Maintenance optimisation: 50 years of models and applications - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 46
About This Presentation
Title:

Maintenance optimisation: 50 years of models and applications

Description:

Professor of Operations Research, Quantitative Logistics and ... Stork PMT B.V. Thales Nederland BV. voestalpine Railpro BV. NedTrain B.V. DAF Trucks B.V. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:123
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: rommert
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Maintenance optimisation: 50 years of models and applications


1
Maintenance optimisation 50 years of models
and applications
Rommert Dekker Professor of Operations Research,
Quantitative Logistics and Information Technology
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
2
Maintenance optimization
  • An overview of history
  • Maintenance Optimization
  • The delay time model
  • Other application areas - conflicts between
    organisations- road maintenance - service
    logistics

3
Change in maintenance techniques
  • Third Generation
  • Condition monitoring
  • Design for reliability and maintainability
  • Expert systems
  • Failure mode and effect analyses
  • Maint. Mgmt Info Syst.
  • RCM
  • Multi-skilling and team work (TPM)
  • Second Generation
  • Scheduled Overhauls
  • Systems for planning and controlling work
  • Big, slow computers
  • Life-cyle costing
  • Hazard studies
  • First Generation
  • Fix it when broke

1940 1950 1960 1970
1980 1990 2000
Source naar Moubray (1991)
4
Today (2006)
  • Extensive use of Condition monitoring and it much
    better insight into failure mechanisms
  • Most systems are pretty reliable, but can be
    better
  • Computerised Maintenance Management Information
    Systems are widely used
  • There can be extensive IT support for the
    maintenance technician
  • Decision support systems are used at many places
  • Maintenance knowledge can be shared through the
    WWW
  • Asset management has come up as wider principle
    than MM.

5
Today maintenance problems
  • Rated secondly compared to new construction, also
    at universities
  • Relation budget-maintenance output is not clear
    at a high level, with the following results -
    constant pressure on budgets- effect of budget
    cuts is visible only after some years
  • Government policies change rapidly and are less
    predictable, due to societal pressures
    (accidents) (e.g. railway privatisation)
  • Privatisation government services creates much
    uncertainty
  • Much has to be learned on effects of outsourcing
    maintenance

6
Example
  • Split up of Dutch Railways (NS) into a passenger,
    a cargo operator, a Rail Infra Manager, Rail
    Traffic Control and a Rail Capacity Allocator.
    Maintenance has been outsourced to 3 process
    operators.
  • At the same time, there have been large
    maintenance budget cuts in anticipation of an
    increased efficiency, although the need for
    maintenance increased because of an increase in
    traffic.
  • Similar developments in the UK. First
    privitisation of rail infra management and later
    nationalisation (Railtrack - NetworkRail)
  • At the moment hundreds of million euros needed to
    catch up backlog. At the same time large
    disruptions because of computer failures!

7
Maintenance Optimisation what is it?
  • Model deterioration, determine risks and costs of
    failure and its consequences as well as costs of
    maintenance
  • Determine best maintenance concept (which type
    of maintenance )
  • Optimise within the type of maintenance (best
    frequency, inspection policy, replacement limits,
    etc).
  • Coordinate maintenance execution with production
    and other maintenance (sometimes separate of 3)
  • Determine priorities in execution of preventive
    maintenance and deferrable corrective, determine
    necessary work capacity

8
NB 40 million hits in Google
9
First models date from end 50s / 60s Barlow
Proschan, Jorgenson and McCall
10
Maintenance optimization
  • An overview of history
  • Maintenance Optimization
  • The delay time model
  • Other application areas - conflicts between
    organisations- road maintenance- service
    logistics

11
Delay time model (Christer)
  • Objective to reduce the number of failures by
    removing faults (incipient failures) if
    discovered at inspections, which are carried out
    at regular intervals of fixed length T
    (regardless of failures)
  • Model
  • two stages as good as new ? fault ? failure
  • faults occur with (Poisson) rate ?
  • random (delay) time between fault and failure has
    Cdf F(.)
  • Advanced statistical techniques are needed to
    estimate delay time distribution
  • inspection costs ci, failure replacement costs cf
  • Number of failures in cycle
  • Average costs Optimise by applying grid
    search

12
Example delay time model application to
ventilators in the operating department
13
Delay time model
  • More than 10 applications, but mainly by
    academics
  • Many papers studied the estimation of the
    delay-time (as its start is unobservable). Good
    techniques are available today.
  • Yet connection with RCM delay time P-F
    interval has hardly been made
  • Communities do not talk with each other

14
What is needed for optimisation?
  • Data - sourceshistoric dataexpert
    judgementcondition measurements and physical
    models
  • Modelsgeared to the decisions to be taken and
    indicating what kind of data is needed
  • Inference engines and toolsyardsticks, graphical
    aids, computers
  • Much data is recorded for maintaining status quo
    rather than for finding optimum way of
    operations!

15
Issues Maintenance Optimisation in Practice
  • Determination of (indirect) costs of failure is
    difficult, as many interventions may happen
  • Statistical lifetimes are difficult to get and
    uninformative, because of a- lousy
    registration- modification of equipment in case
    of many failures
  • Time-based preventive maintenance has been
    replaced by condition-based
  • Execution of optimisation is complex and requires
    special software and expertise

16
According to Moubray (1991)
  • Optimisation is like shooting with a canon on a
    fly and almost always not necessary
  • Only in 5 of the parts /systems there is ageing
    and planned PM is necessary in other cases it is
    questionnable.
  • Question always the same study is referred to
    (airline parts) so is the 5 true?

17
Economic optimisation vs RCM
  • RCM
  • general, simple approach
  • moderate data requirements
  • can be done on paper, or by computer
  • focusses on critical components
  • suitable for complex systems
  • decisions are structured, but not fully supported
  • no quantitative support of choices to be made
    (eg. Intervals)
  • suitable at component level
  • Economic optimisation
  • specific, complex approach
  • heavy data requirements
  • needs computer
  • available models for simple systems, new
    approaches needed for complex systems
  • decisions are quantitatively supported, allowing
    what if questions
  • economic quantification often gives more insight
  • suitable for important decisions on system level

A new methodology is needed which combines the
simpleness and generality of RCM with some
economic quantification and optimisation
(Rausand Vatn 96, Horton, 92, Dekker and
Scarf 98)
18
Maintenance optimisation in DSS
  • However use of the DSS MAINOPT at Shell PERNIS
    refinery saved more than 2 mln in 2 years time.
  • Crucial elements combination between reliability
    and costs. Allows what-if evaluations.
    Furthermore, ensures that problems are solved in
    cooperation between maintenance and production,
    rather than in a fighting mode. This can not be
    provided by RCM.

19
Examples of decision support systems
  • Design reliability selection of units,
    redundancy SPARC, RAMA, Miriam, Maros
  • Strategic maintenance concepts and intervals
    for a single unitMainopt, Manco, KMOSS, MACRO
    budgets and life cycle costing
    LCC-Optcondition maintenance Jardine Makis
    97
  • Tactical, operational best execution of
    maintenance -PROMPT (turbines), IVON (roads),
    PONTIS (bridges)ECOTRACK (railtrack)
  • Several more are on the market

20
A comparison of application areas
  • Equipment maintenancelarge diversity, complex
    hierarchy, deterioration location dependent, poor
    data collection
  • Civil structure maintenance (roads,
    bridges)complex but well studied and slow
    deterioration, often much repetition, maintenance
    driven by norms
  • Airplane maintenanceformalised environments,
    good data collection, little opportunity to
    change concepts, optimisation mainly in
    logistics
  • Note methodological people lack domain
    knowledge, however different types of engineers
    do not talk with each other, so techniques are
    not easily spread out

21
Maintenance optimization
  • An overview of history
  • Maintenance Optimization
  • The delay time model
  • Other application areas - conflicts between
    organisations- road maintenance- service
    logistics

22
Important relations between stakeholdersneed to
be well-defined and organised to ensure overall
optimisation
Manufacturer
design
Indicates information,money,power
Owner
Maintainer
User
operations
23
Conflicts between organisations
  • In design phase advanced reliability studies have
    been carried out, taking failure consequences and
    costs into account as well as lifetime
    distributions
  • As a result redundancy decisions are made
  • However, once system is transferred to user, he
    has to learn from scratch again. He also does not
    have the scale the OEM has, so learning goes
    slow.
  • The OEM however is often not involved in the
    operations, creates uncertainty to make more
    money.

24
Questions
  • Why does the OEM not only sell equipment, but
    provide also all data around it, including system
    structuring in SAP format?
  • Observation
  • IHC Holland fabricates dredging ships and left
    maintenance traditionally to user. Now it is
    interested in providing service, helping to
    execute maintenance and provide right spare parts
    in time. She is not the only one!
  • Philips is turning to Medical systems, which are
    much more service intensive with much higher
    profit margins!

25
Whats an E-SPIR 2000 ? (Electronic - Spare Parts
Interchangeability Record)
A software program to obtain spare parts
information in projects from the equipment
suppliers in a standard format.
The tool supports the review, selection and
purchase of spare parts and provides progress and
budget control for project management.
The program consists of two parts
Suppliers program, in which the Suppliers prepare
the spare parts quotation in a SPIR format.
The program is available free of charge via
Internet.
Advisors program available against a Licence
FeeIn the advisor program all Supplier SPIRs are
collected in one file.
Look at the Website HTTP//www.e-spir.comMore
than 2100 suppliers listed and a DEMO version
available
26

A SPIR sheet as it used to be
  • Complaints
  • Unreadable
  • Many errors
  • Suppliers often do not fill in all data required

27
Maintenance optimization
  • An overview of history
  • Maintenance Optimization
  • The delay time model
  • Other application areas - conflicts between
    organisations- road maintenance- service
    logistics

28
Road Maintenance when to do it?
  • Much highway road maintenance is done at night,
    while one or two lanes are closed for traffic.
    Time for maintenance is short (? inefficiency)
    and safety of road workers is not guaranteed.
  • Question would it be advisable to cluster all
    maintenance and maintain large road stretches
    (about 4 km) in one go and redirect traffic to
    the other road side (in a 3-1 or 4-0 system)?
  • Supposed Advantages safer, all maintenance can
    be done for 10 years, fewer traffic
    jamsDisadvantage is clustering a good idea
    (not condition-based!)

29
The three systems from top-bottom- traditional
(2-1)- 3-1 system- 4-0 system
30
(No Transcript)
31
Figure 7.2 implementation of the
sector-integration approach
32
Figure 7.3 implementation of the
junction-to-junction maintenance approach
Application of junction-to-junction Grouping of
maintenance

33
Long-run average preservation- and queuing-cost
per year, for porous asphalt roads
v/w vehicles per carriageway both carriage
ways are 12.5 meters broad.
34
Empirical distribution function of the yearly
preservation costs for dense asphalt roads and
Traditional (sector-integration) approach
35
Empirical distribution function of yearly
preservation costs for dense asphalt roads for
junction-to-junction regeneration (within a 3-1
system)
36
Maintenance optimization
  • An overview of history
  • Maintenance Optimization
  • The delay time model
  • Other application areas - service logistics

37
THE MAIN GOAL

RESEARCH
RESEARCH
To deliver innovative products that can in
principle be implemented in practise with the
purpose to improve the quality and to reduce the
costs of service logistics operations.
Examples new service logistics concepts
planning and control mechanisms The
innovative character will be demonstrated by
pilot studies and publication of the main ideas
in scientific journals.
38
RESEARCH TOPICS

RESEARCH
RESEARCH
  • Design for service logistics
  • Coordination of spare part inventory and
    transportation management
  • Integrated Control of Service Parts Inventories
    and Repair Shops
  • Demand Criticality
  • Preventive maintenance and service parts
    inventory control
  • Demand Forecasting and Asset management
  • Design of service contracts
  • Networks with lateral and emergency shipments
  • Integrated control of service parts, service
    tools, and service engineers

39
Companies Involved

RESEARCH
RESEARCH
  • Fokker Services B.V.
  • Philips Medical Systems BV
  • Stork PMT B.V.
  • Thales Nederland BV
  • voestalpine Railpro BV
  • NedTrain B.V.
  • DAF Trucks B.V.
  • Ortec Consultants
  • Who more?

40
Present Service Issues (1)
  • Parts assortment- has expanded over the years
    (10.000 to 200.000 items)- many non-movers-
    limited standardisation
  • Stocks- too many (guess 20 too much)-
    unbalanced- reflect uncertainty in the supply
    chain
  • Parts get obsolete

41
Present Service Issues (2)
  • Forecasting- difficult for slow movers-
    information on installed based and reliability
    lacks
  • Obsolescence- suppliers suddenly stop delivering
    - final buys are difficult
  • ICT- migrations to ERP are complex and take much
    capacity- use of ERP is complex, not all
    features understood- limitations of ERP are
    difficult to quantify in the boardroom

42
Present Service Issues (3)
  • Cooperation in the supply chain
  • Limited or not
  • Historically created powerpositions
  • Suppliers do not cooperate
  • Installed-base information
  • Often not available
  • Search for right info is difficult
  • A pro-active role is difficult to achieve

43
Trends and ambitions companies
  • After sales supply chain management
  • Centralised control
  • Being the supply chain coordinator
  • Control on (customer differentiated) uptime
  • Outsourcing
  • Not only warehousing and distribution
  • Maintenance management and spare parts management
  • ICT
  • Whole supply chain structure and processes in one
    system
  • Leave possibility open for (ERP certified) add-ons

44
Preventive Maintenance and spare parts
  • Demand for spares is difficult to predict, low
    and highly erratic monthly demand 0, 0, 7, 0,
    1, 0, 0, 0, 31, 0, 0, 0, 0,
  • As a result high inventories are maintained, but
    can they be lowered?
  • Inventory deployment can be improved if- we do
    better forecasting by using all kind of
    information- have more insight into the demand
    process, e.g. by considering the maintenance
    planning process

45
Maintenance and Spares
46
Asset Management - questions
  • Many companies / organisations struggle with
    asset management. What economic benefits are IT
    systems able to provide? In which cases is a
    detailed asset management attractive?
  • Setting up an asset management is not the main
    work it is the maintenance.
  • Asset management information should be provided
    from the start by the builders / manufacturers
  • Asset Management is useful for maintenance, but
    also for service logistics and for recovery of
    end-of-use / life value!

47
Maintenance optimization - conclusions
  • We started 50 years ago with mathematical models,
    but it is not the models, but the domain
    knowledge and IT which makes it worth
  • It is certainly worthwhile, but we do not to
    fight for more applications
  • Still economics pressure drive for more
  • Automatic registration and cheaper IT will be big
    drivers for more application, but the main
    question is how and where

48
Maintenance optimization - Questions
  • Technical systems are quite diverse civil,
    mechanic, planes, roads how can we learn from
    them
  • How can we learn from different areas
  • What do the users see as main issues?
  • Service logistics now sees many applications
    will this also be the case for maintenance
    optimization?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com