Revealing Treacherous Points for Successful LightFront Phenomenological Applications - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Revealing Treacherous Points for Successful LightFront Phenomenological Applications

Description:

Revealing Treacherous Points for Successful Light-Front Phenomenological Applications ... G.Couture and J.N.Ng, Z.Phys.C35,65(1987) E.N.Argyres et al.,NPB391,23(1993) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: physicsAd
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Revealing Treacherous Points for Successful LightFront Phenomenological Applications


1
Revealing Treacherous Points for Successful
Light-Front Phenomenological Applications
  • LC2005, Cairns, July 14, 2005

2
Motivation
  • LFD Applications to Hadron Phenomenology
  • -GPD,SSA,(JLAB,Hermes,)
  • -B Physics (Babar,Belle,BTeV,LHCB,)
  • -QGP,Quark R F (RHIC,LHC ALICE,)
  • Significance of Zero-Mode Contributions
  • -Even in J (G00 in Vector Anomaly)
  • -Angular Condition(Spin-1 Form Factors,)
  • -Equivalence to Manifestly Covariant
    Formulation

How do we find where they are?
3
Outline
  • Common Belief of Equivalence
  • - Exactly Solvable Model
  • - Heuristic Regularization Arc Contribution
  • Vector Anomaly in W Form Factors
  • - Brief History
  • - Manifestly Covariant Calculation
  • Pinning Down Which Form Factors
  • - Dependence on Formulations
  • Direct Power-Counting Method
  • Conclusions

4
Common Belief of Equivalence
5
Exactly Solvable Model of Bound-States
6
Electromagnetic Form Factor
7
Equivalent Result in LFD

Valence Nonvalence
8
Heuristic Regularizationto recover the
equivalence
9
Arc Contribution in LF-Energy Contour
10
Form Factor Results
11
Standard Model
  • Utility of Light-Front Dynamics (LFD)
  • Bottom-Up Fitness Test of Model Theories
  • B.Bakker and C.Ji, PRD71,053005(2005)

12
CP-Even Electromagnetic Form Factors of W? Gauge
Bosons
At tree level, for any q2,
13
One-loop Contributions in S.M.
W.A.Bardeen,R.Gastmans and B.Lautrup,
NPB46,319(1972) G.Couture and J.N.Ng,
Z.Phys.C35,65(1987) E.N.Argyres et
al.,NPB391,23(1993) J.Papavassiliou and
K.Philippidas,PRD48,4255(1993)
14
One-loop Contributions in S.M.
W.A.Bardeen,R.Gastmans and B.Lautrup,
NPB46,319(1972) G.Couture and J.N.Ng,
Z.Phys.C35,65(1987) E.N.Argyres et
al.,NPB391,23(1993) J.Papavassiliou and
K.Philippidas,PRD48,4255(1993)
15
One-loop Contributions in S.M.
W.A.Bardeen,R.Gastmans and B.Lautrup,
NPB46,319(1972) G.Couture and J.N.Ng,
Z.Phys.C35,65(1987) E.N.Argyres et
al.,NPB391,23(1993) J.Papavassiliou and
K.Philippidas,PRD48,4255(1993)
16
One-loop Contributions in S.M.
W.A.Bardeen,R.Gastmans and B.Lautrup,
NPB46,319(1972) G.Couture and J.N.Ng,
Z.Phys.C35,65(1987) E.N.Argyres et
al.,NPB391,23(1993) J.Papavassiliou and
K.Philippidas,PRD48,4255(1993)
17
Vector Anomaly in Fermion Triangle Loop
Sidewise channel
Direct channel
L.DeRaad, K.Milton and W.Tsai, PRD9, 2847(1974)
PRD12, 3972(1975)
18
Vector Anomaly Revisited
Smearing of charge (SMR)
Dimensional Regularization (DR4,DR2)
Pauli-Villars Regulation (PV1, PV2)
B.Bakker and C.Ji, PRD71,053005(2005)
19
Manifestly Covariant Calculation
20
Manifestly Covariant Results
21
LFD Results
22
LFD Results
23
LFD Results
24
LFD Results for Other Regularizations
?

25
Pinning Down Which Form Factors
  • Jauss ?-dependent formulation yields
  • zero-mode contributions both in G00 and G01.
  • W.Jaus, PRD60,054026(1999)PRD67,094010(2003)
  • However, we find only G00 gets zm-contribution.
  • B.Bakker,H.Choi and C.Ji,PRD67,113007(2003)
  • H.Choi and C.Ji,PRD70, 053015(2004)
  • Also,discrepancy exists in weak transition form
    factor A1(q2)f(q2)/(MPMV).
  • Power Counting Method
  • H.Choi and C.Ji, PRD, in press.

26
Electroweak Transition Form Factors
where
27
where
28
Power Counting Method
where
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
Conclusions
  • The common belief of equivalence between
    manifestly covariant and LF Hamiltonian
    formulations is quite treacherous unless the
    amplitude is absolutely convergent.
  • The equivalence can be restored by using
    regularizations with a cutoff parameter L, even
    for the point interactions taking
  • ?????L?? limit.
  • The vector anomaly in the fermion-triangle-loop
    is real and shows non-zero zero-mode contribution
    to helicity zero-to zero amplitude for the good
    current.
  • In LFD, the helicity dependence of vector anomaly
    is also seen as a violation of Lorentz symmetry.
  • For the good phenomenology, it is significant to
    pin down which physical observables receive
    non-zero zero-mode contribution.
  • Power counting method provides a good way to pin
    down this.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com