DEVIANCE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

DEVIANCE

Description:

Spreading of this culture due to travel and media. 1970s punk Speed = cheap for the proletariat, rebels against the establishment ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:83
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: hopeliv
Category:
Tags: deviance

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DEVIANCE


1
DEVIANCE
  • DRUGS

2
HISTORY
  • Intoxicants are part of a whole that consists of
    a particular type of music, life style and
    clothing as well as attitudes and ideologies.
    Viewed from a wider perspective intoxicants
    symbolize societal structures - they can be part
    of youth rebellion against adults authority or
    of a need to differentiate from other youth
    groups.

3
CHRONOLOGY
  • 1920s dope girls
  • Emphasis on women uncontainable class
  • Why discourse GILBERT -
  • patrelineal succession ,
  • women full citizenship.
  • Demonology of dope girls due to profound social
    anxieties
  • 1950s and 1960s drugs associated with youth
    culture cannabis, LSD, Acid empire big money
    (New York and San Francisco)
  • Spreading of this culture due to travel and
    media.
  • 1970s punk Speed cheap for the proletariat,
    rebels against the establishment

4
  • 1980s rise in heroin use and an association with
    young working class (underclass) people
    TRAINSPOTTING
  • Rise of Crack Cocaine in USA associated with
    young black men.
  • Cocaine and the yuppie culture.
  • Late 1980s and 1990s Dance Culture (Also Known as
    the Second Drug Wave)
  • Ecstasy
  • Drug culture prevalent in Great Britain, Germany
    Holland and Italy.
  • MORAL PANICS Within each time period the media
    have contributed to moral panics that have
    gripped the publics imagination.

5
NORMALISATION
  • Has there been a Normalisation of drug use?
  • Argument for Normalisation.
  • Aldridge (1999) Self Report Studies.
  • 6/10 under 16 have tried an illicit drug
  • 1.2 1.8 million 15-19 have experienced drugs
    (Post 1996)
  • Therefore normative effect-
  • No longer correlate drugs with race, class,
    gender, crime and delinquency

6
  • Parker (1998) G. Manchester and Merseyside from
    1991 till 1995 14-18yrs
  • Findings- Exposure and experimentation rises
    with age.
  • 6/10 had tried at least one drug by the age of
    18.
  • For many young people taking drugs has become the
    norm and the prediction that over the next few
    years, and certainly in urban areas, non drug
    using adolescents will be a minority group. In
    one sense they will be the deviants (PARKER
    199526)

7
Attitudes- Four Pathway Groups
  • Abstainers
  • Ex triers
  • Transition
  • Current users
  • Post Modern society and leisure as consumption.

8
  • Therefore the normality of drug use amongst the
    young can be attributed to a number of areas-
  • 1 Availability
  • 2 Given and shared in many social settings
  • 3 Therefore young people make drug decisions
    which make them drug wise
  • 4 Cultural belief5 Risk Society (Calculated risk)
  • 6 Cannabis most common (safe and cost
    effective)
  • 7 Reluctant social acceptance (Co existence and
    accommodation)

9
  • 8 Post modernity emphasis on consumption,
    fracturing of morality and reshaping of class and
    gender relationships.
  • Nowadays ecstasy is taken by people of various
    backgrounds, diverse sexual orientations and a
    wide range of educational backgrounds
  • (Richard S Cohen (1998)The Love Drug)
  • As soon as people realize that the majority of
    people in this country take drugs, then the
    better off we will all beDrugs is like getting
    up and having a cup of tea in the morning ( Noel
    Gallagher NME 29th January 1997)

10
  • Against Normalisation thesis.
  • Michael Shiner and Tim Newburn(1999)
  • Three questions need to be answered
  • 1 How common is illicit drug use?
  • 2 How have the levels of illicit drug use changed
    over time?
  • 3 What are peoples attitude to illicit drug use?

11
  • Answer 1
  • Although illicit drug use may be more prevalent
    amongst the young adolescent users do not
    outnumber non users. YLS indicates that 64 of
    14-25year olds have never used an illicit drug in
    their lives (Graham and Bowling 1995)
  • Data to support the normalization thesis is
    flawed
  • Failure to distinguish between current and ex
    users
  • (Current use of drugs is based on behaviour
    during the previous year)
  • Despite the status of cannabis being the nations
    favorite drug (see normalization thesis above)
    the BCS (1994) showed that less than a third of
    all 16-19 year olds are current cannabis users.
    Also-
  • 3/100 16-24 have ever used cocaine
  • 1/100 heroin
  • 1/200 Crack

12
  • Answer 2
  • Changing patterns of drug use show a fairly
    steady increase since 1950s There is no RADICAL
    break. Therefore there has been a period of
    evolution rather than radical fundamental
    structural shift as those who champion the
    normalization thesis would suggests

13
  • Answer 3
  • Young peoples attitudes
  • ISR 1996 drugs are ordered into a hierarchy of
    disapproval
  • Restrictive attitudes are based upon concerns
    around-
  • Health
  • Finance
  • Functioning in everyday life
  • General criminality
  • (Shiner and Newburn 1996)
  • Also Peer Selection (Coggans and McKellar 1994)

14
How should society and the government deal with
the drug phenomena?
  • Change/ Libertarians- those who advocate
    decriminalization
  • Criminalizing normally law abiding citizens.
  • Crime without a victim
  • why should the government tell society what to
    do?
  • Rowntree these people are not losers just part
    of the consumer lifestyle
  • decriminalizing could regulate purity
  • violent crime and illegal profit would disappear

15
  • Anti Change those who argue that changes in the
    structure of society are needed
  • Focus on inner city users not recreational
  • Geoff Pearson (1997) legalization misses the
    point of economic deprivation
  • Elliot Currie (1993) urban and family decline
  • Mike Davies (1990)- LA drugs gangs
    restructuring of local and global economies
  • Therefore legalization would produce more drug
    misuse, accelerate urban decline

16
Labour Government Drug Strategies
  • 1 To stifle availability of drugs on our
    streets
  • 2 To help young people resist drug misuse , to
    achieve their full potential in society
  • 3 To enable people with drugs problems to
    overcome them and lead healthy and crime free
    lives
  • 4 To protect our communities from drug related
    anti social and criminal behviour
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com