES
6(No Transcript)
7CCEB Organization
8Personnel
as at August 2008
PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE GROUP
WASHINGTON STAFF
RADM Peter Jones
Mr. Ewart Challis
LTCOL Sheldon Kidd
MGen Glynne Hines
MAJ Shawn MacArthur
Mr Bill Brittain
Mr Peter Thomas
SQNLDR Paul Drysdale
LTCOL Noel Rings
CAPT Guy Brocklebank (Chair)
AVM Carl Dixon (Chair)
Wg Cdr Tim Neal-Hopes
LTCOL Steve Tucker (Chair)
BG Michael Basla
CAPT John Dziminowicz
Lt Cdr, RN John Stott
9Relationships with other Organisations
NATO
CFBL Net
CWID
MNE
NC3B
ACP WG
MIC
ACT
MIP
NOS WG
MNLOE
DSWG
MWAN TF
NET MIWG
MIT
CPO (G5E)
CCEB
ACP Users 110
Security WG
IAWG
ICCWG
FPDA
MULTI-FORA
CCIB
MSAB
ABCA
ASIC
A-Z NC4
TTCP
QLF
10www.jcs.mil/j6/cceb/acps
11Common Definitions
- National Domain - for example SIPRNET
- Internal sharing of information using the
nationally provided and managed network
infrastructure, applications and services. - Allied Domain - for example Griffin
- Bilateral or MN domains permanently
interconnecting national domains. - Do not need a specific coalition operation to be
formed - Enable a permanent and protected environment for
the sharing of classified or sensitive
information. - Coalition Domain - for example CENTRIXS
- Use (often stand-alone) networks and applications
between coalition partners. - A separate domain may be created for each
operation or for a specific purpose.
12Common Definitions contd
- Tier 1 Capabilities
- Those with Boundary Protection Services (Guards)
for each application - Interconnected national systems/domains via
nationally controlled and accredited guards - Tier 2 Capabilities
- Do not require Boundary Protection Services
- Not connected to national systems/domains
- Require additional separate infrastructure
(terminals/workstations etc)
13Griffin
- Tier 1 networking initiative
- Griffin is the name given to the framework that
enables the exchange of information between
classified national domains of participating
nations. - Griffin provides users with a permanent, managed
and resourced capability that enables the
exchange of up to and including Secret
information. - Services on Griffin currently limited to email
plus attachments (specified list only) and basic
web services
14CDAWG
- CDAWG Focus will be on
- the adoption of an Architectural Approach to the
development of future C4 capabilities - Development of a consolidated Multi-National
Capability Development Plan (based on national
plans) - Focussed Capability Development Teams will
develop plans for the national delivery of
capability, based on detailed user requirements
15Griffin Architecture
- As-Is and To-Be architecture views are being
developed that will - Contain high level Operational, System and
Technical views that documents the agreed
multi-national solution or implementation - Detailed lower level views will be maintained by
individual nations (national implementation) - Capability Development Teams will be responsible
for developing the lower level views and feeding
back that back into the As-Is architecture view
set
BACK
16CCEB Capability Development
- The Multi-national Capability Development Plan
will - Reflect individual national development and
implementation plans - Identify National milestones, resources,
timelines, and high level requirements - Enable alignment of national programs to deliver
capabilities - Capability development activities need not
require all five nations to implement agreed
solutions - Three phase model for the development of C4
capabilities - Capability Initiation
- Capability Development
- Capability Implementation
17Capability Initiation
User High Level User Requirement defined
EG - Direction to CDAWG develop a C4 capability
- CDAWG Relevant SME Refines Capability
Definition - Detailed Capability definition based on High
Level User Requirements - Evaluates CCEB Resources reqd for Capability
Definition phase to define implementation
options - Skills sets, milestones, etc
- Identifies High level timelines for delivery
- Develops High Level AS-IS and TO-BE
Architectural views
Capability Initiation Phase
EG - Endorse proposal for development of
implementation options
DP
Capability Definition Phase
18Capability Development
Capability Definition Phase
CDAWG or Tiger Team - Scope the art of the
possible to develop implementation options
Capability Development Phase
- CDAWG validate implementation strategies
- against User Requirement/MCDP/architecture
- Rank strategies for EG endorsement
DP
EG endorse Preferred Implementation Strategy
CDAWG Refines Implementation Plan for
Capability Development Team User Acceptance
criteria
Tiger Team - Develops Multi-national agreed
solution, Capability Delivery Plan, cost and
resources estimates, schedules and milestones
DP
CCEB Principals Approval to implement agreed
solution
Capability Implementation Phase
19Capability Delivery
Capability Implementation Phase
DP
CCEB Principals Approval
Nations Implement/Build against Agreed Solution
Requirements
Capability Delivery Phase
CDWG Coordinate User acceptance
DP
User Acceptance of delivered capability
CPO (GSM) Manage and Maintain
BACK
20GSM
- Coalition Program Office (CPO) focus was on the
development of capability as well as in service
management of Griffin services through its close
association with the CWAN WG - Griffin in Service Management GSM WG has been
stood up to provide - In-Service Management of Griffin Services and
Infrastructure, - Commissioning of new services, and
- Development of In-service Mgmt Tools
21SWG
- Following publication of STF report EG changed
the name of the FPWG to Spectrum WG to reflect a
wider responsibility for issues and policies
relating to the management of not just frequency
but spectrum in the coalition environment. - STF have produced a first draft campaign plan
for EG approval that proritises the
recommendations from the STF report. - EG have directed that STF concentrate on the
following areas in priority order - Implement a Common Data Exchange Format
- Develop a Coalition Spectrum Architecture
- Spectrum Management for Operations and
- Acquisition Process.
22CCEB Meeting Schedule
23Perm-Sec contact details john-stott_at_js.pentagon.m
il CCEB Public web-site www.jcs.mil/j6/cceb