Social Cognition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Social Cognition

Description:

Numerous ways to define the term. How do we think about ... Mental shortcuts/Rules of thumb. When do we use these shortcuts. Lack of time for full processing ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:101
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: raymond1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Social Cognition


1
Social Cognition
  • Thinking About our Self and Others
  • How Accurate are We?

2
Social Cognition - Definitions
  • Numerous ways to define the term
  • How do we think about the world
  • How do we process social information
  • How do we organize the social targets in our
    lives
  • Social judgment
  • The intersection of cognitive and social
    psychology

3
Are We Rational Thinkers?
  • Harold Kelley said yes. We attempt to act like
    naïve scientists.
  • Argued that we use three pieces of information to
    make behavioral attributions
  • Consensus Do others behave the same way in the
    same situation?
  • Consistency Does the person always behave in the
    same way to the stimulus?
  • Distinctiveness Does (s)he behave in this manner
    in all situations?
  • What kind of awareness does it take to process
    information in this way?

4
Do We Take Shortcuts?
  • The current direction of social cognition leads
    us to believe that people usually take (out of
    necessity) shortcuts when understanding the world
  • Fiske and Taylor call us cognitive misers

5
Context and Social Judgment
  • Much of our judgment is relative influenced by
    the context of the situation
  • Reference points and contrast effects (Short
    basketball players are often over 6 ft. tall)
  • Priming recently encountered thoughts used to
    interpret social events. Text offers quote
    Media may not tell us what to think, but
    certainly tells us what to think about

6
Context, Continued
  • Framing the Decision How a question is asked
    influences our answer. We humans tend to avoid
    loss.
  • 1/3 die or 2/3 saved Can influence decision
  • Primacy effect and impression formation
  • Emphasizes importance of making a good first
    impression
  • Asch study Edward Jones (answering first
    questions leads to high ability ratings)
  • Explanations attention decrement, interpretive
    set

7
Heuristics
  • Mental shortcuts/Rules of thumb
  • When do we use these shortcuts
  • Lack of time for full processing
  • Information overload
  • When issues are not important
  • When we have little solid information to use in
    decision making

8
Heuristics
  • Representative Heuristic (Kahneman and Tversky)
    focus on the similarity of one object to another
    to infer that the first object acts like the
    second.
  • All expensive wines must be good
  • Foods with goofy, childish labels cant be
    nutritious (Consumer Reports research)
  • This heuristic is the basis of stereotyping

9
Heuristics
  • Availability Heuristic
  • Judgments are based upon how easy it is for us to
    bring specific examples to mind (e.g., death by
    shark attack vs. falling airplane parts)
  • Attitude Heuristic
  • Determine what is true based upon your feelings
    for things (e.g., assuming that Presidents plan
    is bad because you dont like him
  • Halo Effect general impression influences all of
    our ratings
  • False Consensus Effect Assumption that others
    like what we like (we overestimate reality)

10
Categorization and Stereotypes
  • Stereotypes are generalizations that often have a
    related set of expectations associated with them
  • Not inherently bad we can control impact of
    stereotypic effects. But
  • Darley and Gross judge girl as having less
    ability when she comes from low vs. high SES
    (even though performance is the same)

11
Illusory Correlation
  • The (inaccurate) perception of a relationship
    between two entities that we think should be
    related
  • Always rains after I wash car
  • PMS?
  • What causes this effect?
  • Memory for vivid events

12
In-group/Out-group Effects
  • Us versus them
  • In-group favoritism tendency to see ones own
    group as better
  • Out-group homogeneity we view people in other
    groups as more similar to each other than people
    of our own group
  • Park and Rothbart sorority study (and a million
    others)
  • Minimum Group Paradigm (Tajfel) Create
    meaningless groups and still get these effects

13
Reconstructive Memory
  • Memory is not veridical. It is pieced together
    based upon knowledge and expectations
  • Elizabeth Loftus Research on eyewitness
    testimony and leading questions
  • Hit versus smashed

14
Autobiographical Memory
  • Hazel Markus argued that we organize our personal
    history in terms of self-schemas
  • Coherent set of expectations and beliefs about
    self
  • We filter memories through this schema
  • Over time our memories become increasingly
    coherent (shift stuff that doesnt fit schema)
    and thus, less accurate

15
Recovered Memory Phenomenon
  • Loftus research on reconstructive memory has
    revealed how easily false memories can be planted
    in our minds
  • Leads to skepticism concerning the deluge of
    tales involving recovered memories of abuse (both
    sexual and satanic)
  • Difficult dont want to discredit valid cases
  • However, consider self-fulfilling prophecies and
    desire to find external explanations for our
    shortcomings

16
Dissociative Identity Disorder
  • Up until 1944 only 76 reported cases
  • In 1973 Sybil was published
  • Up until 1980 no separate listing in the DSM
  • Between 1985 and 1995 almost 40,000 cases
    reported
  • Uneasy link between D.I.D, recovered memories,
    and hypnosis
  • People diagnosed with D.I.D. tend to be very easy
    to hypnotize, suggests that they are susceptible
    to suggestion

17
How Conservative Are We?
  • The answer is very
  • We aim to make life predictable. Thus, we insist
    on a lot of information before we change our
    opinion
  • Stereotypes and subtyping
  • Problem often leads to inaccuracy
  • Confirmation Bias
  • Tendency to seek information that confirms our
    original hypotheses and beliefs
  • Can we ever prove something through this
    approach?

18
Attitude-Behavior Consistency
  • We have already discussed the LaPiere study
  • Wickers (1969) exhaustive review underscores the
    lack of agreement of attitude and behavior in the
    scientific literature
  • Jones and Davis (1965) despite this evidence
    people tend to look to attitudes
  • Label this Correspondent Inference (we look for
    attitudes that correspond to their behaviors)
  • Especially when the behaviors are socially
    undesirable
  • Fazio points out, attitudes are good predictors
    when they are highly accessible

19
Biases in Social Explanation
  • Fundamental Attribution Error
  • Egocentric Thought we perceive our selves as
    more central to events than we are
  • Illusion of control (Langer and choice of lottery
    ticket)
  • Astrology and Barnum Statements
  • Memory is better for events tied to us

20
Self Serving Biases
  • Tend to make dispositional attributions for our
    success and situational for our failures
  • Can help us to protect our self concepts and
    self-esteem. In essence, ego defensive behavior
  • Seligman has found a link between optimism and
    better physical health
  • Depressive realism and depression
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com