The Why - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The Why

Description:

Eclipses (10s min days) Accretion disks (~ms years) Transients (X-ray novae) ... Distributed as 2 with 2 degrees of freedom (d.o.f.) for the Leahy normalization ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: zavenarz
Category:
Tags:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Why


1
The Why How of X-Ray Timing
  • Tod Strohmayer
  • (NASA-GSFC)
  • with thanks to Z. Arzoumanian, C. Markwardt
  • Why should I be interested?
  • What are the methods and tools?
  • What should I do?

2
Typical Sources of X-Ray Variability
  • Isolated pulsars (ms10 s)
  • X-ray binary systems
  • Accreting pulsars (ms10s s)
  • Eclipses (10s mindays)
  • Accretion disks (msyears)
  • Transients (X-ray novae)
  • Flaring stars X-ray bursters
  • Magnetars
  • Probably not supernova remnants, clusters, or the
    ISM
  • But there could be variable serendipitous sources
    in the field, especially in Chandra and XMM
    observations

In short, compact objects ( super-massive black
holes?) are, in general, intrinsically variable.
3
What can Timing Tell Us? (or, why should I be
interested?)
credit for magnetar image R. Mallozzi, UAH, MSFC
credit for herx1 image Stelzer et al. 1999
credit for scox1 image Van der Klis et al. 1997
credit for frame-dragging image J. Bergeron, Sky
Telescope
  • Timing gt characteristic timescales PHYSICS
  • Timing measurements can be extremely precise!!
  • Binary orbits
  • orbital period
  • sizes of emission regions and occulting objects
  • orbital evolution
  • Accretion phenomena
  • broadband variability
  • quasiperiodic oscillations (QPOs)
  • bursts superbursts
  • Energy dependent delays (phase lags)

4
What can Timing Tell Us? (cont)
credit for magnetar image R. Mallozzi, UAH, MSFC
credit for herx1 image Stelzer et al. 1999
credit for scox1 image Van der Klis et al. 1997
credit for frame-dragging image J. Bergeron, Sky
Telescope
  • Rotation of stellar bodies
  • pulsation periods
  • stability of rotation
  • torques acting on system

The X-ray sky is highly variable, on many
timescales! RXTE/PCA monitoring of the Galactic
center region. Thanks to Craig Markwardt.
5
Example Accreting ms Pulsars, orbits, phase lags
credit for magnetar image R. Mallozzi, UAH, MSFC
credit for herx1 image Stelzer et al. 1999
credit for scox1 image Van der Klis et al. 1997
credit for frame-dragging image J. Bergeron, Sky
Telescope
XTE J1751-305 accreting ms pulsar.
6
Example Burst Oscillations
  • Expanding layer slows down relative to bulk of
    the star.
  • Change in spin frequency crudely consistent with
    expected height increase, but perhaps not for
    most extreme variations.
  • X-ray burst expands surface layers by 30 meters.

Frequency (Hz)
Oscillation frequency
4U 1702-429
Time
7
Example ms QPOs from Neutron Star Binaries
Sco X-1
4U 1728-34
Excluded
  • Sub-ms oscillations seen from gt 20 NS binaries.
  • kHz QPO maximum frequency constrains NS equations
    of state

8
Example Magnetar QPOs
  • A sequence of frequencies was detected 28, 53.5,
    and 155 Hz!
  • Amplitudes in the 7 11 range.
  • 4 frequencies in SGR 190014, a sequence of
    toroidal modes?

9
Rotational modulation Pulsars
Crab pulsar
10
Questions that timing analysis should address
  • Does the X-ray intensity vary with time?
  • On what timescales?
  • Periodic or aperiodic? What frequency?
  • How coherent? (Q-value)
  • Amplitude of variability
  • (Fractional) RMS?
  • Any variation with time of these parameters?
  • Can the variability be modeled?
  • Any correlated changes in spectral properties or
    emissions at other wavelengths?

11
Basics
A light curve (for each source in the FOV) is a
good first step
  • Sampling interval ?t and frequency fsamp 1/?t
  • Nyquist frequency,
  • fNyq 1/2 fsamp,
  • is the highest signal frequency that can be
    accurately recovered
  • Basic variability measure, variance ?2 ltx2gt
    ltxgt2
  • ? ? Root Mean Square

12
(No Transcript)
13
Fourier Power Spectral Analysis
Answers the question how is the variability of a
source distributed in frequency (on what
timescales is the source variability)?
  • Long-timescale variations appear in low-frequency
    spectral bins, short-timescale variations in
    high-frequency bins
  • If time-domain signal varies with non-constant
    frequency, spectral response is smeared over
    several bins

14
Types of Variability, QPOs
  • A quasiperiodic oscillation is a sloppy
    oscillationcan be due to
  • intrinsic frequency variations
  • finite lifetime
  • amplitude modulation
  • Q-value fo /?f

2
15
Fourier Transform FFT
  • Given a light curve x with N samples, Fourier
    coefficients are
  • aj ?k xk exp(2pijk/N), j N/2,,0,N/21,
  • usually computed with a Fast Fourier Transform
    (FFT) algorithm, e.g., with the powspec tool, or
    the IDL fft(x) function.
  • Power density spectrum (PDS)
  • Pj 2/Nph aj2
  • Leahy normalization
  • Use Pj/ltCRgt (fractional RMS normalization) to
    plot (rms/mean)2 Hz1, often displayed and
    rebinned in a log-log plot.

16
Estimating Variability from observations
  • Find area A under curve in power spectrum,
  • A ? P d? ?j Pj ??,
  • where Pj are the PDS values, and ?? 1/T is
    the Nyquist spacing.
  • Fractional RMS isr ( A / ltCRgt)1/2
  • For coherent pulsations,
  • fp (2(P-2)/ltCRgt)1/2is the pulsed fraction,
    i.e., (peakmean)/mean

17
Estimating Variability for Proposals
To estimate amplitude of variations, or exposure
time, for a desired significance level
  • Broadband noise
  • r2 2n? v ??/Iv T
  • where r RMS fraction n?number of sigma
    of statistical significance demanded ??
    frequency bandwidth (e.g., width of QPO) I
    count rate T exposure time
  • Coherent pulsations
  • fp 4 n? /I T
  • Example
  • X-ray binary, 010 Hz, 3? detection, 5 ct/s
    source, 10 ks exposure
  • ? 3.8 threshold RMS

18
Power Spectrum Statistics
  • Any form of noise will contribute to the PDS,
    including Poisson (counting) noise
  • Distributed as ?2 with 2 degrees of freedom
    (d.o.f.) for the Leahy normalization
  • GoodHypothesis testing used in, e.g.,
    spectroscopy also works for a PDS
  • Bad mean value is 2, variance is 4!? Typical
    noise measure-ment is 22
  • Adding more lightcurve points wont help makes
    more finely spaced frequencies

19
Statistics Solutions
  • Average adjacent frequency bins
  • Divide up data into segments, make power spectra,
    average them (essentially the same thing)
  • Averaging M bins together results in noise
    distributed as ?2/M with 2M d.o.f.? for
    hypothesis testing, still chi-squared, but with
    more d.o.f.
  • However, in detecting a source, you examine many
    Fourier bins, perhaps all of them. Thus, the
    significance must be reduced by the number of
    trials. Confidence is
  • C 1 Nbins? Prob(MPj,2M),
  • where Nbins is the number of PDS bins (i.e.,
    trials), and Prob(?2,?) is the hypothesis test.

20
Power Spectrum Statistics Averaging
  • Any form of noise will contribute to the PDS,
    including Poisson (counting) noise. Averaging
    reduces the variance.
  • Running average of 38 individual PDSs from
    independent X-ray bursts from EXO 0748-676.
  • Distributed as ?2 with 2Nin degrees of freedom,
    where Nin is the number of independent frequency
    bins averaged.
  • This is the expected distribution, the true noise
    distribution could be different

21
Statistics Solutions
  • However, in detecting a source, you examine many
    Fourier bins, perhaps all of them. Thus, the
    significance must be reduced by the number of
    trials. Confidence is
  • C 1 Nbins? Prob(MPj,2M),
  • where Nbins is the number of PDS bins (i.e.,
    trials), and Prob(?2,?) is the hypothesis test,
    based on the number of bins averaged in your PDS.

Example from EXO 0748-676, RXTE data. Noise
power distribution estimated by fitting to
observed histogram.
22
Tips
  • Pulsar (coherent pulsation) searches are most
    sensitive when no rebinning is done, ie., you
    want the maximum frequency resolution (in
    principle).
  • QPO searches need to be done with multiple
    rebinning scales. In general, you are most
    sensitive to a signal when your frequency
    resolution matches (approximately) the frequency
    width of the signal.
  • Beware of signals introduced by
  • instrument, e.g., CCD read time
  • dead time
  • orbit of spacecraft
  • rotation period of Earth (and harmonics)

23
What To Do
  • Step 1. Create light curves for each source in
    your field of view ? inspect for features, e.g.,
    eclipses. Usually, this is enough to know whether
    to proceed with more detailed analysis, but you
    cant always see variability by eye!
  • Step 2. Power spectrum. Run powspec or equivalent
    and search for peaks. A good starting point,
    e.g., for RXTE, is to use FFT lengths of 500 s.

24
SAX J1808 The First Accreting Millisecond Pulsar
Lightcurve
Residuals
PDS
25
Step 3. Pulsar or eclipses found?
Refine timing analysis to boost signal-to-noise.
  • Barycenter the data corrects to arrival times at
    solar systems center of mass (tools
    fxbary/axbary)
  • Refined timing
  • Epoch folding (efold)
  • Rayleigh statistic (Z 2)
  • Arrival time analysis (Princeton TEMPO?)
  • Hint best to do timing analysis (e.g., epoch
    folding especially) on segments of data if they
    span a long time baseline, rather than all at
    once.

26
Step 3. Broadband feature(s) found?
Refined analysis best done interactively (IDL?
MatLab?).
  • Plot PDS
  • Use ?2 hypothesis testing to derive significance
    of features
  • Rebin PDS as necessary to optimize significance
  • If detected with good significance, fit to
    simple-to-integrate model(s), e.g., gaussian or
    broken power-law, lorentzians.
  • Compute RMS
  • Is the variability time dependent, energy
    dependent?

27
Rebinning to find a QPO 4U172834
  • To detect a weak QPO buried in a noisy spectrum,
    finding the right frequency resolution is
    essential!
  • It is important to have an idea of the kind of
    signals (strength, width) you are looking for.

28
Suggested Reading
  • van der Klis, M. 1989, Fourier Techniques in
    X-ray Timing, in Timing Neutron Stars, NATO ASI
    282, Ögelman van den Heuvel eds., Kluwer
  • Press et al., Numerical Recipes
  • power spectrum basics
  • Lomb-Scargle periodogram
  • Leahy et al. 1983, ApJ 266, 160
  • FFTs power spectra statistics pulsars
  • Leahy et al. 1983, ApJ 272, 256
  • epoch folding Z2
  • Vaughan et al. 1994, ApJ 435, 362
  • noise statistics
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com