Title: Lund University Libraries Head Office
1From Print to(wards) Electronic - the Delicate
Balance between Centralization and
Decentralization
Lund University LibrariesHead Office
XXV. Bibliothekstagung der Max-Planck-Institute,
Dresden, May, 2002 Lars Björnshauge, Director of
Libraries, Lund University, Sweden
2Outline of presentation
- Past experiences Print/electronic/hybrid
library services - Current activities
- Electronic information resources
advantages/problems - Managing electronic library services in a
decentralized organisation - Some recommendations
3Background
- 1983 Masters degree public administration,
Roskilde Univ., Denmark - 1986-1992 Professor Royal Danish School of
Librarianship, Copenhagen, Denmark - 1992-2000 Management positions, Technical
Knowledge Center of Denmark, Technical University
of Denmark - 2001- Director of Libraries, Lund University,
Sweden
4Technical University of Denmark
- Monofaculty institution science engineering
- 7000 students
- 1000 researchers/teachers
- 1 main library (centrally funded) and 20 minor
departemental libraries (funded by departments)
5Developing electronic library services
Technical University of Denmark
- 1996 first electronic license agreement
- 1998 first consortia agreements
- 1999
- merging departemental and central library
subscriptions, - massive cancellations of print,
- dramatic increase in content,
- reduced handling costs,
- massive education training of staff,
- staff reductions 15,
- development of integrated user interfaces
6Lund University
- Founded 1668
- Largest in Scandinavia
- 30.000 students
- 3.200 doctoral students
- 4.000 researchers teachers
7Lund University
- 7 faculties (technology, science, law, performing
arts, humanities theology, medicine, economy
social sciences, ) - 10 independent research centers
- Campus in Lund, Malmö Helsingborg
8Lund University
- Very decentralized organization
- Decision making
- Funding virtually all funding direct allocated
to faculties, departments and research centers - Decision making and funding for infrastructural
resources is highly political!
9Lund University Libraries organizational
structure
- Untill year 2000
- 2 main university libraries
- 60 libraries (faculty, departemental etc.)
- No coordination of subscriptions
- From 2001
- Downsizing the main libraries
- Development of faculty and departemental
libraries - Coordination Library Head Office
10Problems and challenges
- Old organization
- Lack of sensitivity as to key demands
- Lack of development
- Dispute as to funding
- No coordination of subscriptions/licenses
- New organization
- Coordinated development of faculty libraries
- Development of the electronic library
- Decentralization and Centralization
11Lund University Library Structure After
Reorganisation
Library Board
Library Council
Library Head Office Licensing Electronic
Library IT maint. dev. OPAC Support for
restructuring
Medical Faculty
Performing Arts Faculty
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Faculty of Law
Science Faculty
L
L
L
L
Electronic resources
L
L
University Library Legal deposit Old collections
Engineering Faculty
LRC
Social Sciences Faculty
Humanities Theology Faculty
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
12The Primary challenge
- Is not to build the electronic library
- But
- To integrate electronic resources and print
collections the hybrid library - Not
- Print or electronic
- But
- Print and electronic
13Electronic journals - advantages
- 24/7 access
- Remote access
- Interlinking
- Usage statistics
- When electronic only Reduced handling costs
14Electronic journals - problems
- Different content
- Quality images, charts etc.
- Control of delivery
- Problems with access
- New work flows
- Usage statistics
15Electronic journals additional
problems/advantages
- Pricing models
- based on value of print holdings
- Uncontrollabels
- Deep Discount Pricing
- Consortia Licensing more content
- Back Files
16More problems/advantages
- Bundled subscriptions activation of electronic
access - Archiving
- Presentation
- How to make the most of the advantages and
minimize the problems??
17Constructing the electronic library
- The components
- Content
- Interfaces
- Staff
- Education training
- Management
18The Content
- Databases (A i services
- Electronic journals
- Print collections (OPAC)
- Open archives, local databases etc.
- Document delivery services
19Interfaces (integration)
- Linking content together into integrated library
services - Tools
- Metasearch applications
- Open URL
- Z-gateways
- MyLibrary ELIN_at_Lund
20Management
- Getting the grip on subscriptions and licenses
- Negotiating with publishers/vendors
- Preparing for decision making
- Follow up/evaluating
- Costs/Savings
- Usage statistics
21Building the electronic library the case of
Lund University Libraries
- When we started
- No overview on subscriptions
- No overview on spending/costs
- No integration of print collections (OPAC),
databases/electronic journals - Manual maintained lists of databases and
electronic journals
22The first steps
- Organizing - Setting up the team
- Getting the overview
- Calculating costs
- Select -Negotiate/renew/cancel
- Communicating the need for centralization of
e-media decision making - Preparing for centralization
- Developing interfaces
23Organizing
- Getting the commitment from the funding body
- Setting up the committee of librarians
- Setting up the committee of end user
representatives (faculty staff, doctoral students)
24Getting the overview
- Databases
- Existing subscriptions
- Which, Who pays, How much
- Investigating the demand for new subscriptions
- Calculating costs
- Evaluating
25Getting the overview
- Journals
- Designing the subscription database
- Gather subscription information
- Calculate costs
- Depp Discount Pricing
- Uncontrollabels
26Why centralize subscriptions?
- More content available
- More consistent access
- Better position vis-a-vis agents/publishers
- Better pricing - DDP
- Better value for money
- Reduced administration
27Preparing for centralization of subscriptions
- Highlight the current problems
- Highlight the future benefits
- Get the support from the libraries
- Get commitment from the management
28The benefits
- Reduced handling storing costs
- More content
- Easier access
- Better pricing even on print!
- ILL decreasing!?
- Problem benefits savings are often hard to
cash in or invisible - How to cash in savings in work load in small
libraries? - Faster easier access for end users?
29Electronic information
- Decentralization available on the desktop, 24/7
access, remote access - Centralization negotiating, administration,
financial management, usage statistics, technical
development and operation - Cooperation selection, education training
30Integration of print and electronic services
- Developing and implementing interfaces
- Reduce the number of sites to consult
- Searching different sources in one go
- Not direct the users to the publishers sites
31Lund experiences so far!
- Difficult to get the overview
- Difficult to manage cash-flow
- Decentralization does not work properly
- Large increase in content very positive
- Education, training and marketing very important
- Interfaces very important usage boost
dramatically when adequate
32Recommendations
- Set up a central e-media management unit
- Funding
- Central or
- taxing content provision, services, technical
development operations etc. - Tasks
- Appoint/train/allocate staff
- Get the overview
- Discuss the findings and make recommendations
33Recommendations
- Appoint an e-media committee
- Establish priorities (which databases, which
journal agreements) - Renegotiate with subscriptionsagents and
publishers (e-media unit) - Review the plan for integration of library
services (interfaces etc.)
34Division of responsibilities
- The libraries
- Selection of print subscriptions, claims,
education training, - E-media committee
- Decisions as to databases, electronic license
agreements, distribution of costs, priorities as
to technical development (interfaces etc.) - The E-media management unit
- Negotiating (agent/publishers), evaluation
(statistics), financial management, technical
dev. operat., help-desk,