PERIOTEST

1
2982 Comparisons of Periodontal Conditions
Between the Habitually Chewing Side and the
Non-habitually Chewing Side J. SUZUKI, M.
KANAZASHI, K. GOMI and T. ARAI Tsurumi
University,Dept. of Periodontics, JAPAN
Abstracts Objective In this study, we
investigated the differences of periodontal
conditions, which were tooth mobility and probing
depth, between the habitually chewing side and
the non-habitually chewing side. Materials and
Methods We examined 10 slight periodontal
patients were employed as subjects (2 males and 8
females, aged 27-63 years) who had normal
dentitions and 28 teeth except third molar, and
they were finished initial preparation. The
habitually chewing side was decided as follows.
On the panoramic radiography, the fat and short
type condyle side compared the other was decided
the non-habitually chewing side. Furthermore, on
the study models, higher curved of Spee was
decided the non-habitually chewing side. All
subjects were satisfied these two parameters in a
same side. Measurements of tooth mobility and
probing depth were examined by PERIOTEST?(SIEMENS
Co., Germany.) and William's probe? (Hu-Friedy
Co., U.S.A.) respectively. Statistical analyses
were performed one -factor ANOVA. Results Mean
tooth mobility and probing depth in the
habitually chewing side were 5.94.8(Total),
5.14.9(anterior teeth), 5.34.0(premolars),
7.74.9(molars) and 2.11.2mm(Total), 1.81.0 mm
(anterior teeth), 2.00.9 mm (premolars), 2.61.4
mm (molars). In the non-habitually chewing side
those were 6.35.8(Total), 4.63.7(anterior
teeth), 6.54.3(premolars), 8.88.3(molars) and
2.11.2 mm (Total), 1.81.0 mm (anterior teeth),
2.21.2 mm (premolars), 2.51.3 mm (molars).
There were no significant differences between the
habitually chewing side and the non-habitually
chewing side on tooth mobility and probing depth.
Conclusion There were no differences of
mobility and probing depth between the habitually
chewing side and the non-habitually chewing
side. Objective In this study, we investigated
the differences of periodontal conditions, which
were tooth mobility and probing depth, between
the habitually chewing side and the
non-habitually chewing side. Materials and
Methods We examined 10 slight periodontal
patients were employed as subjects (2 males and 8
females, aged 27-63 years) who had normal
dentitions and 28 teeth except third molar, and
they were finished initial preparation. The
habitually chewing side was decided as follows.
On the panoramic radiography, the fat and short
type condyle side compared the other was decided
the non-habitually chewing side. Furthermore, on
the study models, higher curved of Spee was
decided the non-habitually chewing side. All
subjects were satisfied these two parameters in a
same side. Measurements of tooth mobility and
probing depth were examined by PERIOTEST?
(SIEMENS Co., Germany.) and William's probe?
(Hu-Friedy Co., U.S.A.) respectively.
Statistical analyses were performed one -factor
ANOVA.
ExampleThe habitually chewing side is right side
Discussion Probing depth There was a tendency
that premolars on the non-habitually chewing
side and molars on the habitually chewing side
were deeper. Tooth Mobility There was a tendency
that anterior teeth on the habitually chewing
side, premolars and molars on the non-habitually
chewing side were larger. There was a tendency
that tooth mobility and probing depth more
increased to molars from anterior teeth on both
chewing sides. We consider this reason is the
chewing cycle that at first anterior teeth on
both chewing side cut food rough, next premolars
on the non-habitually chewing side crush these
more small and at last molar on the habitually
chewing side grind down these and swallow these
ExampleThe habitually chewing side is right side
Results Mean tooth mobility and probing depth in
the habitually chewing side were 5.94.8(Total),
5.14.9(anterior teeth), 5.34.0(premolars),
7.74.9(molars) and 2.11.2mm(Total), 1.81.0 mm
(anterior teeth), 2.00.9 mm (premolars), 2.61.4
mm (molars). In the non-habitually chewing side
those were 6.35.8(Total), 4.63.7(anterior
teeth), 6.54.3(premolars), 8.88.3(molars) and
2.11.2 mm (Total), 1.81.0 mm (anterior teeth),
2.21.2 mm (premolars), 2.51.3 mm (molars).
There were no significant differences between the
habitually chewing side and the non-habitually
chewing side on tooth mobility and probing depth.
Conclusion There were no differences of tooth
mobility and probing depth between the habitually
chewing side and the non-habitually chewing side.
PERIOTEST