Title: The Finance Sector Environmental Law and Sustainability Implications
1The Finance Sector Environmental Law and
Sustainability Implications
- Environmental sustainability in a medium and low
impact environment
Justin Smith Nedbank
2Agenda
- Why Sustainability/Environmental issues and the
Finance sector? - Finance sector specific issues
- Management and integration of Sustainability/Envir
onmental issues - Nedbank experience
3Rationale
- Save costs by reducing environmental impacts and
treating employees well. - Increase revenues by improving the environment
and benefiting the local community by creation of
new products and services such as
sustainability/socially responsible funds and
indices. - Reduce risk through engagement with stakeholders.
- Risk Identification and management has become
crucial. Environmental, social and sustainability
concerns are also being recognized as risk areas
with potentially negative financial, legal and
reputational consequences responsible lending - Renewed calls for transparency and governance.
- Regulatory/legal developments internationally and
locally
4Rationale
- Sustainability and CSI issues are now being seen
as corporate reputation/brand issues, not just
social responsibility related. - Build reputation by improving environmental
efficiency and social responsibility. Increase
brand awareness and value. - Setting of high environmental, social and
governance standards by Multilateral Development
Banks such as the World Bank (Equator
Principles). If not have adequate standards in
place may be excluded from tender opportunities. - Reporting to improve transparency and disclosure.
Growth of sustainability reporting worldwide and
in South Africa. - Pressure on Analysts and rating Agencies to
expand social and environmental criteria
5Action Required-SA Driving Forces
- 1. Legislation
- Constitution
- National Environmental Management Act
- National Water Act
- King II
- Banking Charter
- Basle Accord
- 2. Marketing
- 3. Social Responsibility
- 4. Good Business Sense
6Legislative basis
Also Biodiversity legislation, Waste discharge
legislation, Protected areas legislation
7US Lender Liability
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Superfund Legislation (CERCLA)
- Fleet Factors Case-lenders have potential
liability based simply on capacity to control or
influence the actions of borrowers. - Lenders thus need to be aware of their potential
liability during any period hold security
interest in contaminated property, and during any
period in which they hold actual title. - Institutionalised environmental risk spread
worldwide - In Columbia Banco de Columbia held responsible
for cleaning up a site contaminated with
agrochemicals, received from the National
Federation of Cotton Growers in payment of loan.
Thus not just first world phenomenon.
8SA Lender Liability
- SA followed first world liability strict (no
fault), absolute (no differentiation between
intent and negligence), joint and several
liability - Responsible Lending balance risks with not
interfering too much in clients activities - Development of environmental risk management as
department in financial institutions
9National Environmental Management Act
- Various principles endorsed
- Very wide liability
- Who can sue - locus standi
- Who can be sued polluter
- owner or
successor in title - person in control of
- land/right to use
- person who was negligent
- FINANCIER!
-
10Duty of Care/Precautionary Principle
- S28 Every person who causes, has caused or may
cause significant pollution or degradation of the
environment must take responsible measures to
prevent such pollution or degradation from
occurring, continuing or re-occurring or, insofar
as such harm to the environment is authorised by
law or cannot reasonably be avoided or stopped,
to minimise and rectify such pollution or
degradation of the environment
11Clean-up Costs
- Is or was responsible
- directly or indirectly contributed
- owner or successor in title
- in control of or right to use
- negligently failed to prevent
- benefited from clean up
- absolute liability
- directors personal liability
12Liability under the MPRDA
- Notwithstanding the Companies Act or Close
Corporation Act, directors of a company or
members of a CC are jointly and severally liable
for any unacceptable negative impact on the
environment, including damage, degradation or
pollution advertently or inadvertently caused by
the company or CC which they represented - (section 38(2))
13Action required-Potential consequences
- Direct Liability (legal risk)- potential for
lender to become legally responsible to pay for
clean-up of pollution - - value of property
- - reduced investment value
- - personal liability of directors
- - insurance
- Indirect Liability (credit risk) - weakens
borrowing - - customers ability to honour obligations
- - value of assets as security
- - default risk (counterparty exposure)
- Reputational risk- association with negative
environmental/social acts or companies
14Environmental Management Reporting
- Recycling
- responsible energy/water consumption - targets
- supplier/contractor relationships - procurement
- increase awareness
- transport management
- Occupational Health
- Travel Policy
- property design facilities management
- Reporting on water and energy consumption, waste
generated, emissions, recycling, land management
etc.
15Why are Non-financial issues important?
- PWC/Economist Survey August 2004 of Risk
Management in the Financial Services Industry - Reputational Risk now regarded as greatest
threat to organsations market value - Risks, and especially non-financial risks need to
look beyond regulatory requirements to
opportunities for protecting and enhancing value
of the company - Wider choice to consumers, brands crucial
illustrates importance of organisations moral
capital - Can be damaged by wrongful actions of customers,
suppliers and partners!
16Business Review
- Industry sector? - Mining, chemicals, petrol
stations, power, metals, infrastructure - EIA/due diligence done, permits obtained?
- Environmental policy?
- Credit checklists
- Management technical capabilities of customer
- customers ability to meet financial obligations
- previous current environmental performance
- security/collateral/insurance
- land use past present, and location
- Know your customer requirements Money
Laundering
17 The "Equator Principles"
- An industry approach for financial institutions
in determining, assessing and managing
environmental social risk in project
financingIn adopting these principles - seek to
ensure that the projects financed are developed
in a manner that is socially responsible and
reflect sound environmental management practices.
- Undertake to review carefully all proposals for
which customers request project financing. Will
not provide loans directly to projects where the
borrower will not or is unable to comply with
environmental and social policies and processes.
18The Equator Principles
- So far, 28 companies have decided to adopt the
Equator Principles includes 3 Brazilian banks,
no African banks as yet. - Accounting for - 90 of total global project
finance. - These principles apply to projects with a total
capital cost of 50 million or more. - Projects subject to greater scrutiny, ensuring
that they are environmentally and socially sound. - Consistency in approach and terminology among
subscribing banks, thereby reducing project risk
and providing certainty to customers who now has
a prescribed framework. - Competitive pressure on local banks to improve
social and environmental risk practices to be
considered - To partner with subscribing banks or To win
tender proposals from MDB funded projects.
19Example - Citigroup
- Pressure from Rainforest Action Network (RAN)
- Full page ads NY Times, etc, protests
- Financing policies- especially developing
economies - Adopted Equator Principles
- New comprehensive environmental policy in
conjunction RAN deals with endangered
ecosystems, logging, climate change, high caution
zones - Invest in sustainable forestry and renewable
energy - Environmental Affairs Unit
- Environmental and Social Policy Review Committee
- See www.banktrack.org
20Asset Management Developments
- Growth in Socially Responsible Investment and
Sustainability indices - US market till end 2002 13 all funds 2,7
trillion - European market by end 2003 more than 414 billion
pounds - Asia - 2,5 billion
- International benchmark indices Dow Jones
Sustainability World Index, FTSE4Good, JSE SRI
21Asset Management Performance
- Dow Jones SAM index average return on equity of
14.89 versus 8.43 of Dow Jones Industrial
Average to end 2001 - Illustrates companies pursuing corporate
sustainability tend to display superior share
performance, since have long term focus and
consider other drivers of future earnings - Business in the Environment study 2002 found
statistically significant negative correlation
between high environmental standards and stock
price returns volatility shares of
environmentally conscious companies less
volatile, attract risk-averse investors which
have lower return expectations therefore
lowering companies cost of capital - A Morgan Stanley study found that sustainability
leaders in the MSCI World Index financially
outperformed sustainability laggards over the
past 4 years. - JSE SRI index expected to track Top 40 index
closely
22A. M. Legislative Developments
- Pension funds Regulation
- Corporate Governance Standards
- UK- Occupational Pension Schemes Amendment Act
funds must disclose whether policies address
environmental and social issues - Similar legislation Germany, Australia, Europe
- Sweden- Government controlled pension funds must
implement SRI criteria into investment processes
23Asset Management in SA
- Approx 1,6 of total assets are SRI mostly
focused on BEE and infrastructure development. - BEE commission advocating 10 of all assets under
management should be allocated towards areas of
national priority via SRI - Edward Nathan and Friedland (ENF) launched
Sustainability Index in 2002 - JSE SRI index launched May 2004
- Albaraka Equity Fund (negative screening)
21,86 return to June 2004 vs All share return of
6,4 - Nedbank Renaissance Fund 3year return of 10,84
24Insurance - Effects
- Increasingly interlinked global financial market
- Rise of complex and potentially devastating
natural disasters historical statistics and
experience will not provide satisfactory basis
for risk assessment - Responsible for managing long term savings huge
possible impacts of climate change on pension and
life investment portfolios and human health. - Insurers control substantial assets open to
sustainable management, also good experience with
loss prevention precautionary attitude.
Unsustainable development clearly bad investment
as degrades environment. - New societal risks inequality, resource
depletion, pollution, technology developments-
GMO, Biotechnology, Aids.
25Insurance Case Study Swiss Re
- 100 m Sfr eco portfolio to participate in
emissions reductions funds and renewable energy
funds - Provider of emissions reductions credit
guarantees - Lend project risk management, reinsurance and
contingent capital experience to CDM projects - Insurance solutions GHG professional liability
insurance - Internal facilities management
26UNEP FIUnited Nations Environment Programme
Finance Initiative is a unique global partnership
between UNEP, and 227 banks, insurers and asset
managers in 45 countries.MissionTo realise
best environmental and sustainability practice
across all levels of financial institution
operations. OriginUNEP Statement by Banks on
the Environment Sustainable Development
presented at Earth Summit Rio de Janeiro 1992.
27 UNEP FI Activities
Regional Task Forces
Special Projects
Working Groups
Africa
Water
Asset Management
Asia
FinanceConflict
Climate Change
Sustainable Management, Reporting and Indicators
Oceania
Latin America
North America
28Hot Topics
- Internationally the Extractive Industries
Review - Environment Agency Operating and Financial
Review regulations - recommendations UK
environmental reporting - UNEP/GRI project environmental reporting
indicators for the finance sector - Locally new EIA regulations
- Golf Courses press attention on Water issues
29King Report
- Board is ultimately accountable and responsible
for the performance and affairs of the company
(2.1.1) - Board must ensure the company complies with all
relevant laws, regulations and codes of practice
(2.1.5) - Board must identify and monitor non-financial
aspects relevant to the companys business
(2.1.12) - Directors have individual and collective
responsibility for the companys environmental
performance and compliance - Directors should be aware of the standards
applicable to their industry regarding
environmental management - Directors should ensure they are aware of and
understand the principles in Chapter 1 of NEMA.
30How do you manage all these issues in Practice????
31Integrated Sustainability Reporting
- King II Section 4 Integrated Sustainability
Reporting - Dedicated positions established
- Linkages with Corporate Governance
- Software system for information in place
- Key Performance Indicators defined
- Internal Awareness Workshops for buy-in
training - Policies and procedures to support
32Sustainability Report
- Needs to be useful tool for business units,
as well as building banks profile and
communicating progress to stakeholders - Corporate Governance
- Employees and Unions
- HIV/Aids
- Corporate Social Responsibility Foundation
- Affinities - Trusts
- Financial Sector Charter and Black Economic
Empowerment - Clients
- Government and external relations
- Environment
33Sustainability Report
- Aims for the next report
- Reporting against targets wherever possible
- More data on environmental performance
- More information on HIV/Aids
- More structured information on stakeholders
- Revision of key performance indicators with
business units - Information from foreign operations
- More input from staff in process
34Management Structure
TRANSFORMATION AND SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE
DIRECTORS AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
ARC COMMITTEE
EXCO
CEO
BOARD
CHAIRMAN
Group Transformation Committee
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DIVISION
NEDBANK FOUNDATION
RECOVERY PROGRAMME
CORPORATE CITIZENSHIP COMMITTEE
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MANCO
35Sustainability alignment
- Nedcor Foundation contributed over R130m to 350
projects over last 4 years in education,
leadership development, job creation and welfare - Green, Sports and Arts Culture Trusts unique
Affinity products and marketing relationships
Green Trust for example over R60 m to
conservation projects in conjunction with WWF.
(Sports Trust R18m, Arts Culture Trust R9m) - Staff participation culture
- Team Challenge programme
- Local Heros programme
36Stakeholder Communication/Engagement
- Done in ad hoc fashion by various divisions
- Need for integrated approach and policy ito King
II - Identify list of stakeholders
- Stakeholder dialogue methods
- Information generated
- How information used
- Lack of structure, not ongoing, feedback to
stakeholders - Need for ongoing communication loop
- First stakeholder sessions held in JHB, CT,
Durban - Draft Stakeholder guidelines completed
37Social Responsibility and Foundation
- Foundation key part of Corporate Governance
division - Work together closely on CSI and sustainability
management - Ensure consistency in approach, appropriate
support and assistance - Staff participation
- Financial Sector Charter
- Foundation often isolated from line management-
strategically link CSI to core competencies
alignment with business crucial
38Environmental Policy
- The development of an Environmental Policy
confirms Nedbanks commitment to develop an
environmental protection and preservation culture
in both its own operating environment and all the
parties with which it has a business association.
- Managed as part of Occupational Health and
Environmental Management Programme - Currently being revised regarding
lending/financing activities
39Project Structured Finance
- World Bank/IFC/other MDBs
- Equator Principles Criticism?
- Competition from Western banks in Africa/SA
- Environmental Impact Assessments/ Programmes
- Nedcor ensures legislation and requirements of
World Bank etc. are complied with
40Strategic Approach
- Leadership role existing green bank image
broaden to sustainability and good governance.
Selectively build reputation and profile - Integration into business in order to identify
opportunities and risks - Competitive Sustainability Advantage
- Strategic partnerships WWF-SA, United Nations
Environment Programme, UNISA, NBI participate
in sectoral and cross-sectoral initiatives
41United Nations Environment Programme Finance
Initiatives
- Nedbank first SA commercial bank to become UNEP
FI signatory - Involvement on UNEP FI African Task Force
promoting sustainability considerations in Africa - African representative on joint UNEP FI/GRI
project developing environmental reporting
indicators for the finance sector - Nedbank leading project under UNEP FI banner to
develop common approach to environmental/social
risk issues in SA finance sector - Aim to interact with local and international
banks, and learn from experiences
42Partnership with WWF-SA
- Green Trust partnership in place since 1990
- Nedbank and its clients have contributed over
R60m to conservation projects in Southern Africa - Broaden and strengthen partnership
- WWF input into policies, strategy and reporting
- Nedbank ensure responsible internal environmental
management, approach to financing, staff
involvement - Novel partnership in SA context
43What are some of our achievements?
- Trialogue rates Nedcor as top in financial
services sector for both corporate citizenship
and corporate social investment - Sustainability Report ito Global Reporting
Inititative Guidelines - First SA commercial bank to commit to the United
Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiatives - Environmental Policy
- Finalist in Mail and Guardian Greening the
Future Awards and Investing in the Future
Awards best corporate report - JSE SRI Index inclusion
- Dow Jones World Sustainability Index (1 of 28
banks worldwide) - NBI Sustainable Futures Advisory Committee
44Steps to Sustainability
- What are some of our key steps?
- Structure corporate citizenship committee at
management level, Board Committee focusing on
Transformation and Sustainability being
re-constituted - Bi-Annual Board presentation done in Feb/August
on non-financial issues - Approved Group Corporate Social Responsibility
principles - Internal roadshow throughout Southern Africa
July to October and participation in CEOs
roadshow awareness building - Internal corporate governance and sustainability
conference held in September - Focused training sessions run concurrently
45Steps Going Forward
- Manage reputation carefully
- Lending practices refine environmental policy
- Improve internal environmental performance
- Project Finance Equator Principles
- Training Awareness throughout organisational
network - View on Socially Responsible Investment
products? - Finance sector developments Finance Sector
Charter - Integration of non-financial/sustainability
issues into business operations strategy
guidance from top