The future of forest genetics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

The future of forest genetics

Description:

Biological raw materials augment and eventually replace petroleum to achieve sustainability ... recovery of recessive mutations; GE can create them easily ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:455
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: toby8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The future of forest genetics


1
The future of forest genetics
  • Toby Bradshaw
  • Department of Biology
  • University of Washington
  • toby_at_u.washington.edu

2
Human demand for wood and fiber is increasing
  • Population growth
  • Lumber
  • Paper
  • Fuel
  • More agricultural land needed to grow food for
    humans less land for forests and wilderness
  • Biobased economy
  • Biological raw materials augment and eventually
    replace petroleum to achieve sustainability

3
http//www.wri.org
4
The Great RestorationDavid Victor and Jesse
Ausubel
Skinhead Earth
http//phe.rockefeller.edu/restoringforests/
Pre-agricultural 6000 B.C.
1990s
Great Restoration
Non-forest, non-ag
Wild forest
Increasing the yield of industrial forests is key!
Agriculture
Industrial forest
5
The upside potential for yield
non-growing season 22
reflectance, respiration, etc. 21
net photosynthesis 1
  • A 1 increase in conversion of solar energy to
    fixed carbon will double biomass yield

non-PAR 56
6
What is a GMO?
  • Genetically Modified Organism
  • Asexual gene (DNA) transfer (genetic
    engineering/GE)
  • Unlimited gene pool
  • Research tool
  • Pharmaceuticals
  • Crops (Frankenfood)
  • Livestock?
  • Forest trees?
  • Fish?
  • Humans?

7
Gene transfer (transformation)
  • Typical traits engineered into crops
  • Herbicide resistance (e.g., Roundup Ready)
  • Insect resistance (Bt toxin)
  • Vitamin A (golden rice)
  • Fruit firmness (Flavr Savr tomato)

8
Why genetically engineer forest trees?
  • Basic research to discover how trees work, and
    which genes are responsible for the unique
    biological features of trees
  • Increase wood yield and quality by accelerating
    progress in applied tree breeding for plantation
    forests
  • Improve environmental quality by restoring
    endangered tree species (chestnut, elm) and by
    using GE trees for phytoremediation of toxic waste

9
Traits being genetically engineered in forest
trees
  • Gene traps to discover genes involved in tree
    growth and development

Photo courtesy of Andrew Groover, Institute of
Forest Genetics
10
Traits being genetically engineered in forest
trees
  • Herbicide resistance (weed control)
  • Insect resistance (leaf beetle, budworm)

Transgenic
Non-transgenic
Photos courtesy of Rick Meilan, Tree Genetic
Engineering Research Cooperative
11
Traits being genetically engineered in forest
trees
  • Lignin reduction (reduced chemical use, waste,
    and energy consumption in pulping)
  • Reproductive sterility (prevention of transgene
    escape)

12
Traits being genetically engineered in forest
trees
  • Phytoremediation (removal of toxic wastes)
  • Disease resistance (chestnut blight, Dutch elm
    disease)

13
Traits of the future
  • Growth/yield (wood, fiber, renewable energy)
  • Wood quality (strength, stiffness, straightness,
    few knots)
  • Tolerance of cold, drought, salt
  • Novel photosynthetic pathways
  • Self-pulping wood
  • Farmaceuticals
  • Industrial chemical feedstocks
  • DOMESTICATION

14
Where are we now and where will we be?
?
?
Effect of mutations
refinement
domestication
Number of mutations
15
Potential benefits of GE trees
  • Accelerates tree breeding/domestication
  • Increased plantation yield spares wilderness
  • Tolerance of harsh environments
  • Reduced use of chemical pesticides
  • Improved product quality
  • Novel products (e.g., pharmaceuticals, industrial
    raw materials)
  • Economically and environmentally sustainable wood
    production

16
Concerns about GE trees
  • Environmental risk (transgene escape, weediness,
    effects on non-target species)
  • Corporate control of forestry
  • Unnatural breaching of species barrier
  • Unethical (e.g., playing God)

17
Who opposes tree genetic engineering research?
  • Earth Liberation Front You cannot control what
    is wild.
  • Greenpeace moratorium on all field research with
    transgenic plants
  • Forest Stewardship Council denies certification
    to entities conducting field research on
    transgenic trees

18
Forest Stewardship Council
  • The use of exotic species shall be carefully
    controlled and actively monitored to avoid
    adverse ecological impacts.
  • No species should be planted on a large scale
    until local trials and/or experience have shown
    that they are ecologically well-adapted to the
    site, are not invasive, and do not have
    significant negative ecological impacts on other
    ecosystems.

19
(No Transcript)
20
From the ELF communiquè
  • "Bradshaw, the driving force in G.E. tree
    research, continues to unleash mutant genes into
    the environment that is sic certain to cause
    irreversible harm to forest ecosystems. As long
    as universities continue to pursue this reckless
    'science, they run the risk of suffering severe
    losses. Our message remains clear, we are
    determined to stop genetic engineering."

21
From the ELF website
  • There were a total of 137 illegal direct actions
    in North America in 2001 72 of those were for
    animal liberation, 51 for earth liberation, and
    14 against GMO/GE.
  • The firebombing of CUH was the single biggest
    direct action by the ELF in 2001, and the
    second largest ever.

22
From the ELF FAQ
Setting Fires With Electrical Timers - An Earth
Liberation Front Guide
  • The ELF targets have included such issues as
    deforestation (for human development of roadways,
    for luxurious living and/or recreation areas, for
    profit by selling or using trees, etc.), urban
    sprawl, genetic engineering, natural habitat and
    ecosystem destruction, the use of slave labor by
    corporations and more.

23
Effects of terrorism onscientific research
  • Attempts to suppress academic freedom and basic
    research
  • Increases costs of research
  • Drives research out of public institutions and
    into private hands
  • Diverts talented researchers into less
    controversial areas
  • May negatively impact research funding

24
US National Research Council/National Academy of
Sciences position on GE and conventional plant
breeding
  • The same physical and biological laws govern the
    response of organisms modified by modern
    molecular and cellular methods and those produced
    by classical methods.

25
Who said this?
  • The time has come rich opportunity shines
    forth for the timber extraction industry to
    shift to tree farming on already converted land.
    The cultivation of lumber and pulp should be
    conducted like the agribusiness it is, using
    high-quality, fast-growing species and strains
    for higher productivity and profit.
  • From E. O. Wilson, 2002, The Future of Life.
    Knopf, New York (p.161)

26
Issues to discuss
  • What are the trade-offs involved in the adoption
    or rejection of genetically engineered trees?
  • Does genetic engineering differ in any meaningful
    way from conventional plant breeding?

27
Genetic engineering (GE) will be required for
tree domestication
  • One cycle of conventional breeding takes a
    decade GE takes 6 months
  • Outcrossing mating system prevents recovery of
    recessive mutations GE can create them easily
  • Many vital tree functions are supported with
    duplicated genes GE can knock out all copies
    of a gene at once
  • Using genetic engineering, domestication could be
    compressed into a few decades instead of
    centuries of conventional breeding

28
The role of genetics in agriculture
Genomics and biotech
Single-cross hybrids
Double-cross hybrids
29
Potential environmental risks of GE plants
  • Non-target effects (e.g., Monarch butterfly)
  • Insects become resistant to Bt, making it useless
    for organic farmers
  • Increased use of broad-spectrum herbicides
  • Gene flow to wild relatives (e.g., superweeds)
  • Loss of biodiversity (e.g., monoculture)

30
From the ELF FAQ
  • Capitalism as a target is not easily
    identifiable due to it being an ideology rather
    than a physical object. But forms and symbols of
    capitalism can be targeted successfully the
    list is endless but could include such symbols in
    the U.S. as Mt. Rushmore, the Statue of Liberty,
    Disney, Wall Street, etc.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com