The Technical Division

1
The Technical Division

• Victor Yarba
• 9 January 2006

2
Technical Division Mission

• The research, development, design, fabrication or
  procurement, and testing of accelerator and
  detector components
• Support the Accelerator Complex
• Conduct Accelerator RD
• ILC, PD, LHC, LARP
• Support Projects
• CMS Muons, LHC Accelerator Project, Pierre Auger
• Provide Lab-wide Services
• Incoming inspection, material control,
  specialized machine shop
• TD is 230 people accustomed to
• Working on technical HEP RD devices
• Responding to customer requirements
• Preparing designs to be production ready,
  including integration w/ industry
• delivering on accelerator projects for Fermilab
  and other HEP labs.

3
TD Personnel (FTE)
Oct 05 snapshot We have shifted FTEs from
support to scientific roles in the past 6 years
within the scope of the lab funding situation
TDs ability to support and track record of
performance on outside projects supports our
requests
4
FY06 TD Labor Plan (FTE)
Machine Shop (cost neutral) and LOA
ILC / 3.9GHz / RF Infrastructure now incorporated
in Project 18, Directorate fundingoutside
the Division
LHC and LARP are true outside projects
5
FY06 Cost of Labor (SWF)

• Red outside funding 8.4 of FY06 SWF
• Green Project 18 21.8

TD base SWF for FY06
6
Operating Income

• TD also handles additional MS money for
  outside projects and Accel. Division purchases
• In FY05 we handled
• 12 K of MS for CMS
• 646 K of MS for the LHC project
• 394 K of US Auger funds (US portion of
  project is 25)
• 1,020 K for Accel. Division purchases via
  Material Control Dept
• 3,085 K of MS and SWF flowed through the
  machine shops. (This organization operates on a
  charge back system such that it is intended to be
  cost neutral for the Division)
• The total MS SWF handled by the Technical
  Division in FY05 was 34,559 K
• Expect FY06 to be essentially flat based on
  guidance

7
Future of TD Efforts

• Activity FY06 FY07 and
  beyond Comments
• Run II flat flat?
  Extras will roll off
• BTEV ended
  effort shifted to LARP,PD,ILC
• LHC ends 1450
  ? 238 K of SWF in 06
• LARP growth flat
  500K SWF in 05gt1379 in 06
• HFM flat flat
  part of LARP agreement
• Auger flat flat?
  (Auger North ?)
• ILC/SCRF growth growth !
• Proton Driver growth growth !

Big Areas of growth are all in SCRF. The Division
is making substantial changes to respond to
changing priorities
8
Technical Division Openings
In background check
filled
In background check
filled
060011 EE/ME III
SRF Processing In background
check
9
Goals of FY06 TD labor Plan

• Goal 1st Priority is to provide needed
  resources to accomplish the Labs Run II goals
  (necessary repairs, spares, new devices for
  luminosity upgrades, studies related to machine
  performance)
• Goal Meet project commitments to LHC Auger
• Goal Meet ILC RD commitments to GDE and ramp
  up a serious ILC effort at FNAL
• Goal Complete critical Proton Driver RD CD1
  docs
• Goal Develop SCRF infrastructure per plan to
  GDE
• Includes SCRF materials program support for
  Peoples Fellow
• Goal HFM LARP Nb3Sn Magnet RD
• Meet LARP commitments
• Develop HFM infrastructure

Verbatim from Oct Budget review presentation
10
What isnt Accomplished with the Guidance?

• TD guidance is insufficient to provide the
  required MS to fund the 3.9 GHz module we
  promise in the DESY MOU
• Funds are inadequate for PD, ILC, and SCRF
  infrastructure given our stated goals ( more in a
  separate talk)
• Would need to cut something to maintain Dept MS.
  choices ILC, Proton Driver, SCRF infrastructure,
  or HFM. None are very attractive
• There is limited flexibility in the TD to hire
  needed experts in SCRF cavities, cavity testing,
  and high power RF

Verbatim from Oct Budget review presentation
11
Conclusion

• Can TD live with the FY06 budget guidance?
• Yes It allows TD to provide the required Run II
  labor
• Yes TD can pay the salaries of people in the
  Division working on HFM, ILC, PD, Auger, etc.
• No Dept MS budgets cannot erode away each year
  by inflation. There are fixed costs, and some
  that increase with time. We need at least an
  additional 435 K to make up for lost outside
  income. (down by 609 K) or take it from project
  MS
• No ILC and SCRF infrastructure will be a lot
  less than FNAL told GDE
• No Proton Driver will not be able to accomplish
  planned FY06 goals for CD-1
• Both programs would be starved for MS relative
  to what is needed to make real progress
• We have no flexibility to hire needed SCRF
  experts, RF power engineers, and Accelerator
  physicists.
• These RD efforts are the future of this lab

Verbatim from Oct Budget review presentation
12
TD Organization
13
Today
Department and Project Leaders will give a brief
overview of how their department supports the TD
mission, and introduce themselves
14
TD Budget Cycle and Info

• Fiscal Year is October September
• We are on the verge of getting the FY06 Budget
• This is not unusual
• Yearly Budget Cycle includes
• Directorate Budget Review in October
• Report on previous year and upcoming year
• WPAS Plan in March
• Plan for current year and 2 out years, includes
  FTE counts in certain categories
• Monthly Budget Reports
• Effort and Materials on task numbers Project
  Managers and Department Heads are expected to
  check and be accountable for the tasks w/ their
  signature authority
• A budget revision / check in May/June
• Correction of allocations in Division, also
  potential transfers across Divisions