Title: What is an experimental trial
1What is an experimental trial?
- A planned experiment in humans
- Designed to test the efficacy of a treatment or
intervention - Comparison of outcomes in a group of participants
receiving the intervention and those in a
comparable group of patients with a control
therapy - Participants in both groups are enrolled, receive
intervention, and followed over same time period
2Gold standard study design
- Purposes include
- To test hypotheses
- to test effectiveness of interventions
- to suggest public health policies and programs
- to assess costs and benefits of programs
- to evaluate efficacy of health services
3What is the question?
- Primary question
- Stated in advance
- Clearly defined
- Have adequate power to detect differences
- Usually stated as a hypothesis
- The outcome may be a beneficial action such as
saving life, ameliorating illness, reducing
symptoms, improving quality of life, or
modification of an intermediate characteristic - May be stated as testing no difference between
groups
4What is the question?
- Secondary question
- May examine a different response/outcome
variables - May examine subgroups of the population
- Adverse effects
- Natural history
5Intervention
- Drugs, procedures, lifestyle modification, etc
- Must be standardized across treatment groups
- Potential intervention must be maximized
- Must take into account dose, time of initiation,
duration, logistics, etc..
6Basic Trial Design
7Study Design
- Use of a control/comparison group
- Randomization
- removes potential selection bias
- produces comparable groups
- validity of statistical test guaranteed
- although groups compared are never perfectly
balanced for important covariates in any single
experiment, the process of randomization makes it
possible to ascribe a probability distribution
to the difference in outcomes between the two
groups receiving equally effective treatments and
thus assign significance levels to observed
differences
8Randomization
- Simple
- Blocked
- Stratified
- Multi-utility attribute
9Other Designs
- Non-random concurrent controls
- Crossover
- Historical controls/databases
- Factorial design
- Controlled clinical trial vs community or
group-randomized trials
10Cancer Trials
- Prophylactic trial
- Designed to test the effectiveness of a substance
to prevent a disease (chemoprevention trials) - Phases of clinical trials
- Phase I -
- Initial testing new vaccine or drug, small
sample, identify dose-limiting toxicities,
optimal dose range, pharmacology of substance - Phase II
- Testing on specific tumors, slightly larger
sample, determine efficacy on tumor size,
validate toxicity , dose, may be randomized - Phase III
- Randomized, testing efficacy, outcomes are
survival, QOL, etc..
11Outcome/Response variable
- Total mortality, death from a specific cause,
incidence of disease complication or specific
adverse effect, symptomatic relief, clinical
finding, laboratory measure, cost - May be stated as a change from one state to
another (alive to dead) or from a level of a
continuous variable to another - Defined in advance with operational definitions
- Capable of being assessed in all participants
- Sometimes participation ends in the study when
response variable occurs while other times there
is a fixed endpoint - Capable of unbiased assessment
- Response variable should be capable of being
ascertained as completely as possible - Measured independently of treatment and control
12Masking or Blinding
- Concealing knowledge of treatment assignment to
reduce bias - Patients/participants
- Observers (investigators)
- Data monitors/ collectors/ analyst
- Primary purpose is objectivity
- Single masked- participant is masked regarding
intervention - Double masked- participant and investigator masked
13Study Population
Population w/o condition
Definition of condition
Ineligible
Entry Criteria
Enrollment
Not enrolled
14Study Population- Inclusion criteria
- Participants who have potential to benefit from
the intervention - High likelihood you can detect the hypothesized
effect - Weigh adverse effects against possible benefits
- Competing risk
- Likely to adhere to study protocol
15Generalization
- Participants are usually nonrandomly chosen from
the population - Participants in trials are considered special
- Volunteer population may have certain
characteristics - Always attempt to characterize the population
and how different from the target population - Generalization appropriate in some cases but not
in others
16"Final Report" On The Aspirin Component Of The
Physician's Health Study by Harris Gelberg, M.D.
Department of Cardiology In the Spring 1988
issue of the Highlights (Volume 11, Number 2) the
preliminary report on the effects of aspirin in
the prevention of heart attacks was reviewed. In
the July 20, 1989 issue of the New England
Journal of Medicine, the final report was
submitted. The information gleaned from this
study that involved 22,071 participants over 60.2
months revealed a significant reduction in heart
attack risk in those participants taking one
adult aspirin every other day. This group
demonstrated a 44 reduction in heart attack risk
when compared to the group taking a placebo.
Although there was no overall reduction in
cardiovascular mortality, the author concluded
this was due to the very low incidence of heart
attacks among physicians in this study This
reduced risk was seen only in participants over
50 years of age. Furthermore, aspirin had the
greatest protective effect in those with the
lowest cholesterol levels.
17(No Transcript)
18Other issues
- Intention to treat principle
- Effectiveness vs. efficacy
- Effectiveness refers to extent to which specific
treatment produces intended results (also
intention to treat analysis) - Efficacy refers to potential effect of treatment
under optimal conditions
19Websites
- Society for Clinical Trialshttp//www.sctweb.org/
- Controlled Clinical Trials Journalhttp//www.el
sevier.nl/inca/publications/store/5/0/5/7/5/8/ - Clinical Trials Discussion Threads and FAQs
http//pharminfo.com/conference/clintrial/clnarc.h
tml