Geoff Clark Damein Delrie Jemita Gipson Josh Haber

1
Geoff Clark Damein Delrie Jemita Gipson Josh
Haber
DeShaun Rogers LaTanya Stipe Cassandra Watson
2
OVERVIEW

• Revisions to Systems Request
• Feasibility Analysis
• Technical
• Economic
• Organizational
• Risk Assessment
• Risk Reduction
• Updates to Work Plan and Gantt Chart

3
SYSTEMS REQUEST

• Updates

4
FEASIBILITY ANALYSISTechnical (Moderate)

• Familiarity with the Business Processes 
  (Moderate)
• Tech Solutions (Moderate)
• The team members of Tech Solutions are familiar
  with the various salons around Ruston.
• One of our members are closely related to someone
  whos familiar with the existing system at
  Elandas Hair Gallery.
• Elandas Hair Gallery (High)
• Elanda is experienced with the existing system
  and business processes..
• Elanda is the only person who deals with the
  existing system.

5
FEASIBILITY ANALYSISTechnical (Moderate)

• Familiarity with Technology (Moderate)
• Tech Solutions (High)
• As a whole, our members have gain considerable
  understanding of the current issues in the world
  of Information Technology through experiences in
  the Computer Information System curriculum and
  various work experiences.
• Elandas Hair Gallery (Low)
• Elanda has little knowledge of computers.

6
FEASIBILITY ANALYSISEconomic (Moderate)

• Development Costs
• Server 499.00
• Cat 5e cable 10.95
• Dell Printer 99.00
• Printer Cable 24.95
• Development Labor 25,000.00
• Total Developmental Costs 25,633.90

7
FEASIBILITY ANALYSISEconomic (Moderate)

• Annual Operating Costs
• Internet Service 599.40
• Printer Ink 64.99
• Paper 29.95
• Total Annual Operating Costs 694.34

8
FEASIBILITY ANALYSISEconomic (Moderate)

• Total Benefits
• Return On Investment 839
• Net Present Value 211,135.00

9
FEASIBILITY ANALYSISOrganizational (High)

• Project Champion
• Elanda, Owner of Elandas Hair Gallery
• Senior Management
• Elanda is owner and supervisor of her hair
  salon.  She is very excited about the
  implementation of the new web scheduling and
  inventory management system.

10
FEASIBILITY ANALYSISOrganizational (High)

• Users
• The users of Elandas Appointment system would be
  any potential customer that she might have,
  including the current ones who feel this would be
  a great way to schedule hair appointments. 
• The hair techs at Elandas would also be using
  the system for tracking appointments and
  scheduling people who called in. 
• Elanda believes the customers would be the most
  important users because her system would be the
  first web based system  in this area and also
  give her a new presence in the web market.

11
FEASIBILITY ANALYSISOrganizational (High)

• Stakeholders
• Customers would benefit from this system because
  they would not have to wait as long as before. 
  They know that when they schedule an appointment,
  the hair tech will be ready to take care of
  them.  Prior to this, if someone called in, the
  old paper method could get lost and appointments
  were overlapping. 
• Also the system will be able to track customers
  and their habits so they would have the ability
  to offer incentives or promotions based on their
  clients history.

12
Cost-Benefit Analysis

• Version 1.0

13
(No Transcript)
14
Risk Assessment

• Version 1.0

15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
Risk Reduction

• Size Risk (Low)
• Current Risk
• The project already has low risk. The low
  implementation time, lack of other systems and
  departments involved, moderate amount of
  development time, and the one vendor involved has
  kept risk at a minimum.Cumulative Risk Score
  21Possible Risk Score 52 Risk Attributed to
  Size 12.43
• Adjustments
• None.

21
Risk Reduction

• Technology Risk (Moderate)
• Current Risk
• Technology risk is at a moderate level, but can
  be reduced by training employees on the
  information system. Employees also have limited
  experience with the new computer and server
  hardware.Cumulative Risk Score 30Possible
  Risk Score 63 Risk Attributed to Technology
  17.75

22
Risk Reduction

• Technology Risk (Moderate)
• Adjustments
• Expose employees to the new hardware and system
  to be implemented so that they will know what to
  expect once implementation occurs.Risk After
  Adjustments 21 Possible Risk Score 63 Risk
  Attributed to Technology After Adjustments 12.43

23
Risk Reduction

• Structured Risk (Moderate)
• Current Risk
• The project has a moderate structure risk. The
  primary high risk factor would be the lack of
  joint ISD-customer team. On the contrary,
  management is already extremely enthusiastic
  about the project.Cumulative Risk Score 33
  Possible Risk Score 54 Risk Attributed to
  Structure 19.53

24
Risk Reduction

• Structured Risk (Moderate)
• Adjustments
• Having a part-time customer representative to
  assist the team with the implementation of the
  system would decrease the structured risk.Risk
  After Adjustments 27 Possible Risk Score 54
  Risk Attributed to Technology After Adjustments
  15.98

25
WORK PLAN

• Updates

26
(No Transcript)
27
GANTT CHART

• Updates

28
(No Transcript)
29
CONCLUSION

• Revisions to Systems Request
• Feasibility Analysis
• Technical
• Economic
• Organizational
• Risk Assessment
• Risk Reduction
• Updates to Work Plan and Gantt Chart
• Questions?