Electoral Ward Map

1
CDBG-HOME Spending Pattern (2000-2008)

• Geographic Distribution of Program Spending (by
  Ward)
• First-Home Lima
• ReNew (Housing Rehabilitation)
• Emergency Repair
• Demolition
• Streets Improvement
• Property Maintenance Enforcement Actions

Electoral Ward Map
2
CDBG-Eligible Areas

• Before 2000 Census
• 51 of population were deemed Low- to Moderate
  Income
• 60 of city land area were CDBG-Eligible

• Before Census 2000
• Population 45,549
• African-American 24
• Other 2
• White 74

3
First-Home Lima
Assistance on downpayment and closing cost to
eligible low- to moderate-income, first-time
homebuyers. Beneficiaries who remain in their
homes for 5 years can have their 3,000 loan
totally forgiven.
247 Families 1,052,354 (2000-2008) (or
4,261/family)
Average Spending, By Ward
4
ReNew (Housing Rehabs)
Direct loans at 3 interest to income-eligible
homeowners. Beneficiaries who remain in their
homes for 5 years may have 30 of the loan
forgiven.
20
5
6
14
83 Housing Units 2,102,390 (2000-2008) (or
25,330/housing unit)
10
5
Average Spending, By Ward
9
14
1st - 20 housing units 506,600 2nd - 5
housing units 126,650 3rd - 14 housing units
354,620 4th - 5 housing units 126,650 5th
- 14 housing units 354,620 6th - 9 housing
units 227,970 7th - 6 housing units
151,980 8th - 10 housing units 253,300
(Values by ward may not add up totals due to
rounding up of averages)
5
Emergency Repair
Assistance to very low-income homeowners with
repairs to their residence for health and safety
issues that contribute to an immediate hazard.
7
16
7
20
246 Housing Units 2,049,070 (2000-08) (or
8,330/housing unit)
41
9
Average Spending, By Ward 1st - 16 housing
units 133,280 2nd - 7 housing units
58,310 3rd - 20 housing units 166,600 4th
- 9 housing units 74,970 5th - 60 housing
units 499,800 6th - 86 housing units
716,380 7th - 7 housing units 58,310 8th
- 41 housing units 341,530
60
86
(Values by ward may not add up totals due to
rounding up of averages)
6
Demolition
Removal of vacant and dilapidated structures that
can not be rehabilitated, and pose health
safety hazards and blighting influences.
0
6
0
25
154 Structures 915,188 (2000-08) (or
5,943/structure)
12
3
Average Spending, By Ward 1st - 6 structures
35,658 2nd - 0 structures 0 3rd - 25
structures 148,575 4th - 3 structures
17,829 5th - 41 structures 243,663 6th - 67
structures 398,181 7th - 0 structures
0 8th - 12 structures 71,316
41
67
(Values by ward may not add up totals due to
rounding up of averages)
7
Streets Improvement
Reconstruction/resurfacing of streets in
CDBG-eligible areas.
2nd
1st
3rd
7th
33.1 miles resurfaced/reconstructed 3,661,697
(2000-08) or 110,625/mi
8th
4th
5th
6th
Miles, by Ward (not available) Average
Spending, By Ward (not available)
8
Code Enforcement (2005-06)
Responses to complaints and findings of property
maintenance code violations
556
100
13
2
216
774
5
17
4,406 inspections on 2,254 properties
664
218
15
5
1,076
852
24
Average Spending, By Ward (not available)
19
9
Code Enforcement (2006-07)
Responses to complaints and findings of property
maintenance code violations
3,898 inspections on 1,922 properties
Average Spending, By Ward (not available)
10
Code Enforcement (2007-08)
Responses to complaints and findings of property
maintenance code violations
4,625 inspections on 1,970 properties
Ave. Spending, By Ward (not available)
11
Average Spending of CDBG and HOME Funds, By Ward,
By Program, (2000-2008)
NOTE Program values by ward may not exactly add
up to totals due to rounding up of averages by
program.